Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:27:40.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional geometry of calcium and phosphorus nutrition in broiler chicks. Growth performance, skeletal health and intake arrays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2014

E. J. Bradbury ,
S. J. Wilkinson ,
G. M. Cronin ,
P. C. Thomson ,
M. R. Bedford  and
A. J. Cowieson
E. J. Bradbury
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
S. J. Wilkinson*
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
G. M. Cronin
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
P. C. Thomson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, 2570, Australia
M. R. Bedford
Affiliation:
AB Vista Feed Ingredients, Marlborough, Wiltshire, UK
A. J. Cowieson
Affiliation:
Poultry Research Foundation, The University of Sydney, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The interaction between calcium (Ca) and non-phytate phosphorus (nPP) in broiler nutrition and skeletal health is highly complex with many factors influencing their digestion, absorption and utilisation. The use of an investigative model such as the geometric framework allows a graphical approach to explore these complex interactions. A total of 600 Ross 308-day-old male broiler chicks were allocated to one of 15 dietary treatments with five replicates and eight birds per replicate. Dietary treatments were formulated to one of three total densities of total Ca+nPP; high (15 g/kg), medium (13.5 g/kg) and low (12 g/kg) and at each density there were five different ratios of Ca : nPP (4, 2.75, 2.1, 1.5 and 1.14 : 1). Weekly performance data was collected and at the end of the experiment birds were individually weighed and the right leg removed for tibia ash analysis. Skeletal health was assessed using the latency to lie (LTL) at day 27. At low Ca and high nPP as well as high Ca and low nPP diets, birds had reduced feed intake, BW gain, poorer feed efficiency and lower tibia ash, resulting in a significant interaction between dietary Ca and nPP (P<0.05). LTL times were negatively influenced by diets having either a broad ratio (high Ca, low nPP) or too narrow a ratio (low Ca, high nPP) indicating that shorter LTL times may be influenced by the ratio of Ca : nPP rather than absolute concentrations of either mineral. The calculated intake arrays show that broilers more closely regulate Ca intake than nPP intake. Broilers are willing to over consume nPP to defend a Ca intake target more so than they are willing to over consume Ca to defend an nPP target. Overall dietary nPP was more influential on performance metrics, however, from the data it may appear that birds prioritise Ca intake over nPP and broadly ate to meet this requirement. As broilers are more willing to eat to a Ca intake target rather than an nPP intake target, this emphasises the importance of formulating diets to a accurately balanced density of Ca : nPP considering the biological importance of both minerals.

Keywords

bone mineralisationbroilerscalciumgeometric frameworkphosphorus
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 7 , July 2014 , pp. 1071 - 1079
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, R, Tamim, NM, Applegate, TJ, Dhandu, AS and Ellestad, LE 2002. Phytic acid chemistry: influence on phytin-phosphorus availability and phytase efficacy. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 11, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C and Sanotra, GS 2003. Can a modified latency-to-lie test be used to validate gait-scoring results in commercial broiler flocks? Animal Welfare 12, 655–659.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, RH, Kirkden, RD and Broom, DM 2002. A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broielrs in relation to welfare. Avian and Poultry Biology Review 13, 45–103.Google Scholar
Cowieson, AJ, Acamovic, T and Bedford, MR 2004. The effects of phytase and phytic acid on the loss of endogenous amino acids and minerals from broiler chickens. British Poultry Abstracts 45, 101–108.Google Scholar
Danbury, TD, Weeks, CA, Chambers, JP, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Kestin, SC 2000. Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. The Veterinary Record 146, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhandu, AS and Angel, CR 2003. Broiler nonphytin phosphorus requirement in the finisher and withdrawal phases of a commercial four-phase feeding system. Poultry Science 82, 1257–1265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, AR and Dale, NM 2006. Foot ash as a means of quantifying bone mineralisation in chicks. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holcombe, DJ, Roland, DA and Harms, RH 1976. The ability of hens to regulate phosphorus intake when offered diets containing different levels of phosphorus. Poultry Science 55, 308–317.Google Scholar
Hughes, BO and Wood-Gush, DGM 1971. A Specific appetite for calcium in domestic chickens. Animal Behaviour 19, 490–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joshua, IG and Mueller, WJ 1979. The development of a specific appetite for calcium in growing broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 20, 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestin, SC, Adams, SJM and Gregory, NG 1994. Leg weakness in broiler chickens, a review of studies using gait scoring. Proceedings 9th European Poultry Conference, 7 to 12 August 1994, Glasgow, UK, pp. 203–206.Google Scholar
Lanyon, LE 1993. Skeletal responses to physical loading. In Handbook of experimental pharmacology: physiology and pharmacology of bone (ed. GR Mundy and TJ Martin), pp. 485–505. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Li, YC, Ledoux, DR, Veum, TL, Raboy, V and Ertl, DS 2000. Effects of low phytic acid corn on phosphorus utilisation, performance, and bone mineralisation in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 79, 1444–1450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, MW and Solvyns, A 1964. Dietary calcium levels and chicken growth. Proceedings of the Australasian Poultry Science Convention 1964. Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, pp. 112–116.Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council 2004. Australian code of practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 7th edition. Commonwealth Government of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia.Google Scholar
Nelson, TS, Harris, GC, Kirby, LK and Johnson, ZB 1990. Effects of calcium and phosphorus on the incidence of leg abnormalities in growing broilers. Poultry Science 69, 1496–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestor, KE and Emmerson, DA 1990. Role of genetics in expression and prevention of leg weakness. Proceedings of the Avian Skeletal Disease Symposium, 22nd July 1990, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America, pp. 14–21.Google Scholar
Plumstead, PW, Leytem, AB, Maguire, RO, Spears, JW, Kwanyuen, P and Brake, J 2008. Interaction of calcium and phytate in broiler diets. 1. Effects on apparent prececal digestibility and retention of phosphorus. Poultry Science 87, 449–458.Google Scholar
Pompeu, MA, Barbosa, VM, Martins, NRS, Baião, NC, Lara, LJC, Rocha, JSR and Miranda, DJA 2012. Nutritional aspects related to non-infectious diseases in locomotor systems of broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal 68, 669–678.Google Scholar
Rama Rao, SV, Raju, MVLN, Reddy, MR and Pavani, P 2006. Interaction between dietary calcium and non-phytate phosphorus levels on growth, bone mineralisation and mineral excretion in commercial broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 135–150.Google Scholar
Rath, NC, Huff, GR, Huff, WE and Balog, JM 2000. Factors regulating bone maturity and strength in poultry. Poultry Science 79, 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raubenheimer, D and Simpson, S 2006. The challenge of supplementar feeding: can geometric analysis help save the kakapo? Notornis 53, 100–111.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Rousseau, X, Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Même, N, Magnin, M, Nys, Y and Narcy, A 2012. Phosphorus utilization in finishing broiler chickens: effects of dietary calcium and microbial phytase. Poultry Science 91, 2829–2837.Google Scholar
Selle, PH and Ravindran, V 2007. Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selle, PH, Cowieson, AJ and Ravindran, V 2009. Consequence of calcium interactions with phytate and phytase for poultry and pigs. Livestock Science 124, 126–141.Google Scholar
Selle, PH, Ravindran, V, Cowieson, AJ and Bedford, MR 2011. Phytate and phytase. In Enzymes in farm animal nutrition, 2nd edition (ed. MR Bedford and GG Partridge), pp. 160–205. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Shafey, TM 1993. Calcium tolerance of growing chickens: effect of ratio of dietary calcium to avaliable phosphorus. World’s Poultry Science Journal 49, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim, MY, Karnuah, AB, Mitchell, AD, Anthony, NB, Pesti, GM and Aggrey, SE 2012. The effects of growth rate on leg morphology and tibia breaking strength, mineral density, mineral content, and bone ash in broilers. Poultry Science 91, 1790–1795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, S and Raubenheimer, D 2011. The nature of nutrition: a unifying framework. Australian Journal of Zoology 59, 350–368.Google Scholar
Tamim, NM and Angel, R 2003. Phytate phosphorus hydrolysis as influenced by dietary calcium and micro-mineral source in broiler diets. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51, 4687–4693.Google Scholar
Tamim, NM, Angel, R and Christman, M 2004. Influence of dietary calcium and phytase on phytate phosphorus hydrolysis in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 83, 1358–1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, KS and Sanotra, GS 1999. Relationships between leg disorders and changes in the behaviour of broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 144, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veum, TL 2010. Phosphorus and calcium nutrition and metabolism. In Phosphorus and calcium utilisation and requirements in farm animals (ed. DMSS Vitti and E Kebreab), pp. 94–111. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Waldenstedt, L 2006. Nutritional factors of importance for optimal health in broilers: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 291–307.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, SJ, Selle, PH, Bedford, MR and Cowieson, AJ 2011. Exploiting calcium-specific appetite in poultry nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal 67, 587–598.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, SJ, Bradbury, EJ, Thomson, PC, Bedford, MR and Cowieson, AJ 2014. Nutritional geometry of calcium and phosphorus nutrition in broiler chicks. The effect of different dietary calcium and phosphorus concentrations and ratios on nutrient digestibility. Animal, published online doi:10.1017/S1751731114001049.Google Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM and Kare, MR 1966. The behaviour of calcium-deficient chickens. British Poultry Science 7, 285–290.Google Scholar
Yalcin, S, Özkan, S, Coskuner, E, Bilgen, G, Delen, Y, Kurtulmus, Y and Tanyalcin, T 2001. Effects of strain, maternal age and sex on morphological characteristics and composition of tibial bone in broilers. British Poultry Science 42, 184–190.Google Scholar
Yan, F, Kersey, JH and Waldroup, PW 2001. Phosphorus requirements of broiler chicks three to six weeks of age as influenced by phytase supplementation. Poultry Science 80, 455–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed