Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T11:14:03.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High- and low-purity glycerine supplementation to dairy cows in early lactation: effects on silage intake, milk production and metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2013

A. Werner Omazic*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23, Uppsala, Sweden
M. Tråvén
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
J. Bertilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23, Uppsala, Sweden
K. Holtenius
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23, Uppsala, Sweden
*
Get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of supplemental low- and high-purity glycerine on silage intake, milk yield and composition, plasma metabolites and body condition score (BCS) in dairy cows. A total of 42 cows of the Swedish Red Breed, housed in individual tie stalls, were fed 0.25 kg of low- or high-purity glycerine on top of concentrate, twice daily, during the first 4 weeks of lactation. One-third of the cows acted as controls, receiving no glycerine. Silage was fed for ad libitum intake and concentrate was fed at restricted level of intake, about 6 kg/day for primiparous cows and 7 kg/day for multiparous cows. Feed refusals were weighed daily. Cows were milked twice daily, milk yield was recorded on four occasions per week and milk samples were collected simultaneously. Blood samples were drawn from the coccygeal vessel once a week. Low- and high-purity glycerine had no effect on silage or total dry matter intake (P = 0.38 and P = 0.75, respectively) or on BCS (P = 0.45). Cows fed high-purity glycerine tended to have higher milk yield than control cows (P = 0.06). Milk composition tended to differ among treatments. No main effects of treatment on concentration of glycerine (P = 0.44), glucose (P = 0.78), insulin (P = 0.33), non-esterified fatty acids (P = 0.33) and β-hydroxybutyrate (P = 0.15) in plasma. These data indicate that high-purity glycerine has the potential to increase milk yield, as well as enhance the milk protein concentration and milk fat + protein yield.

Type
Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. Official Journal of the European Communities L 54, 1130.Google Scholar
Bertilsson, J, Murphy, M 2003. Effects of feeding clover silages on feed intake, milk production and digestion in dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 58, 309322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodarski, R, Wertelecki, T, Bommer, F, Gosiewski, S 2005. The changes of metabolic status and lactation performance in dairy cows under feeding TMR with glycerin (glycerol) supplement at periparturient period. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Animal Husbandary 8, 2230.Google Scholar
Carvalho, ER, Schmelz, NS, White, H, Donkin, SS 2010. Glycerol can replace corn grain in diets for transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 908916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrain, JM, Hippen, AR, Kalscheur, KF, Jardon, PW 2004. Feeding glycerol to transition dairy cows: effects on blood metabolites and lactation performance. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 41954206.Google Scholar
Donkin, SS, Koser, SL, White, HM, Doane, PH, Cecava, MJ 2009. Feeding value of glycerol as a replacement for corn grain in rations fed to lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 51115119.Google Scholar
Duffield, TF, Lissemore, KD, McBride, BW, Leslie, KE 2009. Impact of hyperketonemia in early lactation dairy cows on health and production. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 571580.Google Scholar
Fisher, LJ, Erfle, JD, Sauer, FD 1971. Preliminary evaluation of addition of glucogenic materials to rations of lactating cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 51, 721727.Google Scholar
Gillund, P, Reksen, O, Karlberg, K, Randby, ÅT, Engeland, I, Lutnæs, B 1999. Utprøvning av en holdvurderingsmetode på NRF-kyr. Norsk Veteriærtidskrift 111, 623-632. In Norwegian.Google Scholar
Goff, JP, Horst, RL 2001. Oral glycerol as an aid in the treatment of ketosis/fatty liver complex. Journal of Dairy Science 84 (Suppl. 1), 153.Google Scholar
Herdt, TH 2000. Variability characteristics and test selection in herd-level nutritional and metabolic profile testing. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice 16, 387403.Google Scholar
Ingvartsen, KL 2006. Feeding- and management-related diseases in the transition cow: physiological adaptations around calving and strategies to reduce feeding-related diseases. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 175213.Google Scholar
Khalili, H, Varvikko, T, Toivonen, V, Hissa, K, Suvitie, M 1997. The effects of added glycerol or unprotected free fatty acids or a combination of the two on silage intake, milk production, rumen fermentation and diet digestibility in cows given grass silage based diets. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 6, 349362.Google Scholar
Leng, RA 1970. Glucose synthesis in ruminants. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 14, 209260.Google Scholar
Mach, N, Bach, A, Devant, M 2009. Effects of crude glycerin supplementation on performance and meat quality of Holstein bulls fed high-concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 87, 632638.Google Scholar
Neumann, L, Weigand, E, Most, E 1999. Effect of methanol on methanogenesis and fermentation in the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 82, 142149.Google Scholar
Overton, TR, Waldron, MR 2004. Nutritional management of transition dairy cows: strategies to optimize metabolic health. Journal of Dairy Science 87 (E. Suppl.), E105E119.Google Scholar
Pol, A, Demeyer, D 1988. Fermentation of methanol in the sheep rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54, 832834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schröder, A, Südekum, KH 1999. Glycerol as a by-product of biodiesel production in diets for ruminants. In New horizons for an old crop. Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia. Paper No 241.Google Scholar
Südekum, KH 2008. Co-products from biodiesel production. In Recent advances in animal nutrition—2007 (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman) Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK, pp. 201219.Google Scholar
Thompson, JC, He, BB 2006. Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 22, 261265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C, Liu, Q, Yang, WZ, Huo, WJ, Dong, KH, Huang, YX, Yang, XM, He, DC 2009. Effects of glycerol on lactation performance, energy balance and metabolites in early lactation Holstein dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 151, 1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar