Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:06:32.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physicochemical changes to starch granules during micronisation and extrusion processing of wheat, and their implications for starch digestibility in the newly weaned piglet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

G. A. White
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
F. J. Doucet
Affiliation:
Division of Food Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
S. E. Hill*
Affiliation:
Division of Food Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
Get access

Abstract

Two trials were performed to assess changes in the physicochemical properties of precisely processed (micronised v. extruded) wheats, prior to inclusion in piglet diets. The in vitro data obtained were subsequently related to biological responses of newly weaned piglets over 14 days. The effects of the severity of micronisation (Trial 1) or extrusion (Trial 2) on the nutritional value of two wheats (varying in endosperm texture) were examined. Extrusion, in contrast to micronisation, drastically disrupted the structural properties of wheat starch granules through melting of crystallites and macromolecular degradation of starch polysaccharides. These structural changes strongly improved the hydration characteristics of starch and its digestibility. The amount of starch digested in vitro was approximately 0.20, 0.70 and 0.90 for the unprocessed, micronised and extruded samples, respectively. This enhanced in vitro digestibility correlated well with, and helped to explain, the significant improvement in the apparent digestibility of starch at both the 0.5 region (mean coefficients for extruded wheat were 0.869 and 0.959 v. raw 0.392; P = 0.017) and 0.75 region (extruded 0.973 v. raw 0.809; P = 0.009) of the small intestine, when compared with piglets fed an unprocessed wheat diet. Extrusion and, to a lesser extent, micronisation lessened the reduction in apparent starch digestibility on day 4 post-weaning, typically seen at the 0.5 intestinal region in piglets fed an unprocessed wheat diet. Processing variables influenced both in vitro and in vivo data, with for instance, a positive relationship between specific mechanical energy (SME) input during extrusion and starch digestibility at the 0.5 region. The higher digestibility coefficient observed at the 0.5 region for the high SME diet suggests enhanced digestion and more rapid release of starch. However, it remains to be seen whether a diet containing rapidly digestible, as opposed to slowly digestible, starch is more beneficial for piglets. This rate of starch breakdown in the piglet is an important finding, which may have implications in helping to alleviate the post-weaning growth check, particularly in the absence of in-feed antibiotic growth promoters. Processing did not appear to offer any benefit over unprocessed wheat with regard to daily live-weight gain or the apparent digestibility of nitrogen in the small intestine over the 14-day period. Based on the enhanced in vivo starch digestibility, performance might be improved over a longer period, although future studies are required to confirm this. Precise processing variables for raw materials must be stated in all animal trials.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anguita, M, Gasa, J, Martin-Orue, SM, Perez, JF 2006. Study of the effect of technological processes on starch hydrolysis, nonstarch polysaccharides solubilisation and physicochemical properties of different ingredients using a twostep in vitro system. Animal Feed Science and Technology 129, 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bark, LJ, Crenshaw, TD, Leibbrandt, VD 1986. The effect of meal intervals and weaning on feed intake of early weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 62, 12331239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, A, Hill, SE, Mitchell, JR 2001. Milling – A further parameter affecting the Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) profile. Cereal Chemistry 78, 166172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindzus, W, Fayard, G, van Lengerich, B, Meuser, F 2002. Description of extrudate characteristics in relation to the shear stress of plasticised starches determined in-line. Starch Stärke 54, 252259.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, FJ, White, G, Wiseman, J, Sandra, SE 2007. Physicochemical changes to starch structure during processing of raw materials and their implications for starch digestibility in newly-weaned piglets. In Recent advances in animal nutrition – 2006 (ed. C Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 313330. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Englyst, HN, Cummings, JH 1987. Digestion of polysaccharides of potato in the small intestine of man. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 153, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasina, OO, Tyler, RT, Pickard, MD, Zheng, GH 1999. Infrared heating of hulless and pearled barley. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 23, 135151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, PJ, Donald, AM, Richmond, P 1996. Starch structure and functionality. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, AS 1969. Application of infra-red radiation in food processing. Leonard Hill Publ., London, UK.Google Scholar
Guha, M, Ali, SZ, Bhattacharya, S 1998. Effect of barrel temperature and screw speed on rapid viscoanalyser pasting behaviour of rice extrudate. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 33, 259266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinders, R, Eng, K 1970. Effect of grain sorghum type on starch degradation due to pressure cooking and micronising. Feedstuffs 42, 20.Google Scholar
Hongtrakul, K, Goodband, RD, Behnke, KC, Nelssen, JL, Tokach, MD, Bergstrom, JR, Nessmith, WB Jr, Kim, IH 1998. The effects of extrusion processing of carbohydrate sources on weanling pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 76, 30343042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoover, R, Vasanthan, T 1994. The effect of annealing on the physicochemical properties of wheat, oat, potato and lentil starches. Journal of Food Biochemistry 17, 303325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoseney, RC 1994. Principles of cereal science and technology, 2nd edition. AACC, St Paul, MN, pp. 142.Google Scholar
Huang, SX, Sauer, WC, Pickard, M, Li, S, Hardin, RT 1998. Effect of micronization on energy, starch and amino acid digestibility in hulless barley for young pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, H, Eerlingen, RC, Rouseu, N, Colonna, P, Delcour, JA 1998. Acid hydrolysis of native and annealed wheat, potato and pea starches – DSC melting features and chain length distributions of lintnerised starches. Carbohydrate Research 308, 359371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, CH, Rahman, S, Kortt, V, Higgins, TJV 1993. Characterisation of the wheat Mr 15000 grain softness protein and analysis of the relationship between its accumulation in the whole seed and grain softness. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86, 589597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D, Smyth, JA, McCracken, KJ 1991. Digestive development of the early weaned pig: effect of level of food intake on digestive enzyme activity during the immediate post-weaning period. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 181188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulp, K, Lorenz, K 1981. Heat-moisture treatment of starches. 1. Physicochemical properties. Cereal Chemistry 58, 4648.Google Scholar
Lawrence, TLJ 1973. An evaluation of the micronisation process for preparing cereal for the growing pig. 1. Effects on digestibility and nitrogen retention. Animal Production 16, 99107.Google Scholar
Lynch, PB, Zoccarato, I 1992. Effects of extrusion and steam flaking of cereals on growth rate and food utilization by weaned pigs. Animal Production 54, 452453.Google Scholar
Mitchell, JR, Hill, SE, Paterson, L, Valles, B, Barclay, F, Blanshard, JM 1997. The role of molecular weight in the conversion of starch. In Starch structure and functionality (ed. J Frazier, AM Donald and P Richmond). Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Ravi, R, Sai Manohar, R, Haridas Rao, P 1999. Use of Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) for measuring the pasting characteristics of wheat flour as influenced by additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 79, 15711576.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, JB, Choct, M, Pethick, DW 1999. Processing cereal grains for animal feeding. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 721736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusnak, BA, Chou, CL, Rooney, LW 1980. Effect of micronising on kernel characteristics of sorghum varieties with different endosperm type. Journal of Food Science 45, 15291532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruy, GH, Neumann, PE, Walker, CE 1993. Pasting of wheat flour extrudates containing conventional baking ingredients. Journal of Food Science 58, 567573.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Mosenthin, R, Pierce, AB 1990. The utilization of pelleted, extruded, and extruded and repelleted diets by early weaned pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 31, 269275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoch, ER, Binder, SF, Deyoe, CW, Allee, GL, Behnke, KC 1983. Effects of steam pelleting conditions and extrusion cooking on a swine diet containing wheat middlings. Journal of Animal Science 57, 929935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriburi, P, Hill, SE 2000. Extrusion of cassava starch with either variations in ascorbic acid concentration and pH. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 35, 141154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacker, PA 1999. Effect of micronisation on the performance of growing/finishing pigs fed diets based on hulled and hulless barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79, 2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turhan, M, Gunasekaran, S 2002. Kinetics of in situ and in vitro gelatinization of hard and soft wheat starches during cooking in water. Journal of Food Engineering 52, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Einde, RM, van der Goot, AJ, Boom, RM 2003. Understanding molecular weight reduction of starch during heating-shearing processes. Journal of Food Science 68, 23962404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Einde, RM, Akkermans, C, van der Goot, AJ, Boom, RM 2004. Molecular breakdown of corn starch by thermal and mechanical effects. Carbohydrate Polymers 56, 415422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Poel, AFB, Den Hartog, LA, Van Stiphout, WAA, Bremmers, R, Huisman, J 1990. Effects of extrusion of maize on ileal and faecal digestibility of nutrients and performance of young piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 29, 309320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellock, IJ, Fortomaris, PD, Houdijk, JGM, Kyriazakis, I 2007. Effect of weaning age, protein nutrition and enterotoxigenic E. coli challenge on the health of newly weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science 108, 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weurding, RE, Enting, H, Verstegen, MWA 2003. The effect of site of starch digestion on performance of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 110, 175184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White GA, Doucet FJ, Hill SE and Wiseman J 2008. Physicochemical properties and the nutritional quality of raw cereals for newly weaned piglets. Animal 2, 867–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkadas, LN, Wiseman, J 2001. Influence of processing variables during micronization of wheat on starch structure and subsequent performance and digestibility in weaned piglets fed wheat-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 93, 93107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarkadas, LN, Wiseman, J 2002. Influence of micronization temperature and pre-conditioning on performance and digestibility in piglets fed barley-based diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 95, 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar