Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:21:09.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drying and warming immediately after birth may reduce piglet mortality in loose-housed sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

I. L. Andersen ,
I. A. Haukvik  and
K. E. Bøe
I. L. Andersen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
I. A. Haukvik
Affiliation:
Norwegian Pig Health Service, 3812 Akkerhaugen, Norway
K. E. Bøe
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present experiment was to investigate the effects of placing newborn piglets under the heat lamp or both drying and placing them under the heat lamp on piglet mortality. Sixty-seven healthy (Landrace × Yorkshire) sows were divided equally into three different experimental groups: a control group where the farrowings occurred without supervision from the farmer (C; n = 23 litters), another group where the piglets were placed under the heat lamp in the creep area immediately after birth (HL; n = 22 litters) and a third group where the piglets were dried with straw and paper towels followed by placing them under the heat lamp in the creep area immediately after birth (DHL; n = 22 litters). The sows were individually loose-housed in farrowing pens during farrowing and lactation. The piglets were not closed inside the creep area, but were free to move around in the pen. The routines in the experimental groups required the stock person to attend the farrowings from the onset of birth of the first piglet until the last piglet was born. All the dead piglets were weighed and subjected to a post mortem examination at the farm to ascertain the causes of death. Postnatal mortality (% of live born) was significantly lower in the HL and DHL groups than in the control group (P < 0.0001). This was significant concerning all causes of mortality. Compared to the control group, crushing occurred in significantly fewer litters when the piglets were both dried and placed under the heat lamp (P < 0.05). In the DHL treatment, crushing of one or more piglets by the sow occurred in only 13.6% of the litters, whereas this was increased to 34.8% in the HL and to 47.9% in the control group, respectively. All causes of death, except the proportion of stillborn piglets, increased significantly with increasing litter size. Because of the relatively large potential that these rather simple routines may have to improve piglet survival, different types of management or human interference around the time of farrowing should be compared on a larger scale, both experimentally and on commercial farms.

Keywords

dryingheat lampmanagementpiglet mortalitywarming
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , April 2009 , pp. 592 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, IL, Berg, S, Bøe, KE 2005. Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa) – purely accidental or a poor mother? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, IL, Melbø, G, Haukvik, IA, Kongsrud, S 2007. Relationship between postnatal piglet mortality, environmental factors and management around farrowing in herds with loose-housed, lactating sows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 57, 38–45.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, JK, Blackshaw, AW, Thomas, FJ, Newman, FW 1994. Comparison of behavioural patterns of sows and litters in a farrowing crate and a farrowing pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christison, GI, Wenger, II, Follensbee, ME 1997. Teat seeking success of newborn piglets after dying or warming. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G, Smith, JA 1992. Effects of accommodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behaviour of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, GM, Lefébure, B, McClintock, S 2000. A comparison of piglet production and survival in the Werribee farrowing Pen and conventional farrowing crates at a commercial farm. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, GW, Swierstra, EE 1987. Causes of piglet death from birth to weaning. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67, 543–547.Google Scholar
English, PR 1993. Factors affecting neonatal piglet losses and management practices to minimize such losses. The Veterinary Annual 33, 107–119.Google Scholar
English, PR, Morrison, V 1984. Causes and prevention of piglet mortality. Pig News and Information 5, 369–376.Google Scholar
English, PR, Wilkinson, V 1982. Management of the sow and litter in late pregnancy and lactation in relation to piglet survival and growth. InControl of pig reproduction (ed. DJA Cole and GR Foxcroft), pp. 479–506. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyake, PK, Dial, GD, Trigg, T, King, VL 1995. Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3543–3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, JN, Rudd, AR, Mendl, MT, Broom, DM, Meredith, MJ, Corning, S, Simms, PH 2000. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. The Veterinary Records 147, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, LJ, Jørgensen, E, Heiskanen, T, Damm, BI 2006. Early piglet mortality in loose-housed sows related to sow and piglet behaviour and to the progress of parturition. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, AD, Weary, DM, Fraser, D, Pajor, EA, Kramer, DL 2002. Alternative housing for sows and litters, Part 5. Individual differences in the maternal behaviour of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, JA, Bland, IM 2002. The acquisition of passive immunity in the new-born piglet. Livestock Production Science 78, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H 1992. Abferkelbuchten: ein neues Konzept. Entwicklung und Anwendung. FAT-Berichte nr. 417, 1–8.Google Scholar
Svendsen, J, Bengtsson, ACH, Svendsen, LS 1986. Occurrence and causes of traumatic injuries in neonatal pigs. Pig News and Information 7, 159–170.Google Scholar
Thingnes, SL, Andersen, IL, Torsethaugen, Kand Pedersen, LJ 2008. Nursing quality in sows and piglet mortality – preliminary results on the effects of a high and low breeding value for survival rate and two different farrowing environments. Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Symposium of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 16–18 January, Oscarsborg, Norway.Google Scholar
Tuchscherer, M, Puppe, B, Tuchscherer, A, Tiemann, U 2000. Early identification of neonates at risk: traits of newborn piglets with respect to survival. Theriogenology 54, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weary, DM, Pajor, EA, Thompson, K, Fraser, D 1996. Risky behaviour by piglets: a trade off between feeding and risk of mortality by maternal crushing? Animal Behaviour 51, 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R, Schick, M 1996. Neue Abferkelbuchten ohne Fixation der Muttersau. Wenig höhere Investitionen, praxisüblicher Arbeitszeitbedarf. FAT-Berichte nr. 481, 1–4.Google Scholar
Wechsler, B, Hegglin, D 1997. Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, KR, Anderson, DM, Bate, LA 1996. Increasing piglet survival through an improved farrowing management protocol. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76, 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar