Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:20:56.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prevalence of an inflammation and necrosis syndrome in suckling piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2019

G. Reiner ,
M. Lechner ,
A. Eisenack ,
K. Kallenbach ,
K. Rau ,
S. Müller  and
J. Fink-Gremmels
G. Reiner*
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Giessen, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392 Giessen, Germany
M. Lechner
Affiliation:
UEG Hohenlohe-Franken, Kraussenklinge 1, 97996 Adolzhausen-Niederstetten, Germany
A. Eisenack
Affiliation:
Veterinary Practitioner, Antoniusstr 38, 53909 Zülpich, Germany
K. Kallenbach
Affiliation:
Thuringian State Institute of Agriculture, Naumburger Str. 98, 07743 Jena, Germany
K. Rau
Affiliation:
Thuringian State Institute of Agriculture, Naumburger Str. 98, 07743 Jena, Germany
S. Müller
Affiliation:
Thuringian State Institute of Agriculture, Naumburger Str. 98, 07743 Jena, Germany
J. Fink-Gremmels
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, IRAS, Yalelaan 104, 3584 CM Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The current study describes the results obtained from clinical examination of over 4700 suckling piglets from 19 individual herds in Germany. In this cohort the prevalence of inflammation and necrosis in the tails, ears, claw coronary bands, heels and teats was determined using a pre-defined scoring system. Results show that already in the 1st days of life, piglets were affected by inflammation and necrosis of the heels (80%), claw coronary bands (50%) and tail base (20%). The praevalences of these alterations in piglets were influenced by genetics (P <0.001) and age, decreasing gradually in the 2nd week of life (P <0.001). Moreover, a correlation between tail length after tail docking and the prevalence of tail necrosis (P⩽0.04) was found. Tail and ear biting as a behavioural trait was not detected during this study. The early onset, appearance and multiple locations of clinical signs of inflammation and the positive correlation with the genetic background of the piglets may suggest an impairment of the innate immune system by infectious and non-infectious agents. This is in contrast to previously described behavioural abnormalities seen in fattening pigs. Considering the obvious reduction of animal welfare due to the described lesions, there is a need to create awareness among pig farmers and to understand the multifactorial causality involved in this inflammation and necrosis syndrome in piglets.

Keywords

pigstail necrosisgeneticsanimal welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 2007 - 2017
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casal-Plana, N, Manteca, X, Dalmau, A and Fabrega, E 2017. Influence of enrichment material and herbal compounds in the behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 195, 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’ Eath, RB, Arnott, G, Turner, SP, Jensen, T, Lahrmann, HP, Busch, ME, Niemi, JK, Lawrence, AB and Sandøe, P 2014. Injurious tail biting in pigs: how can it be controlled in existing systems without tail docking? Animal 8, 1479–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2007. Scientific opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from Commission on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. EFSA Journal 611, 1–13.Google Scholar
EFSA 2012. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal 10, 2767.Google Scholar
EFSA 2014. Scientific opinion concerning a multifactorial approach on the use of animal and non-animal-based measures to assess the welfare of pigs. EFSA Journal 12, 3702.Google Scholar
European Network of Centres of excellence for Animal Welfare report (ENCAW) 2016. European Network of Centers of Excellence for Animal Welfare. Retrieved on 15 November 2018 from https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/scaw/rapporter-efter-juni-2016/encaw-ii-final-report.pdf.Google Scholar
Lahrmann, HP, Busch, ME, D’Eath, RB, Forkman, B and Hansen, CF 2017. More tail lesions among undocked than tail docked pigs in a conventional herd. Animal 10, 1825–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, F, Lechner, M, Schrade, H and Reiner, G 2016. Swine Inflammation and Necrosis Syndrome (SINS) – a new syndrome related to tail biting in pigs. In Proceedings of the 24th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress (IPVS), 7–10 June 2016, Dublin, Ireland, p. 612.Google Scholar
Lingling, F, Bo, Z, Huizhi, L, Schinckel, AP, Tingting, L, Qingpo, C, Yuan, L and Feilong, X 2018. Teeth clipping, tail docking and toy enrichment affect physiological indicators, behaviour and lesions of weaned pigs after re-location and mixing. Livestock Science 212, 137–142.Google Scholar
Nannoni, E, Sardi, L, Vitali, M, Trevisi, E, Ferrari, A, Barone, F, Bacci, ML, Barbieri, S and Martelli, G 2016. Effects of different enrichment devices on some welfare indicators of post-weaned undocked piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 184, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasirahmadi, A, Edwards, SA, Metheson, SM and Sturm, B 2017. Using automated image analysis in pig behavioural research: assessment of the influence of enrichment substrate provision on lying behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 196, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papatsiros, V 2012. Ear necrosis syndrome in weaning pigs associated with PCV2 infection: a case report. Veterinary Research Forum. 3, 217–220.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, J., Friendschip, RM, Poliak, Z, DeKay, D and Slavic, D 2013. An investigation of ear necrosis in pigs. Canadian Veterinary Journal 54, 491–495.Google ScholarPubMed
Pejsak, Z, Markowska-Daniel, I, Pomorska-Mól, M, Porowski, M and Kołacz, R 2011. Ear necrosis reduction in pigs after vaccination against PCV2. Research in Veterinary Sciences 91, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penny, RHC, Edwards, MJ and Mulley, R 1971. Clinical observations of necrosis of skin of suckling piglets. Australian Veterinary Journal 47, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pringle, M, Backhans, A, Otman, F, Sjölund, M and Fellström, C 2009. Isolation of spirochetes of genus Treponema from pigs with ear necrosis. Veterinary Microbiology 18, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santi, M, Gheller, NB, Mores, TJ, Marques, BM, Gonçalves, MAD, Gava, D, Zlotowski, P, Driemeier, D and Barcellos, DESN 2008. Tail necrosis in piglets – case report. Retrieved on 15 November 2018 from http://hdl.handle.net/11299/155093.Google Scholar
Studnitz, M, Jensen, MB and Pedersen, LJ 2007. Why do pigs root and in what will they root? A review on exploratory behaviour of pigs in relation to environmental enrichment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, NR, Main, DCJ, Mendl, M and Edwards, SA 2010. Tail-biting: a new perspective. Veterinary Journal 186, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuchscherer, M, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A and Kanitz, E 2018. Psychosocial stress sensitizes neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses to Escherichia coli challenge in domestic piglets. Brain, Behavior and Immunity 68, 274–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vallance, TM, Zeuner, MT, Williams, HF, Widera, D and Vaiyapuri, S 2017. Toll-like receptor 4 signalling and its impact on platelet function, thrombosis, and haemostasis. Retrieved on 15 November 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9605894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valros, A, Ahlström, S, Rintala, H, Häkkinen, T and Saloniemi, H 2004. The prevalence of tail damage in slaughter pigs in Finland and associations to carcass condemnations. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science 54, 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Weerd, HA and Day, JEL 2009. A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Limbergen, T, Devreese, M, Croubels, S, Broekaert, N, Michiels, A, De Saeger, S and Dominiek Maes, D 2017. Role of mycotoxins in herds with and without problems with tail necrosis in neonatal pigs. Veterinary Record 181, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, P and Bilkei, G 2006. Tail-biting in outdoor pig production. Veterinary Journal 171, 367–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winfield, JA, Macnamara, GF, Macnamara, BLF, Hall, EJS, Ralph, CR, O´Shea, CJ and Cronin, GM 2017. Enviromental enrichment for sucker and weaner pigs: the effect of enrichment block shape on the behavioural interaction by pigs with the blocks. Animals 7, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissenbacher-Lang, C, Voglmayr, T, Waxenecker, F, Hofstetter, U, Weissenböck, H, Hoelzle, K, Hoelzle, LE, Welle, M, Ogris, M, Bruns, G and Ritzmann, M 2012. Porcine ear necrosis syndrome: a preliminary investigation of putative infectious agents in piglets and mycotoxins in feed. Veterinary Journal 194, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Reiner et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Reiner et al. supplementary material(File)
File 18.9 KB