Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:25:18.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential infection of grazing cattle via contaminated water: a theoretical modelling approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2019

S. S. Lewerin Open the ORCID record for S. S. Lewerin [Opens in a new window] ,
E. Sokolova ,
H. Wahlström ,
G. Lindström ,
C. Pers ,
J. Strömqvist  and
K. Sörén
S. S. Lewerin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Sciences & Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7036, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
E. Sokolova
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
H. Wahlström
Affiliation:
National Veterinary Institute, SE-751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
G. Lindström
Affiliation:
Research Department, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden
C. Pers
Affiliation:
Research Department, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden
J. Strömqvist
Affiliation:
Research Department, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden
K. Sörén
Affiliation:
National Veterinary Institute, SE-751 89 Uppsala, Sweden
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Wastewater discharge and agricultural activities may pose microbial risks to natural water sources. The impact of different sources can be assessed by water quality modelling. The aim of this study was to use hydrological and hydrodynamic models to illustrate the risk of exposing grazing animals to faecal pollutants in natural water sources, using three zoonotic faecal pathogens as model microbes and fictitious pastures in Sweden as examples. Microbial contamination by manure from fertilisation and grazing was modelled by use of a hydrological model (HYPE) and a hydrodynamic model (MIKE 3 FM), and microbial contamination from human wastewater was modelled by application of both models in a backwards process. The faecal pathogens Salmonella spp., verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 (VTEC) and Cryptosporidium parvum were chosen as model organisms. The pathogen loads on arable land and pastures were estimated based on pathogen concentration in cattle faeces, herd prevalence and within-herd prevalence. Contamination from human wastewater discharge was simulated by estimating the number of pathogens required from a fictitious wastewater discharge to reach a concentration high enough to cause infection in cattle using the points on the fictitious pastures as their primary source of drinking water. In the scenarios for pathogens from animal sources, none of the simulated concentrations of salmonella exceeded the concentrations needed to infect adult cattle. For VTEC, most of the simulated concentrations exceeded the concentration needed to infect calves. For C. parvum, all the simulated concentrations exceeded the concentration needed to infect calves. The pathogen loads needed at the release points for human wastewater to achieve infectious doses for cattle were mostly above the potential loads of salmonella and VTEC estimated to be present in a 24-h overflow from a medium-size Swedish wastewater treatment plant, while the required pathogen loads of C. parvum at the release points were below the potential loads of C. parvum in a 24-h wastewater overflow. Most estimates in this study assume a worst-case scenario. Controlling zoonotic infections at herd level prevents environmental contamination and subsequent human exposure. The potential for infection of grazing animals with faecal pathogens has implications for keeping animals on pastures with access to natural water sources. As the infectious dose for most pathogens is more easily reached for calves than for adult animals, and young calves are also the main shedders of C. parvum, keeping young calves on pastures adjacent to natural water sources is best avoided.

Keywords

SalmonellaCryptosporidiumbovinehydrologicalhydrodynamic
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 2052 - 2059
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aceto, H, Miller, SA and Smith, G 2011. Onset of diarrhea and pyrexia and time to detection of Salmonella enterica subsp enterica in feces in experimental studies of cattle, horses, goats, and sheep after infection per os. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 238, 1333–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ågren, ECC, Sternberg Lewerin, S, Wahlström, H, Emanuelson, U and Frössling, J 2016. Low prevalence of Salmonella in Swedish dairy herds highlight differences between serotypes. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 125, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besser, TE, Richards, BL, Rice, DH and Hancock, DD 2002. Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection of calves: infectious dose and direct contact transmission. Epidemiology and Infection 127, 555–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C, Lindstrom, L, Oweson, C, Ahola, H, Troell, K and Axen, C 2015. Cryptosporidium infections in suckler herd beef calves. Parasitology 142, 1108–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bougeard, M, Le Saux, JC, Pérenne, N, Baffaut, C, Robin, M and Pommepuy, M 2011. Modeling of Escherichia coli fluxes on a catchment and the impact on coastal water and shellfish quality. Journal of the American Water Resource Association 47, 350–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, SA, Morales, VL, Zhang, W, Harvey, RW, Packman, AI, Mohanram, A and Welty, C 2013. Transport and fate of microbial pathogens in agricultural settings. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 43, 775–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, KH, Pachepsky, YA, Oliver, DM, Muirhead, RW, Park, Y, Quilliam, RS and Shelton, DR 2016. Modeling fate and transport of fecally-derived microorganisms at the watershed scale: State of the science and future opportunities. Water Research 100, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, RG, Fenwick, SG, Nicol, CM, Marchant, RM, Swanney, S, Gill, JM, Holmes, JD, Leyland, M and Davies, PR 2004. Salmonella Brandenburg – emergence of a new strain affecting stock and humans in the South Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Constable, PD, Hinchcliff, KW, Done, SH and Grünberg, W (Editors) 2017. Veterinary medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats, 11th edition. Elsevier Ltd, St Louis, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Cray, WC Jr and Moon, HW 1995. Experimental infection of calves and adult cattle with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 1586–1590.Google ScholarPubMed
De Brauwere, A, Gourgue, O, de Brye, B, Servais, P, Ouattara, NK and Deleersnijder, E 2014a. Integrated modelling of faecal contamination in a densely populated river-sea continuum (Scheldt River and Estuary). Science of the Total Environment 468-469, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brauwere, A, Ouattara, NK and Servais, P 2014b. Modeling fecal indicator bacteria concentrations in natural surface waters: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 44, 2380–2453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienus, O, Sokolova, E, Nyström, F, Matussek, A, Löfgren, S, Blom, L, Pettersson, TJR and Lindgren, P-E 2016. Norovirus dynamics in wastewater discharges and in the recipient drinking water source: long-term monitoring and hydrodynamic modeling. Environmental Science and Technology 50, 10851–10858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El Boulani, A, Mimouni, R, Mannas, H, Hamadi, F and Chaouqy, N 2017. Salmonella in wastewater: identification, antibiotic resistance and the impact on the marine environment. In: Current topics in Salmonella and Salmonellosis (ed. M Mares). IntechOpen, London, United Kingdom https://doi.org/10.5772/67298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, R, Gordon, R, Joy, D and Lee, H 2004. Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters: a review of current watershed scale modeling approaches. Agricultural Water Management 70, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmali, MA, Gannon, V and Sargeant, JM 2010. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC). Veterinary Microbiology 140, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahti, E, Ivarsson, S, Ågren, E, Thelander, M, Sjöland, L, Eriksson, E, Aspan, A, Szanto, E, Löfdahl, S, Plym Forshell, L and Wahlström, H 2010. A prolonged outbreak of Salmonella. Reading affecting humans and animals in Sweden. Proceedings of I3S International Symposium on Salmonella and Salmonellosis, 21–28 June 2010, St Malo, France, pp. 333–335.Google Scholar
Lindström, G, Pers, CP, Rosberg, R, Strömqvist, J and Arheimer, B 2010. Development and test of the HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) model – a water quality model for different spatial scales. Hydrology Research 41, 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMinn, BR, Ashbolt, NJ and Korajkic, A 2017. Bacteriophages as indicators of faecal pollution and enteric virus removal. Letters in Applied Microbiology 65, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medema, GJ, Schets, FM, Teunis, PFM and Havelaar, AH 1998. Sedimentation of free and attached Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in water. Applied Environmental Microbiology 64, 4460–4466.Google ScholarPubMed
Oliver, DM, Porter, KDH, Pachepsky, YA, Muirhead, RW, Reaney, SM, Coffey, R, Kay, D, Milledge, DG, Hong, E, Anthony, SG, Page, T, Bloodworth, JW, Mellander, P-E, Carbonneau, PE, McGrane, SJ and Quilliam, RS 2016. Predicting microbial water quality with models: over-arching questions for managing risk in agricultural catchments. Science of the Total Environment 544, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottoson, J, Hansen, A, Westrell, T, Johansen, K, Norder, H and Stenström, TA 2006. Removal of noro- and enteroviruses, Giardia cysts, Cryptosporidium oocysts, and fecal indicators at four secondary wastewater treatment plants in Sweden. Water Environment Research 78, 828–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Public Health Agency of Sweden 2011. Cryptosporidium i Östersund: Smittskyddsinstitutets arbete med det dricksvattenburna utbrottet i Östersund 2010–2011 (in Swedish). Retrieved on 20 April 2018 from https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/6ba0208adacc460b8aa203fadea39292/cryptosporidium-i-ostersund.pdf.Google Scholar
Schönning, C, Westrell, T, Stenström, TA, Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K, Hasling, AB, Høibye, L and Carlsen, A 2007. Microbial risk assessment of local handling and use of human faeces. Journal of Water and Health 5, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverlås, C, Emanuelson, U, de Verdier, K and Björkman, C 2009. Prevalence and associated management factors of Cryptosporidium shedding in 50 Swedish dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 90, 242–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolova, E, Lindström, G, Pers, C, Strömqvist, J, Sternberg Lewerin, S, Wahlström, H and Sörén, K 2018. Water quality modelling: microbial risks associated with manure on pasture and arable land. Journal of Water and Health 16, 549–561.Google ScholarPubMed
Sokolova, E, Pettersson, TJR, Bergstedt, O and Hermansson, M 2013. Hydrodynamic modelling of the microbial water quality in a drinking water source as input for risk reduction management. Journal of Hydrology 497, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, J, Arheimer, B, Dahné, J, Donnelly, C and Lindström, G 2012. Water and nutrient predictions in ungauged basins – set-up and evaluation of a model at the national scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal 57, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundström, K 2010. Samhällskostnader för salmonellos, campylobacterios och EHEC. Bilaga 9 Betänkande Folkhälsa – Djurhälsa: Ny ansvarsfördelning mellan stat och näring. (SOU 2010:106, in Swedish). Retrieved on 20 April 2018 from http://www.regeringen.se/49bbab/contentassets/85bc16894e354a5ba40187238673aa51/folkhalsa---djurhalsa-ny-ansvarsfordelning-mellan-stat-och-naring-del-c-bilaga-9-sou-2010106.Google Scholar
SVA 2017. Surveillance of infectious diseases in animals and humans in Sweden 2016, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden. Retrieved on 20 April 2018 from http://www.sva.se/globalassets/redesign2011/pdf/om_sva/publikationer/surveillance-2016-w.pdf.Google Scholar
Vanselow, BA, Hum, S, Hornitzky, MA, Eamens, GJ and Quinn, K 2007. Salmonella typhimurium persistence in a Hunter Valley dairy herd. Australian Veterinary Journal 85, 446–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO 2018. Non-typhoidal salmonella. Retrieved on 20 April 2018 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs139/en/.Google Scholar
Yin, Y, Jiang, S, Pers, C, Yang, X, Liu, Q, Yuan, J, Yao, M, He, Y, Luo, X and Zheng, Z 2016. Assessment of the spatial and temporal variations of water quality for agricultural lands with crop rotation in China by using a HYPE model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, 336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zambriski, JA, Nydam, DV, Wilcox, ZJ, Bowman, DD, Mohammed, HO and Liotta, JL 2013. Cryptosporidium parvum: determination of ID50 and the dose-response relationship in experimentally challenged dairy calves. Veterinary Parasitology 197, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lewerin et al. supplementary material

Lewerin et al. supplementary material 1

Download Lewerin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 244.3 KB