Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:29:30.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying risk factors for poor hind limb cleanliness in Danish loose-housed dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

B. H. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
P. T. Thomsen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
J. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Foulum, Blichers Allé 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify possible risk factors for poor cow hind limb cleanliness in Danish loose-housed, lactating dairy cows. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional study of 1315 cows in 42 commercial Danish dairy herds with primarily Danish Holstein cows. The effect of four cow-level factors (parity, days in milk, daily lying time and lameness) and eight herd-level factors (herd size, milk production, milking system, floor type, access to pasture grazing, floor scraping frequency, hoof bathing frequency and hoof washing frequency) on the risk of having dirtier hind limbs were analysed using ordinal logistic regression fitting a proportional odds model. Cow hind limb cleanliness was scored using an ordinal score from 1 to 4: 1 being clean and 4 being covered in dirt. The odds ratios (ORs) estimated from the proportional odds model depict the effect of a risk factor on the odds of having a higher rather than a lower cleanliness score. First parity cows had an increased risk of being dirtier compared with third parity or older cows (OR = 1.70). Compared with late lactation, early and mid lactation were associated with an increased risk of being dirtier (OR = 2.07 and 1.33, respectively). Decreasing the daily time lying by 30 min was associated with an increased risk of being dirtier (OR = 1.05). Furthermore, an increased risk of being dirtier was found in herds with no pasture access (OR = 3.75).

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azizi, O, Kaufmann, O, Hasselmann, L 2009. Relationship between feeding behaviour and feed intake of dairy cows depending on their parity and milk yield. Livestock Science 122, 156161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, C, Pettersson, B 1992. The cleanliness of cows tied in stalls and the health of their hooves as influenced by the use of electric trainers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 13, 229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, JM, Boyce, RE, Hockin, J, Munksgaard, L, Eicher, SD, Einstein, ME, Schutz, MM 2010. Influence of milk yield, stage of lactation, and body condition on dairy cattle lying behaviour measured using an automated activity monitoring sensor. Journal of Dairy Research 77, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, JE, Green, MJ, Bradley, AJ 2009. Quarter and cow risk factors associated with the occurrence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 25512561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, NB, Mentink, RL, Bennett, TB, Burgi, K 2007. The effect of heat stress and lameness on time budgets of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 16741682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, G, Lissemore, KD, Guard, CL, Leslie, KE, Kelton, DF 2009. Herd-level risk factors for seven different foot lesions in Ontario Holstein cattle housed in tie stalls or free stalls. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 14041411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohoo, I, Martin, W, Stryhn, H 2003. Model building strategies. In Veterinary epidemiological research (ed. SM McPike), pp. 317334. AVC Inc., Charlottetown, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, KA, Innocent, GT, Mihm, M, Cripps, P, Mclean, WG, Howard, CV, Grove-White, D 2007. Dairy cow cleanliness and milk quality on organic and conventional farms in the UK. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 302310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fregonesi, JA, Leaver, JD 2001. Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 68, 205216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fregonesi, JA, Tucker, CB, Weary, DM 2007. Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 33493354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N, Craggs, L, Hobson, N, Krogh, C 2006. Softening of cattle hoof soles and swelling of heel horn by environmental agents. Food and Chemical Toxicology 44, 12231227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultgren, J, Bergsten, C 2001. Effects of a rubber-slatted flooring system on cleanliness and foot health in tied dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52, 7589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristensen, E, Dueholm, L, Vink, D, Andersen, JE, Jakobsen, EB, Illum-Nielsen, S, Petersen, FA, Enevoldsen, C 2006. Within- and across-person uniformity of body condition scoring in Danish Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 37213728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munksgaard, L, Reenen, C, Boyce, R 2006. Automatic monitoring of lying, standing and walking behaviour in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science Suppl. 89, 304.Google Scholar
Nielsen, LR, Pedersen, AR, Herskin, MS, Munksgaard, L 2010. Quantifying walking and standing behaviour of dairy cows using a moving average based on output from an accelerometer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norring, M, Manninen, E, de Passillé, AM, Rushen, J, Munksgaard, L, Saloniemi, H 2008. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 570576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmos, G, Boyle, L, Hanlon, A, Patton, J, Murphy, JJ, Mee, JF 2009. Hoof disorders, locomotion ability and lying times of cubicle-housed compared to pasture-based dairy cows. Livestock Science 125, 199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rioja-Lang, FC, Roberts, DJ, Healy, SD, Lawrence, AB, Haskell, MJ 2009. Dairy cows trade-off feed quality with proximity to a dominant individual in Y-maze choice tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, 159164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiner, DA, Ruegg, PL 2002. Effects of tail docking on milk quality and cow cleanliness. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 25032511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreiner, DA, Ruegg, PL 2003. Relationship between udder and leg hygiene scores and subclinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 34603465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somers, JGCJ, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Metz, JHM 2005. Risk factors for interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion in dairy cows kept in cubicle houses in The Netherlands. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 71, 2334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Munksgaard, L, Tøgersen, FA 2008. Evaluation of a lameness scoring system for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 119126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolkamp, BJ, Haskell, MJ, Langford, FM, Roberts, DJ, Morgan, CA 2010. Are cows more likely to lie down the longer they stand? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, CB, Weary, DM, Fraser, D 2005. Influence of neck–rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 27302737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Amstel, SR, Shearer, JK, Palin, FL 2004. Moisture content, thickness, and lesions of sole horn associated with thin soles in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 757763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, SJ, Garber, LP, Wagner, BA 1999. Papillomatous digital dermatitis and associated risk factors in US dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 38, 1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeger, SL, Liang, K-Y 1986. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 42, 121130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed