Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T09:00:35.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meta-analysis of phosphorus utilisation by broilers receiving corn-soyabean meal diets: influence of dietary calcium and microbial phytase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2010

M. P. Létourneau-Montminy
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F–37380 Nouzilly, France BASF Nutrition Animale, F–53200 Château–Gontier, France
A. Narcy*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F–37380 Nouzilly, France
P. Lescoat
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F–37380 Nouzilly, France
J. F. Bernier
Affiliation:
Département des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Québec, G1V 0A6, QC, Canada
M. Magnin
Affiliation:
BASF Nutrition Animale, F–53200 Château–Gontier, France
C. Pomar
Affiliation:
Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada, Sherbrooke, J1M 1Z3, QC, Canada
Y. Nys
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F–37380 Nouzilly, France
D. Sauvant
Affiliation:
INRA, AgroParisTech, UMR791 Physiologie de la Nutritionet alimentation, F–75231 Paris, France
C. Jondreville
Affiliation:
INRA, Nancy–Université, USC 340 Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, F–54500 Vandoeuvre–lès–Nancy, France
*
Get access

Abstract

Pollution relative to phosphorus excretion in poultry manure as well as the soaring prices of phosphate, a non-renewable resource, remain of major importance. Thus, a good understanding of bird response regarding dietary phosphorus (P) is a prerequisite to optimise the utilisation of this essential element in broiler diets. A database built from 15 experiments with 203 treatments was used to predict the response of 21-day-old broilers to dietary non-phytate P (NPP), taking into account the main factors of variation, calcium (Ca) and microbial phytase derived from Aspergillus niger, in terms of average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily gain (ADG), gain to feed (G:F) and tibia ash concentration. All criteria evolve linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.001) with dietary NPP concentration. Dietary Ca affected the intercept and linear component for ADG (P < 0.01), G:F (P < 0.05) and tibia ash concentration (P < 0.001), whereas for ADFI, it affected only the intercept (P < 0.01). Microbial phytase addition impacted on the intercept, the linear and the quadratic coefficient for ADFI (P < 0.01), ADG (P < 0.001) and G:F (P < 0.05), and on the intercept and the linear component (P < 0.001) for tibia ash concentration. An evaluation of these models was then performed on a database built from 28 experiments and 255 treatments that were not used to perform the models. Results showed that ADFI, ADG and Tibia ash concentration were predicted fairly well (slope and intercept did not deviate from 0 to 1, respectively), whereas this was not the case for G:F. The increase in dietary Ca concentration aggravated P deficiency for all criteria while phytase addition had a positive effect. The more P deficiency was marked, the more the bird response to ADFI, ADG, G:F and tibia ash concentration was exacerbated. It must also be considered that even if the decrease in dietary Ca may improve P utilisation, it could in turn become limiting for bone mineralisation. In conclusion, this meta-analysis provides ways to reduce dietary P in broiler diets without impairing performance, taking into account dietary Ca and microbial phytase.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adedokun, SA, Sands, JS, Adeola, O 2004. Determining the equivalent phosphorus released by an Escherichia coli-derived phytase in broilers chicks. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 84, 437444.Google Scholar
Al-Masri, MR 1995. Absorption and endogenous excretion of phosphorus in growing broiler chicks, as influenced by calcium and phosphorus ratios in feed. The British Journal of Nutrition 74, 407415.Google Scholar
Augspurger, NR, Baker, DH 2004. High dietary phytase levels maximize phytate-phosphorus utilization but do not affect protein utilization in chicks fed phosphorus- or amino acid-deficient diets. Journal of Animal Science 82, 11001107.Google Scholar
Augspurger, NI, Webel, DM, Lei, XG, Baker, DH 2003. Efficacy of an E. coli phytase expressed in yeast for releasing phytate-bound phosphorus in young chicks and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 474483.Google Scholar
Boling, SD, Douglas, MW, Johnson, ML, Wang, X, Parsons, CM, Koelkebeck, KW, Zimmerman, RA 2000. The effects of dietary available phosphorus levels and phytase on performance of young and older laying hens. Poultry Science 79, 224230.Google Scholar
Denbow, DM, Ravindran, V, Kornegay, ET, Yi, Z, Hulet, RM 1995. Improving phosphorus availability in soybean meal for broilers by supplemental phytase. Poultry Science 74, 18311842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilger, RN, Onyango, EM, Sands, JS, Adeola, O 2004. Evaluation of microbial phytase in broiler diets. Poultry Science 83, 962970.Google Scholar
Driver, JP, Pesti, GM, Bakalli, RI, Edwards, JHM 2005. Effects of calcium and nonphytate phosphorus concentrations on phytase efficacy in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 84, 14061417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurwitz, S, Bar, A 1971. Calcium and phosphorus interrelationships in the intestine of the fowl. The Journal of Nutrition 101, 677686.Google Scholar
INRA 1989. L’alimentation des animaux monogastriques: Porc, Lapin, Volailles Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Jendza, JA, Dilger, RN, Sands, JS, Adeola, O 2006. Efficacy and equivalency of an Escherichia coli-derived phytase for replacing inorganic phosphorus in the diets of broiler chickens and young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 33643374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornegay, ET, Denbow, DM, Yi, Z, Ravindran, V 1996. Response of broilers to graded levels of microbial phytase added to maize-soybean-meal-based diets containing three levels of non-phytate phosphorus. The British Journal of Nutrition 75, 839852.Google Scholar
Larbier, M, Leclercq, B 1992. Nutrition et alimentation des volailles. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Lima, FR, Mendoca, CX, Alvarez, JC, Garzillo, JMF, Ghion, E, Leal, PM 1997. Biological evaluations of commercial dicalcium phosphate as sources of available phosphorus for broiler chicks. Poultry Science 76, 17071713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Lescoat, P, Narcy, A, Sauvant, D, Bernier, JF, Magnin, M, Pomar, C, Nys, Y, Jondreville, C 2008. Effect of reduced dietary calcium and phytase supplementation on calcium and phosphorus utilisation in broilers with modified mineral status. British Poultry Science 49, 709715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minitab 2007. Minitab version 15.1.1.0. for Windows. In Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RD, Edwards, HM 1996a. Additive effects of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol and phytase on phytate phosphorus utilization and related parameters in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 75, 111119.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RD, Edwards, HM 1996b. Effects of phytase and 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol on phytate utilization and the quantitative requirements for calcium and phosphorus in young broiler chickens. Poultry Science 75, 95110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narcy, A, Létourneau-Montminy, MP, Lescoat, P, Magnin, M, Nys, Y 2009. Effect of dietary calcium and phytase supplementation on phosphorus utilisation in chicks, Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Nelson, TS, Kirby, LK, Johnson, ZB 1990a. The relative biological value of feed phosphates for chicks. Poultry Science 69, 113118.Google Scholar
Nelson, TS, Harris, GC, Kirby, LK, Johnson, ZB 1990b. Effect of calcium and phosphorus on the incidence of leg abnormalities in growing broilers. Poultry Science 69, 14961502.Google Scholar
Nelson, TS, Hargus, WA, Storer, N, Walker, AC 1965. The influences of calcium and phosphorus utilisation in chicks. Poultry Science 44, 15081513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Offner, A, Sauvant, D 2004. Comparative evaluation of the Molly, CNCPS, and LES rumen models. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 107130.Google Scholar
Persia, ME, Saylor, WW 2006. Effects of broiler strain, dietary nonphytate phosphorus, and phytase supplementation on chick performance and tibia ash. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15, 7281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillai, PB, O’Connor-Dennie, T, Owens, CM, Emmert, JL 2006. Efficacy of an Escherichia coli phytase in broilers fed adequate or reduced phosphorus diets and its effect on carcass characteristics. Poultry Science 85, 17371745.Google Scholar
Qian, H, Kornegay, ET, Denbow, DM 1997. Utilization of phytate phosphorus and calcium as influenced by microbial phytase, cholecalciferol, and the calcium: total phosphorus ratio in broilers diets. Poultry Science 76, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rama Rao, SV, Raju, MVLN, Reddy, MR, Pavani, P 2006. Interaction between dietary calcium and non-phytate phosphorus levels on growth, bone mineralization and mineral excretion in commercial broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 135150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS (Statistical Analysis System) 2002. Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM, Tran, G 2004. Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d’élevage: porcs, volailles, bovins, ovins, caprins, lapins, chevaux, poissons. INRA Editions, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, JJ, St-Pierre, N 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data: application in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 12031214.Google Scholar
Sebastian, S, Touchburn, SP, Chavez, ER, Lague, PC 1996. Efficacy of supplemental microbial phytase at different dietary calcium levels on growth performance and mineral utilization of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 75, 15161523.Google Scholar
Selle, PH, Ravindran, V 2007. Microbial phytase in poultry nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 135, 141.Google Scholar
Timmons, JR, Harter-Dennis, JM, Sefton, AE 2004. Evaluation of nonunifrom application of phytase (simulated) on growth performance and bone quality in broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 13, 311318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, EJ, Suttle, NF 1999. The mineral nutrition of livestock. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveros, A, Brenes, A, Arija, I, Centeno, C 2002. Effects of microbial phytase supplementation on mineral utilization and serum enzyme activities in broiler chicks fed different levels of phosphorus. Poultry Science 81, 11721183.Google Scholar
Waldroup, AL, Ammerman, CB, Harms, CH 1963. The relationship of phosphorus, calcium, and vitamin D3 in the diet of broiler type chickens. Poultry Science 42, 982989.Google Scholar
Waldroup, PW, Kersey, JH, Saleh, EA, Fritts, CA, Yan, F, Stilborn, HL, Crum, RC, Raboy, V 2000. Nonphytate phosphorus requirement and phosphorus excretion of broiler chicks fed diets composed of normal or high available phosphate corn with and without microbial phytase. Poultry Science 79, 14511459.Google Scholar
WPSA 1985. Mineral requirements for poultry- mineral requirements and recommendations for growing birds. World’s Poultry Science Journal 41, 252258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, F, Fritts, CA, Waldroup, PW 2003. Evaluation of modified dietary phosphorus levels with and without phytase supplementation on live performance and fecal phosphorus levels in broiler diets. 1. Full-term feeding recommandations. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 12, 174182.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M, Hoshii, H 1977. Improvement of biological assay to determine available phosphorus with growing chicks. Japanese Poultry Science 14, 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B, Jan, YC, Chung, TK, Lee, TT, Chiou, PWS 2004. Exogenous phytase activity in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 117, 295303.Google Scholar