Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:05:12.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of xylanase and antibiotic supplementations on the nutritional utilisation of a wheat diet in growing chicks from genetic D+ and D− lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

V. García ,
J. Gomez ,
S. Mignon-Grasteau ,
N. Sellier  and
B. Carré
V. García*
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France
J. Gomez
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France
S. Mignon-Grasteau
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France
N. Sellier
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The experiment consisted of a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design testing the two D+ and D− chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency (fifth selection generation), xylanase (with or without) and ampicillin and collistin (with or without) supplementations. From 8 to 22 days, 144 chickens (18 birds per treatment) were fed a diet containing 55% wheat from a high-viscosity cultivar (Rialto). Effects of treatments were evaluated on individual growth performance (8 to 19 days), digestibilities of lipids and dry matter, dietary energy value (apparent metabolisable energy corrected to zero-nitrogen retention (AMEn)), digestive organ and breast sizes, and intestinal bile acids at 3 weeks of age. Individual variabilities were much lower in D+ than in D− birds for feed : gain ratios, digestibilities and AMEn values. In all cases, feed : gain ratios were lower in the D+ than in the D− line (P < 0.001), and D+ birds showed 22% to 86% higher values than in D− birds (P < 0.001) for digestibilities and AMEn. In D− birds, antibiotics but not xylanase supplementation had significant effects on lipid digestibility (P < 0.01) and AMEn (P < 0.05), whereas both supplements improved these parameters in D+ birds (P < 0.001 for both additives on lipids digestibility, P < 0.05 for xylanase and P < 0.01 for antibiotics on AMEn). Relative weights of gizzard and proventriculus, and gizzard : intestine weight ratio were higher in D+ than in D− birds, while relative weight of intestine was increased in D− birds compared with D+ birds. Antibiotics reduced intestine relative weight in D+ (P < 0.001) and D− (P < 0.01) lines. AMEn variations were efficiently predicted by the gizzard : intestine weight ratio. In conclusion, antibiotics were very efficient for improving growth performance, AMEn and digestibility values in both chicken lines. Xylanase was less efficient than antibiotics. Because of their low individual variabilities, D+ birds were much more efficient than D− ones for the detection of significant effects induced by xylanase supplementation. Differences between lines in feed : gain ratio, digestibilities and AMEn were reduced when xylanase and antibiotics were added together. Effects of xylanase supplementation and animal genetics on lipid digestibility could not be entirely explained in terms of intestinal bile acids. Other factors should be involved, especially for the lipid digestibility difference induced by animal genetics. The gizzard : intestine weight ratio was an efficient parameter for predicting AMEn variations due to animal genetics and additives.

Keywords

antibioticschickensdigestionenzyme preparationsgenetics
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 1 , Issue 10 , November 2007 , pp. 1435 - 1442
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almirall, M, Francesch, M, Pérez-Vendrell, AM, Brufau, J, Esteve-Garcia, E 1995. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. Journal of Nutrition 125, 947–955.Google ScholarPubMed
Annison, G, Johnson, RJ 1989. Relationship between AME, starch digestibility and pentosan levels in rice, sorghum and wheat diets for broiler chickens. In Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, pp. 79–82. University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Antoniou, TC, Marquardt, RR 1982. Utilization of rye diets by chicks as affected by lipid type and level and penicillin supplementation. Poultry Science 61, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, MR, Classen, HL 1992. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is affected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved rates and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. Journal of Nutrition 122, 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenes, A, Smith, M, Guenter, W, Marquardt, RR 1993. Effect of enzyme supplementation on the performance and digestive tract size of broiler chickens fed wheat and barley-based diets. Poultry Science 72, 1731–1739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carré, B, Idi, A, Maisonnier, S, Melcion, JP, Oury, FX, Gomez, J, Pluchard, P 2002. Relationships between digestibilities of feed components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum aestivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler chicken diet. British Poultry Science 43, 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carré, B, Muley, N, Gomez, J, Oury, F-X, Laffitte, E, Guillou, D, Signoret, C 2005. Soft wheat instead of hard wheat in pelleted diets results in high starch digestibility in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 46, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choct, M, Hughes, RJ, Trimble, RP, Angkanaporn, K, Annison, G 1995. Nonstarch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes increase the performance of broiler chickens fed wheat and low apparent metabolisable energy. Journal of Nutrition 125, 485–492.Google Scholar
Choct, M, Hughes, RJ, Wang, J, Bedford, MR, Morgan, AJ, Annison, G 1996. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for anti-nutritive activity of nonstarch polysaccharides in chickens. British Poultry Science 37, 609–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fengler, AI, Pawlik, JR, Marquardt, RR 1988. Improvement in nutrient retention and changes in excreta viscosities in chicks fed rye-containing diets supplemented with fungal enzymes, sodium taurocholate and penicillin. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 68, 4383–4491.Google Scholar
Fuller, R, Cole, CB, Coates, ME 1983. The effect of dietary penicillin on the growth of gnotobiotic chickens monoassociated with Streptococcus faecium. British Poultry Science 24, 111–114.Google Scholar
Maisonnier, S, Gomez, J, Carré, B 2001. Nutrient digestibility and intestinal viscosities in broiler chickens fed on wheat-based diets, as compared to guar gum added maize diets. British Poultry Science 42, 102–110.Google Scholar
Maisonnier, S, Gomez, J, Brée, A, Berri, C, Baéza, E, Carré, B 2003. Effects of microflora status, dietary bile salts and guar gum on lipid digestibility, intestinal bile salts and histo-morphology, in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 82, 805–814.Google Scholar
Marquardt RR 1997. Enzyme enhancement of the nutritional value of cereals: role of viscous water-soluble nonstarch polysaccharides in chick performance. In Enzymes in poultry and swine nutrition (ed. RR Marquardt and Z Han), pp. 5–19. Nanjing, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
Mignon-Grasteau, S, Muley, N, Bastianelli, D, Gomez, J, Péron, A, Sellier, N, Millet, N, Besnard, J, Hallouis, JM, Carré, B 2004. Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed on a wheat diet. Poultry Science 83, 860–867.Google Scholar
Smits, CHM, Veldman, A, Verkade, HJ, Beynen, AC 1998. The inhibitory effect of carboxymethylcellulose with high viscosity on lipid absorption in broiler chickens coincides with reduced bile salt concentration and raised microbial numbers in the small intestine. Poultry Science 77, 1534–1539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1998. StatView 5.0 software. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Steenfeldt, S 2001. The dietary effect of different wheat cultivars for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 42, 595–609.Google Scholar
Taylor, RD, Jones, GPD 2001. The effect of whole wheat, ground wheat and dietary enzymes on performance and gastro-intestinal morphology of broilers. Proceedings of Australian Poultry Science Symposium, pp. 13, 187–190.Google Scholar
Visek, WJ 1978. The mode of growth promotion by antibiotics. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1447–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vukic Vranjes, M, Wenk, C 1995. Influence of dietary enzyme complex on the performance of broilers fed on diets with or without antibiotic supplementation. British Poultry Science 36, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, YB, Thomas, DG, Ravindran, V, Birtles, MJ, Hendriks, WH 2004. Influence of phytase and xylanase, individually or in combination, on the performance, apparent metabolisable energy, digesta viscosity, digestive tract measurements and gut morphology in broilers fed wheat-based diets containing adequate level of phosphorus. British Poultry Science 45, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, B, Hsu, JC, Chiou, PWS 1997. Effects of β-glucanase supplementation of barley diets in growth performance of broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar