Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:01:43.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Milk: the new white gold? Milk production options for smallholder farmers in Southern Mali

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2015

N. de Ridder
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
O. M. Sanogo
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER), ESPGRN-Sikasso, PO Box 186, Sikasso, Mali
M. C. Rufino*
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya
H. van Keulen
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
K. E. Giller
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems group, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Until the turn of the century, farmers in West Africa considered cotton to be the ‘white gold’ for their livelihoods. Large fluctuations in cotton prices have led farmers to innovate into other business including dairy. Yet the productivity of cows fed traditional diets is very poor, especially during the long dry season. This study combines earlier published results of farmer participatory experiments with simulation modelling to evaluate the lifetime productivity of cows under varying feeding strategies and the resulting economic performance at farm level. We compared the profitability of cotton production to the innovation of dairy. The results show that milk production of the West African Méré breed could be expanded if cows are supplemented and kept stall-fed during the dry season. This option seems to be profitable for better-off farmers, but whether dairy will replace (some of) the role of cotton as the white gold for these smallholder farmers will depend on the cross price elasticity of cotton and milk. Farmers may (partly) replace cotton production for fodder production to produce milk if the price of cotton remains poor (below US$0.35/kg) and the milk price relatively strong (higher than US$0.38/kg). Price ratios need to remain stable over several seasons given the investments required for a change in production strategy. Furthermore, farmers will only seize the opportunity to engage in dairy if marketing infrastructure and milk markets are further developed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Deceased.

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Response to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Bosma, RH, Dembele, A and Kanté, I 1997. Contribution de la stabulation saisonnière des bovins à la durabilité du système de production agricole du Mali Sud. Sécheresse 8, 712.Google Scholar
Conrad, HR 1966. Symposium on factors influencing voluntary intake of herbage by ruminants: physiological and physical factors limiting feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 25, 227243.Google Scholar
Coulibaly, D 2008. Changements socio-techniques dans les systems de production laitière et commercialsiation du lait en zone péri-urbaine de Sikasso, Mali. PhD thesis, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.Google Scholar
De Ridder, N, Breman, H, van Keulen, H and Stomph, TJ 2004. Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the West African Sahel. Agricultural Systems 80, 109131.Google Scholar
Doumbia, D, van Paassen, A, Oosting, SJ and van der Zijpp, AJ 2012. Livestock in the rice-based economy of Office du Niger: the development potential for increased crop-livestock integration through multi-actor processes. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 60–63, 101114.Google Scholar
Felius, M 1995. Cattle breeds: an encyclopedia. Misset, Doetinchem, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Tittonell, P, Rufino, MC, van Wijk, MT, Zingore, S, Mapfumo, P, Adjei-Nsiah, S, Herrero, M, Chikowo, R, Corbeels, M, Rowe, EC, Baijukya, F, Mwijage, A, Smith, J, Yeboah, E, van der Burg, WJ, Sanogo, OM, Misiko, M, de Ridder, N, Karanja, S, Kaizzi, C, K’ungu, J, Mwale, M, Nwaga, D, Pacini, C and Vanlauwe, B 2011. Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agricultural Systems 104, 191203.Google Scholar
Konandreas, PA and Anderson, FM 1982. Cattle herd dynamics: an integer and stochastic model for evaluating production alternatives (Report 2. International Livestock Center for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Lalba, A and Dickey, J 1996. Effets d’une complémentation à base de tourteaux de coton. Quelques paramètres de productivité des vaches allaintantes dans un système de production agro-pastoral dans l’Ouest du Burkina Faso. Agricultural Systems in Africa 4, 516.Google Scholar
Monts, MAG 1960. Observations of milk yield, and calf growth and conversion rate, on three types of Cattle in Ghana. Tropical Agriculture 37, 293302.Google Scholar
Penning de Vries, FWT and Djitèye, MA 1982. La Productivité des Pâturages Sahéliens. PUDOC, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Porter, V and Mason, IL 2002. Mason’s world dictionary of livestock breeds, types and varieties. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Rietveld, A 2009. Livelihood strategies in a globalizing world. Analysis of farmers’ strategies in Southern Mali with emphasis on milk production. MSc thesis Rural Sociology and Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Herrero, M, van Wijk, MT, van Hemerik, L, de Ridder, N and Giller, KE 2009. Lifetime productivity of dairy cows in smallholder mixed systems of the Central highlands of Kenya. Animal 3, 10441056.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Dury, J, Tittonell, P, van Wijk, MT, Herrero, M, Zingore, S, Mapfumo, P and Giller, KE 2011. Competing use of organic resources, village-level interactions between farm types and climate variability in a communal area of NE Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems 104, 175190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanogo, OM 2010. Évaluation participative des technologies de supplémentation des vaches laitières en milieu paysan au Mali (Koutiala). Revue Canadienne d'études du Développement 31, 91106.Google Scholar
Sanogo, OM 2011. Le lait de l’or blanc? Amélioration de la productivité des exploitations mixtes culture-élevage à travers une meilleure gestion et alimentation des vaches laitières dans la zone de Koutiala, Mali. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Sanogo, OM, de Ridder, N and van Keulen, H 2010. Diversité et dynamique des exploitations agricoles mixtes agriculture-élevage au sud du Mali. Cahiers Agricultures 19, 185193.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, GWJ, de Ridder, N, van Keulen, H and van Ittersum, MK 2003. Concepts in production ecology for analysis and design of animal and plant-animal production systems. Agricultural Systems 76, 507525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wijk, MT, Tittonell, P, Rufino, MC, Herrero, M, Pacini, C, de Ridder, N, Giller, KE 2009. Identifying key entry-points for strategic management of smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa using the dynamic farm-scale simulation model NUANCES-FARMSIM. Agricultural Systems 102, 89101.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, KT, Diallo, A and Sayers, AR 1986. Productivity of transhumant Fulani cattle in the inner Niger Delta of Mali. ILCA Research Report No 13, International Livestock Center for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Yapi Gnaoré, CV, Oya, BA and Ouattara, Z 1996. Revue de la situation des races d’animaux domestiques de Côte d’Ivoire. Bulletin d’Information des Resources Génétiques Animales 19, 100108. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://www4.fao.org/cgi-bin/faobib.exe?vq_query=A%3DYapi-Gnaore,%20C.V.&database=faobib&search_type=view_query_search&format_name=@ELMON&sort_name=@SCHR&table=mona&page_header=ephmon&lang=eng.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

de Ridder supplementary material

de Ridder supplementary material 1

Download de Ridder supplementary material(File)
File 640.6 KB