Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:08:38.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questionnaire identifying management practices surrounding calving on spring-calving dairy farms and their associations with herd size and herd expansion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

C. Cummins ,
D. P. Berry ,
R. Sayers ,
I. Lorenz  and
E. Kennedy
C. Cummins
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
D. P. Berry
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
R. Sayers
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
I. Lorenz
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
E. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Healthy calves are fundamental to any profitable dairy enterprise. Research to-date, has focused on year-round calving systems which experience many different challenges compared to spring-calving systems. The objective of the present study was to determine the on-farm dry cow, calving, and colostrum management practices of spring-calving dairy production systems, and quantify their associations with herd size and herd expansion status (i.e. expanding or not expanding). Information on these management practices was available from a survey of 262 Irish spring-calving dairy farmers, representative of the Irish national population. Herd expansion in the 2 years before, and the year that the survey was conducted was not associated with any of the management practices investigated. Fifty-three percent of respondents had an average calving season length of 10 to14 weeks with 35% of herds having a longer calving season. Previous research in cattle has documented that both colostrum source and feeding management are associated with the transmission of infectious disease from cow to calf. In the present study 60% of respondents fed calves colostrum from their own dam; however, 66% of those respondents allowed the calf to suckle the dam, 23% of survey respondents fed calves pooled colostrum. Larger herds were more likely (P<0.01) to use pooled colostrum supplies, while smaller herds were more likely (P<0.05) to allow the calf to suckle the dam. The majority (86%) of respondents had stored supplies of colostrum; average-sized herds had the greatest likelihood of storing colostrum (P<0.05), compared to other herd sizes; larger sized herds had a lesser likelihood (P<0.05) of storing colostrum in a freezer, compared to other herd sizes. Although freezing colostrum was the most common method used to store colostrum (54% of respondents), 17% of respondents stored colostrum at room temperature, 29% of which stored it at room temperature for greater than 4 days. The results from the present study indicate that a particular focus needs to be placed on calving and colostrum management because this study has highlighted a number of areas which are below international standards, and may have repercussions for calf health. Furthermore, management practices on larger farms could be improved and, as these represent the future of dairy farming, a focus needs to be placed on them. Expanding herds are not a particular concern as herd expansion, independent of herd size, does not seem to be associated with calving and colostrum management practices on Irish spring-calving dairy herds.

Keywords

dry periodcalvingcolostrumcalvesdairy
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Supplement 5 , May 2016 , pp. 868 - 877
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 2014. All Island Disease Surveillance Report 2014. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) and Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI). Retrieved on 18 July 2015 from http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/animalhealthwelfare/labservice/rvlreportpictures/2013%20AFBI-DAFM%20All-island%20Surveillance%20Report.pdf Google Scholar
Bao, J and Giller, P 1991. Observations on the changes in behavioral activities of dairy-cows prior to and after parturition. Irish Veterinary Journal 44, 43–47.Google Scholar
Beam, A, Lombard, J, Kopral, C, Garber, L, Winter, A, Hicks, J and Schlater, J 2009. Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 3973–3980.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Lee, JM, Macdonald, KA and Roche, JR 2007. Body condition score and body weight effects on dystocia and stillbirths and consequent effects on postcalving performance. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4201–4211.Google Scholar
Berry, DP, Wall, E and Pryce, JE 2014. Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle. animal 8, 105–121.Google Scholar
Besser, TE, Gay, C and Pritchett, L 1991. Comparison of three methods of feeding colostrum to dairy calves. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 198, 419–422.Google Scholar
Brignole, T and Stott, G 1980. Effect of suckling followed by bottle feeding colostrum on immunoglobulin absorption and calf survival. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 451–456.Google Scholar
Conneely, M, Berry, D, Murphy, J, Lorenz, I, Doherty, M and Kennedy, E 2014. Effect of feeding colostrum at different volumes and subsequent number of transition milk feeds on the serum immunoglobulin G concentration and health status of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 6991–7000.Google Scholar
Conneely, M, Berry, D, Sayers, R, Murphy, J, Lorenz, I, Doherty, M and Kennedy, E 2013. Factors associated with the concentration of immunoglobulin G in the colostrum of dairy cows. Animal 7, 1824–1832.Google Scholar
Edmonson, A, Lean, I, Weaver, L, Farver, T and Webster, G 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 68–78.Google Scholar
Godden, S 2008. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 19–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Good, M, Clegg, T, Sheridan, H, Yearsely, D, O’Brien, T, Egan, J and Mullowney, P 2009. Prevalence and distribution of paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease) in cattle herds in Ireland. Irish Veterinary Journal 62, 597–606.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, SM, Lie, KI, Løken, T and Østerås, O 2009a. Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2782–2795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulliksen, SM, Jor, E, Lie, KI, Hamnes, IS, Løken, T, Åkerstedt, J and Østerås, O 2009b. Enteropathogens and risk factors for diarrhea in Norwegian dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5057–5066.Google Scholar
Jago, J and Berry, DP 2011. Associations between herd size, rate of expansion and production, breeding policy and reproduction in spring-calving dairy herds. Animal 5, 1626–1633.Google Scholar
James, R, Polan, C and Cummins, K 1981. Influence of administered indigenous microorganisms on uptake of [Iodine-125] γ-Globulin in vivo by intestinal segments of Neonatal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 52–61.Google Scholar
Kennedy, AE, O’Doherty, EF, Byrne, N, O’Mahony, J, Kennedy, E and Sayers, RG 2014. A survey of management practices on Irish dairy farms with emphasis on risk factors for Johne’s disease transmission. Irish Veterinary Journal 67, 1–11.Google Scholar
Lombard, JE, Garry, FB, Tomlinson, SM and Garber, LP 2007. Impacts of dystocia on health and survival of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 1751–1760.Google Scholar
McGuirk, SM and Collins, M 2004. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 20, 593–603.Google Scholar
Mee, JF 2008. Newborn dairy calf management. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 1–17.Google Scholar
More, SJ, McKenzie, K, O’Flaherty, J, Doherty, ML, Cromie, AR, Magan, MJ 2010. Setting priorities for non-regulatory animal health in Ireland: results from an expert Policy Delphi study and a farmer priority identification survey. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 95, 198–207.Google Scholar
Mulligan, F and Doherty, M 2008. Production diseases of the transition cow. The Veterinary Journal 176, 3–9.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, S, Horan, B, Butler, A and Shalloo, L 2011. A survey of the factors affecting the future intentions of Irish dairy farmers. The Journal of Agricultural Science 149, 647–654.Google Scholar
O’Doherty, E, Sayers, R and O’Grady, L 2013. Temporal trends in bulk milk antibodies to Salmonella, Neospora caninum, and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo in Irish dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 109, 343–348.Google Scholar
Rastani, R, Grummer, R, Bertics, S, Gümen, A, Wiltbank, M, Mashek, D and Schwab, M 2005. Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1004–1014.Google Scholar
Stewart, S, Godden, S, Bey, R, Rapnicki, P, Fetrow, J, Farnsworth, R, Scanlon, M, Arnold, Y, Clow, L and Mueller, K 2005. Preventing bacterial contamination and proliferation during the harvest, storage, and feeding of fresh bovine colostrum. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2571–2578.Google Scholar
Sweeney, RW, Collins, MT, Koets, AP, McGuirk, SM and Roussel, AJ 2012. Paratuberculosis (Johne’s Disease) in cattle and other susceptible species. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 26, 1239–1250.Google Scholar
Teagasc 2013. Teagasc National Farm Survey-Dairy Enterprise. Retrieved on 19 July 2015 from http://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2014/3179/NFS_2013_final.pdf.Google Scholar
Tuyttens, FAM 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 261–282.Google Scholar
Vasseur, E, Borderas, F, Cue, R, Lefebvre, D, Pellerin, D, Rushen, J, Wade, K and De Passillé, A 2010. A survey of dairy calf management practices in Canada that affect animal welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1307–1316.Google Scholar
Weaver, DM, Tyler, JW, VanMetre, DC, Hostetler, DE and Barrington, GM 2000. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 14, 569–577.Google Scholar
Wells, S, Dargatz, D and Ott, S 1996. Factors associated with mortality to 21 days of life in dairy heifers in the United States. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 29, 9–19.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cummins supplementary material

Cummins supplementary material 1

Download Cummins supplementary material(File)
File 19.7 KB