Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:11:36.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of fibre intake and fibre source on digestibility, gut development, retention time and growth performance of indigenous and exotic pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2012

T. T. B. Ngoc ,
N. T. Len  and
J. E. Lindberg
T. T. B. Ngoc
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage, National Institute of Animal Sciences, Hanoi, Vietnam Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
N. T. Len
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi, Vietnam
J. E. Lindberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7024, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The impact of fibre level and fibre source on digestibility, gastrointestinal tract (GIT) development, total tract mean retention time (MRT) and growth performance was studied in indigenous Mong Cai (MC) and exotic Landrace × Yorkshire (LY) pigs. The diets were based on maize, rice bran, soyabean meal, fish meal and soyabean oil, and cassava residue (CR) or brewer's grain (BG) as fibrous ingredient sources in the high-fibre diets (HF) and were fed ad libitum. A low-fibre diet (LF), containing around 200 g NDF/kg dry matter (DM), was formulated without CR and BG as feed ingredients. The HF diets (HF-CR and HF-BG) were formulated to contain around 270 g NDF/kg DM. The experiment was arranged as a 2 × 3 factorial completely randomized design with six replications, and lasted 27 days. Increased dietary fibre level resulted in a reduction (P < 0.05) in average daily gain, digestibility of organic matter (OM), CP and gross energy (GE) at the ileum and in the total tract, and in MRT, and an increase (P < 0.05) in the feed conversion ratio and in the weight of the GIT (except for small intestine and caecum). The coefficients of total tract digestibility of fibre fractions were higher in HF diets than in the LF diet, with highest values for diet HF-CR, which had a high proportion of soluble non-starch polysaccharides. MC pigs had longer MRT of digesta than LY pigs (P < 0.05), resulting in higher digestibility at the ileum and in the total tract. Across diets and breeds, the total tract apparent digestibility of OM, CP and GE was positively related (R2 = 0.80 to 0.84) to the MRT of solids, whereas the MRT was negatively related to the DM intake (R2 = 0.60).

Keywords

Mong Cai pigsdigestibilityfibre sourcegastrointestinal tractmean retention time
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 736 - 745
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amino Quant 1990. Amino Quant (Operator's Handbook). HP No. 01090 90025. Hewlett Packard Company, Printed in the Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, USA.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319–338.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE, Hansen, I 1991. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat frations.1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE, Jørgensen, H 2001. Intestinal degradation of dietary carbohydrate – from birth to maturity. In Digestive physiology of pigs (ed. JE Lindberg and B Ogle), pp. 109–120. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Borin, K, Lindberg, JE, Ogle, B 2005. Effect of variety and preservation method of cassava leaves on diet digestibility by indigenous and improved pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 319–324.Google Scholar
Castle, EJ, Castle, ME 1957. Further studies of the rate of passage of food through the alimentary tract of pigs. Journal of Agricultural Science 49, 106–112.Google Scholar
Chinh, BV, Oanh, BT, Ha, NN, Viet, TQ, Khang, DT, Tinh, NT, Binh, LH, Tao, NH 2001. Chemical composition and nutritive value of animal feeds in Vietnam. Agricultural Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam.Google Scholar
Dung, NNX, Manh, LH, Udén, P 2002. Tropical fibre sources for pigs-digestibility, digesta retention and estimation of fibre digestibility in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 102, 109–124.Google Scholar
Freire, JPB, Dias, RIM, Cunha, LF, Aumaitre, A 2003. The effect of genotype and dietary fibre level on the caecal bacterial enzyme activity of young piglets: digestive consequences. Animal Feed Science and Technology 106, 119–130.Google Scholar
Freire, JPB, Guerreiroa, AJG, Cunhaa, LF, Aumaitre, A 2000. Effect of dietary fibre source on total tract digestibility, caecum volatile fatty acids and digestive transit time in the weaned piglet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87, 71–83.Google Scholar
Freire, JPB, Peiniau, J, Cunha, LF, Almeida, JAA, Aumaitre, A 1998. Comparative effects of dietary fat and fibre in Alentejano and Landrace piglets: digestibility, digestive enzymes and metabolic data. Livestock Production Science 53, 37–47.Google Scholar
Glitsø, LV, Brunsgaard, G, Højsgaard, S, Sandström, B, Bach Knudsen, KE 1998. Intestinal degradation in pigs of rye dietary fibre with different structural characteristics. British Journal of Nutrition 80, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guixin, Q, Verstegen, MWA, Bosch, MW 1995. Variarion of digestive between genetically different pig populations: a review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 73, 233–242.Google Scholar
Högberg, A, Lindberg, JE 2004. Influence of cereal non-starch polysaccharides on digestion site and gut environment in growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 87, 121–130.Google Scholar
Högberg, A, Lindberg, JE 2006. The effect of level and type of cereal non-starch polysaccharides on the performance, nutrient utilization and gut environment of pigs around weaning. Animal Feed Science and Technology 127, 200–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, BG, Lindemann, MD, Cromwell, GL, Balfagon, A, Agudelo, JH 2007. The correlation between passage rate of digesta and dry matter digestibility in various stages of swine. Livestock Science 109, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriazakis, I, Emmans, GC 1995. The voluntary feed intake of pigs given feeds based on wheat bran, dried citrus pulp and grass meal, in relation to measurements of feed bulk. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 191–207.Google Scholar
Larsson, K, Bengtsson, S 1983. Bestämning av lätt tillgängliga kolhydrater i växtmaterial (Determination of non-structural carbohydrates in plant material). National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry, Method description no 22, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G, Van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilisation and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 74, 503–515.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Lindberg, JE, Ogle, B 2007. Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai × Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace × Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91, 297–303.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Hong, TTT, Lindberg, JE, Ogle, B 2009a. Comparison of total tract digestibility, development of visceral organs and digestive tract of Mong Cai and Yorkshire × Landrace piglets fed diets with different fibre sources. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 93, 181–191.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Ngoc, TB, Ogle, B, Lindberg, JE 2009b. Ileal and total tract digestibility in local (Mong Cai) and exotic (Landrace × Yorkshire) piglets fed low and high fibre diets, with or without enzyme supplementation. Livestock Science 126, 73–79.Google Scholar
Minitab 2000. Statistical software version 13.31. User's guide to statistics. Minitab, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Morales, J, Perez, JF, Martin-Orue, SM, Fondevila, M, Gasa, J 2002. Large bowel fermentation of maize or sorghum-acorn diets fed as a different source of carbohydrates to Landrace and Iberian pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 88, 489–498.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine, 10th edition. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Ngoc, TTB, Len, NT, Lindberg, JE 2012. Chemical characterization and water holding capacity of fibre-rich feedstuffs used for pigs in Vietnam. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25, 861–868.Google Scholar
Sauer, WC, Fan, MZ, Mosenthin, R, Drochner, W 2000. Method for measuring ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs. In Farm animal metabolism and nutrition (ed. JPF D'Mello), pp. 279–306. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Serena, A, Jørgensen, H, Bach Knudsen, KE 2008. Digestion of carbohydrates and utilization of energy in sows fed diets with contrasting levels and physicochemical properties of dietary fibre. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2208–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanogias, G, Pearce, GR 1985. The digestion of fibre by pigs: 1. The effects of amount and type of fibre on apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance and rate of passage. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theander, O, Aman, P, Westerlund, E, Andersson, R, Pettersson, D 1995. Total dietary fibre determined as neutral sugar residues, uronic acid residues, and Klason lignin (The Uppsala Method): collaborative study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 78, 1030–1044.Google Scholar
Thielemans, MR, Francois, E, Bodart, C, Thewis, A 1978. Mesure du transit gastrointestinal chez le porc à l'aide des radiolanthanides. Comparison avec le mouton. Annales of Biological Animal Biochemistry and Biophysics 18, 237–247.Google Scholar
Udén, P, Sutton, JD 1994. Retention of Cr-labelled grass hay and silage in different segments of the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 37, 297–309.Google Scholar
Udén, P, Colucci, PE, Van Soest, PJ 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Wilfart, A, Montagne, L, Simmins, H, Noblet, J, van Milgen, J 2007. Effect of fibre content in the diet on the mean retention time in different segments of the digestive tract in growing pigs. Livestock Science 109, 27–29.Google Scholar