Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:59:15.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of organic diets on the performance of pullets maintained under semi-organic conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

T. Acamovic ,
V. Sandilands ,
I. Kyriazakis  and
N. Sparks
T. Acamovic
Affiliation:
Animal Health Group, SAC, Kings Buildings, West Main Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
V. Sandilands
Affiliation:
Animal Health Group, SAC, Kings Buildings, West Main Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
I. Kyriazakis
Affiliation:
Animal Health Group, SAC, Kings Buildings, West Main Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
N. Sparks*
Affiliation:
Animal Health Group, SAC, Kings Buildings, West Main Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of organic diets, with or without supplements of betaine, saponin, fructo-oligosaccharide and methionine, on the health, performance and gut flora of pullets were investigated. A comparison was also made between birds fed organic diets and those fed a non-organic diet. Day-old Lohmann Tradition pullets were reared in 24 groups of 64 chicks indoors until 11 weeks, and then in 48 groups of 24 to 27 chicks with access to range until 17 weeks of age. Groups of birds were fed one of eight diets, a conventional rearing diet with supplementary amino acids, an organic basal diet, organic basal plus methionine and organic basal supplemented with one of the test ingredients. At most stages of growth the birds fed the conventional diet and those fed the basal diet with methionine performed better than those that had no supplemental methionine. Other dietary treatments had no consistently significant effect on growth, the microbial populations within the gastro-intestinal tract of the birds or the number of parasite eggs excreted. After 5 weeks with access to range, the birds that were fed three out of five diets regarded as deficient in sulphur amino acids achieved similar weights (P > 0.05) to birds that received diets adequate in sulphur amino acids. Health and welfare of birds fed organic diets was not adversely affected; however, an investigation of birds housed in larger flocks and taken into the laying phase, when physical demands on birds are greatest, is required.

Keywords

methioninenutritionorganic dietspullets
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 117 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acamovic, T, Brooker, JD 2005. Biochemistry of plant secondary metabolites and their effects in animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 64, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acamovic T, Chandresekeran D, Natarajan A, Anitha K and Sparks NHC 2004. Effects on production traits of feeding tanniferous-rich sorghum to Desi poultry. Proceedings of the XXII World’s Poultry Congress, Istanbul, p. 895.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005. Lohmann tradition management guide. Lohmann GB Ltd, Andover, UK.Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, S, Kyriazakis, I 2004. Plant secondary metabolites: antiparasitic effects and their role in ruminant production systems. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63, 631–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avato, P, Bucci, R, Tava, A, Vitali, C, Rosato, A, Bialy, Z, Jurzysta, M 2006. Antimicrobial activity of saponins from Medicago sp.: structure-activity relationship. Phytotherapy Research 20, 454–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedford, M 2000. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: implications and strategies to minimise subsequent problems. World’s Poultry Science Journal 56, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, M, Jackson, F 1982. Specific identification of strongyle eggs in small samples of sheep feces. Research in Veterinary Science 32, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, DE, Acamovic, T, McDevitt, RM 2004. Effect of the inclusion of Thymus vulgaris L. oil in diets with and without enzymes, on nutrient digestibility in broilers. British Poultry Science 45, S22–S23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahiya, JP, Hoehler, D, Wilkie, DC, Van Kessel, AG, Drew, MD 2005. Dietary glycine concentration affects intestinal Clostridium perfringens and Lactobacilli populations in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 84, 1875–1885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DEFRA 2007. Guidance for the application of the derogation to use non-organic feed for organic livestock (with list amended January 2007). Retrieved from http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/organic/standards/pdf/confeed-indguide.pdfGoogle Scholar
Friedman, A, Bar-Shira, E, Sklan, D 2003. Ontogeny of gut associated immune competence in the chick. World’s Poultry Science Journal 59, 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert C, Särkilahti L, Apajalahti J, Acamovic T and Bedford M 2000. Microbial populations in caecal contents from chicks fed lupin-based diets with and without enzyme supplementation. Proceedings of the XXI World’s Poultry Congress, Montreal, no. W2.04.Google Scholar
Hegelund, L, Sørensen, JT, Kjær, J, Kristensen, IS 2005. Use of the range area in commercial egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover. British Poultry Science 46, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hristov, AN, Ivan, M, Neill, L, McAllister, TA 2003. Evaluation of several potential bioactive agents for reducing protozoal activity in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 105, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D, Campbell, JI, King, TP, Grant, G, Jansson, EA, Coutts, AGP, Pettersson, S, Conway, S 2004. Commensal anaerobic bacteria attenuate inflammation by regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of PPAR and RelA. Nature Immunology 5, 104–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kettunen, H, Tiihonen, K, Peuranen, S, Saarinen, MT, Remus, JC 2001. Dietary betaine accumulates in the liver and intestinal tissue and stabilizes the intestinal epithelial structure in healthy and coccidia-infected broiler chicks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular and Integrative Physiology 130, 759–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, MT 2004. Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers. Poultry Science 83, 650–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, MT, Ferket, PR, Garlich, JD 1997. Nutritional and osmoregulatory functions of betaine. World’s Poultry Science Journal 53, 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjaer, JB, Sørensen, P 2002. Feather pecking and cannibalism in free-range laying hens as affected by genotype, dietary level of methionine and cystine, light intensity during rearing and age at first access to the range area. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76, 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klasing, KC 2006. Micronutrient supply: influence on gut health and immunity. In Avian gut function in health and disease (ed. GC Perry), Poultry Science Symposium Series, vol. 28. pp. 210–223. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDevitt, RM, Mack, S, Wallis, I 2000. Can betaine partially replace or enhance the effect of methionine by improving broiler growth and carcass characteristics? British Poultry Science 41, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neto, MG, Pesti, GM, Bakalli, RI 2000. Influence of dietary protein level on the broiler chicken’s response to methionine and betaine supplements. Poultry Science 79, 1478–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbold, CJ, El Hassan, SM, Wang, J, Ortega, ME, Wallace, RJ 1997. Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennycott, TW, Steel, F 2001. Parasitic worms in commercial free-range poultry flocks in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 149, 428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberfroid, MB 2005. Introducing inulin-type fructans. British Journal of Nutrition 93, S13–S25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, SP, Craig, L, Pritchard, S 2004. A comparison of organic laying hen feed formulations. British Poultry Science 45, S63–S64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, CJ 1989. The importance of invertebrate food to chicks of gallinaceous species. Proceeding of the Nutrition Society 48, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, CJ, Mann, JS 1999. Feather pecking in groups of growing bantams in relation to floor litter substrate and plumage colour. British Poultry Science 40, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanmugavelu, S, Ruzickova, G, Zrustova, J, Brooker, JD 2006. A fermentation assay to evaluate the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents on gut microflora. Journal of Microbiological Methods 67, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sklan, D, Noy, Y 2003. Crude protein and essential amino acid requirements in chicks during the first week posthatch. British Poultry Science 44, 266–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sliwinski, BJ, Kreuzer, M, Sutter, F, Machmuller, A, Wettstein, HR 2004. Performance, body nitrogen conversion and nitrogen emission from manure of dairy cows fed diets supplemented with different plant extracts. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 13, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Krimpen, MM, Kwakkel, RP, Reuvekamp, BFJ, Van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, Den Hartog, LA, Verstegen, MWA 2005. Impact of feeding management on feather pecking in laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal 61, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen E and Rosi L 1995. Effects of betaine on methionine requirements of broilers under various environmental conditions. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, pp. 88–92.Google Scholar
VSN International 2004. Genstat version 7. VSNI Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Wahlström, A, Tauson, R, Elwinger, K 1998. Effects on plumage condition, health and mortality of dietary oats/wheat ratios to three hybrids of laying hens in different housing systems. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 48, 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, RJ 2004. Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63, 621–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, CC 2002. Nutrition and poultry welfare. Poultry Science 58, 349–356.Google Scholar
Wina, E, Muetzel, S, Becker, K 2005. The impact of saponins or saponins-containing plant materials on ruminant production – a review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, 8093–8105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed