Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:31:48.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incubation and hatch management: consequences for bone mineralization in Cobb 500 meat chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

W. I. Muir  and
P. J. Groves
W. I. Muir*
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
P. J. Groves
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

From ~35 days of age fast growing meat chickens spend extended periods sitting or lying and less time standing. In a fast-feathering parent line lower early incubation temperatures which delayed chick hatch time, improved bone ash and extended their standing time. This incubation study assessed the consequences of incubation temperatures, hatch time and chick management at hatch/take off on femoral bone ash (BA) in Cobb 500 meat chickens. Embryos were incubated under either Control (between 37.8°C and 38.2°C egg shell temperature (EST)) or a Slow start (from 37.2°C at sett (the start of incubation), reaching 37.8°C EST at day 13 incubation), temperatures. Hatched chicks were identified at 492 h (20.5 days of incubation – classified as early (E)) or, between >492 and ⩽516 h (>20.5 and ⩽21.5 days of incubation – classified as late (L)), from setting. The E hatch chicks were allocated across three post-hatch treatments; treatment 1: E hatch chicks that were sampled E at 492 h from setting; treatment 2: E hatch chicks that were fed for a further 24 h in a floorpen before being sampled L at 516 h from setting; treatment 3: E hatch chicks that spent a further 24 h in the incubator before being sampled L at 516 h from setting. All L hatch chicks formed one treatment group which was sampled L at 516 h (i.e. L hatch chicks sampled L). It is not possible to sample L hatching chicks E hence this treatment is absent from the experimental design. Slow start incubation resulted in a higher total hatch percentage with a greater proportion of chicks hatching L, compared with the Control incubation. The L hatching chicks had significantly higher BA than the E hatching chicks. Of the E hatching chicks, those sampled both E and L had significantly lower BA than E hatching chicks fed for 24 h before L sampling. The E hatch, fed and sampled L chicks had the numerically highest BA, which was not significantly different from the BA of the L hatching chicks sampled L These results demonstrate that BA at hatch can be improved, either by extending the incubation period through a Slow start incubation profile, inducing L hatch, or alternatively, via the prompt provision of feed to E hatching chicks.

Keywords

chick take-offchickshatch windowleg strengthbroiler
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , April 2018 , pp. 794 - 801
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angel, R 2007. Metabolic disorders: limitations to growth of and mineral deposition into the broiler skeleton after hatch and potential implications for leg problems. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16, 138–149.Google Scholar
Brookes, M and May, KU 1972. The influence of temperature on bone growth in the chick. Journal of Anatomy 111, 351–363.Google Scholar
Cobb-Vantress 2016. Geneticists play important role in breeder selection. Retrieved on 9 January 2017 from http://www.cobb-vantress.com/academy/articles/article/academy/2016/07/19/geneticists-play-important-role-in-breeder-selection Google Scholar
Danbury, TC, Weeks, CA, Chambers, JP, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Kestin, SC 2000. Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. The Veterinary Record 146, 307–311.Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS, Donnelly, CA and Jones, TA 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427, 342–344.Google Scholar
Decuypere, E, Tona, K, Bruggeman, V and Bamelis, F 2001. The day-old chick: a crucial hinge between breeders and broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal 57, 127–138.Google Scholar
French, NA 1997. Modeling incubation temperature: the effects of incubator design, embryonic development and egg size. Poultry Science 76, 124–133.Google Scholar
French, NA 2000. Effect of short periods of high incubation temperature on hatchability and incidence of embryo pathology of turkey eggs. British Poultry Science 41, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2013. Use of perches by broiler chickens in floor pen experiments. Proceedings of the IX European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 17–20 June 2013, Uppsala, Sweden, p. 43.Google Scholar
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2014. A meta-analysis of experiments linking incubation conditions with subsequent leg weakness in broiler chickens. PLoS One 9, 102682.Google Scholar
Groves, PJ and Muir, WI 2017. Earlier hatching time predisposes Cobb broiler chickens to tibial dyschondroplasia. Animal 11, 112–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, CL, Simbi, BH and Stickland, NC 2007. In-ovo temperature manipulation influences embryonic motility and growth of limb tissues in the chick (Gallus gallus) . The Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 2667–2675.Google Scholar
Hill, D 2008. Quality analysis program. In Quality Manual pp. 5–23. HatchTech B.V., Veenendaal, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ipek, A, Sahan, U, Baycan, SC and Sozcu, A 2014. The effects of different eggshell temperatures on embryonic development, hatchability, chick quality, and first week broiler performance. Poultry Science 93, 464–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ipek, A and Sozcu, A 2016. The effects of egg-shell temperature fluctuations during incubation on welfare status and gait score of broilers. Poultry Science 95, 1296–1303.Google Scholar
Joseph, NS, Lourens, A and Moran, ET 2006. The effects of suboptimal eggshell temperature during incubation on broiler chick quality, live performance and further processing yield. Poultry Science 85, 932–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, SC, Knowles, TG, Tinch, AE and Gregory, NG 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. The Veterinary Record 131, 190–194.Google Scholar
Knowles, TG, Kestin, SC, Haslam, SM, Brown, SN, Green, LE, Butterworth, A, Pope, SJ, Pfeiffer, D and Nicol, CJ 2008. Leg disorders in broiler chickens: prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS One 3, e1545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molenaar, R 2010. Perinatal development and nutrient utilization in chickens - Effects of incubation conditions. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Molenaar, R, Gooding, T, Lamot, D, Wijtten, PJA, van der Pol, CW, Maatjens, CM and van Roovert-Reijrink, IAM 2014. Incubation and brooding conditions essential for the optimization of neonatal nutrition. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 25, 16–19 February 2014, Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
Molenaar, R, Reijrink, IAM, Meijerhof, R and Van den Brand, H 2010. Meeting embryonic requirements of broilers throughout incubation: a review. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 12, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Small, J, Wineland, MJ, Christensen, VL, Grimes, JL, Funderburk, SVL, Ort, DT and Mann, KM 2008a. Effects of incubator temperature and oxygen concentration during the plateau stage of oxygen consumption on turkey embryo long bone development. Poultry Science 87, 1484–1492.Google Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Small, J, Wineland, MJ, Christensen, VL, Mozdziak, PS, Koci, MD, Funderburk, SVL, Ort, DT and Mann, KM 2008b. Broiler embryo bone development is influenced by incubator temperature, oxygen concentration and eggshell conductance at the plateau stage in oxygen consumption. British Poultry Science 49, 666–676.Google Scholar
Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Wineland, MJ, Small, J, Cutchin, H, McElroy, A, Barri, A and Martin, S 2009. Effect of incubation temperatures and chick transportation conditions on bone development and leg health. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 18, 671–678.Google Scholar
Sacranie, A, van Gerwe, T, De Los Mozos, J, Gutierrez Dell Alamo, A, Cowieson, AJ and Enting, H 2013. Interaction between dietary phytase, calcium and digestible phosphorus levels on performance and tibia ash in broilers. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 24, 17–20 February 2013, Sydney, NSW, Australia, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Lawson, LG, Vestergaard, KS and Thomsen, MG 2001. Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness, and tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4, 71–87.Google Scholar
Shim, MY and Pesti, GM 2011. Effects of incubation temperature on bone development of broilers. Poultry Science 90, 1867–1877.Google Scholar
Tona, K, Onagbesan, OM, Kamers, B, Everaert, N, Bruggeman, V and Decuypere, E 2010. Comparison of Cobb and Ross strains in embryo physiology and chick juvenile growth. Poultry Science 89, 1677–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Ven, LJF, van Wagenberg, AV, Groot Koerkamp, PWG, Kemp, B and van den Brand, H 2009. Effects of a combined hatching and brooding system on hatchability, chick weight and mortality in broilers. Poultry Science 88, 2273–2279.Google Scholar
van der Pol, CW, van Roovert-Reijrink, IAM, Maatjens, CM, van den Anker, I, Kemp, B and van den Brand, H 2014. Effect of eggshell temperature throughout incubation on broiler hatchling leg bone development. Poultry Science 93, 2878–2883.Google Scholar
van Roovert-Reijrink, I 2014. The most important benefits of early feeding after hatch. International Hatchery Practice 28, 12–13.Google Scholar
Ventura, BA, Siewerdt, F and Estevez, I 2010. Effects of barrier perches and density on broiler leg health, fear, and performance. Poultry Science 89, 1574–1583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, KS and Sanotra, GS 1999. Relationships between leg disorders and changes in behaviour of broiler chickens. The Veterinary Record 144, 205–209.Google Scholar
Vieira, SL 2007. Chick embryo utilization of egg micronutrients. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 9, 1–8.Google Scholar
Yair, R, Shahar, R and Uni, Z 2015. In ovo feeding with minerals and vitamin D3 improves bone properties in hatchlings and mature broilers. Poultry Science 94, 2695–2707.Google Scholar