Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:27:27.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct and carryover effect of post-grazing sward height on total lactation dairy cow performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

E. Ganche ,
L. Delaby ,
M. O'Donovan ,
T. M. Boland  and
E. Kennedy
E. Ganche
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
L. Delaby
Affiliation:
INRA, AgroCampus Ouest, UMR 1348, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France
M. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
T. M. Boland
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
E. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Grazing pastures to low post-grazing sward heights (PGSH) is a strategy to maximise the quantity of grazed grass in the diet of dairy cows within temperate grass-based systems. Within Irish spring-calving systems, it was hypothesised that grazing swards to very low PGSH would increase herbage availability during early lactation but would reduce dairy cow performance, the effect of which would persist in subsequent lactation performance when compared with cows grazing to a higher PGSH. Seventy-two Holstein–Friesian dairy cows (mean calving date, 12 February) were randomly assigned post-calving across two PGSH treatments (n = 36): 2.7 cm (severe; S1) and 3.5 cm (moderate; M1), which were applied from 10 February to 18 April (period 1; P1). This was followed by a carryover period (period 2; P2) during which cows were randomly reassigned within their P1 treatment across two further PGSH (n = 18): 3.5 cm (severe, SS and MS) and 4.5 cm (moderate, SM and MM) until 30 October. Decreasing PGSH from 3.5 to 2.7 cm significantly decreased milk (−2.3 kg/cow per day), protein (−95 g/day), fat (−143 g/day) and lactose (−109 g/day) yields, milk protein (−1.2 g/kg) and fat (−2.2 g/kg) concentrations and grass dry matter intake (GDMI; −1.7 kg dry matter/cow per day). The severe PGSH was associated with a lower bodyweight (BW) at the end of P1. There was no carryover effect of P1 PGSH on subsequent milk or milk solids yields in P2, but PGSH had a significant carryover effect on milk fat and lactose concentrations. Animals severely restricted at pasture in early spring had a higher BW and slightly higher body condition score in later lactation when compared with M1 animals. During P2, increasing PGSH from 3.5 to 4.5 cm increased milk and milk solids yield as a result of greater GDMI and resulted in higher mean BW and end BW. This study indicates that following a 10-week period of feed restriction, subsequent dairy cow cumulative milk production is unaffected. However, the substantial loss in milk solid yield that occurred during the period of restriction is not recovered.

Keywords

post-grazing heightdairy cowearly lactationcarryover
Type
Farming systems and environment
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , August 2013 , pp. 1390 - 1400
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brereton, AJ, Carton, OT, O'Keeffe, WF 1985. Tissue turnover in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) during winter. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 24, 49–62.Google Scholar
Broster, WH, Broster, VJ 1984. Reviews of the progress of dairy science: long term effects of plane of nutrition on the performance of the dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 51, 149–196.Google Scholar
Broster, WH, Sutton, JD, Bines, JA, Broster, VJ, Smith, T, Siviter, JW, Johnson, VW, Napper, DJ, Schuller, E 1985. The influence of plane of nutrition and diet composition on the performance of dairy cows. The Journal of Agricultural Science 104, 535–557.Google Scholar
Coulon, JB, Rémond, B 1991. Variations in milk output and milk protein content in response to the level of energy supply to the dairy cow: a review. Livestock Production Science 29, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaby, L, Peyraud, JL 1998. Effect of a simultaneous reduction of nitrogen fertilization and stocking rate on grazing dairy cow performances and pasture utilization. Annales de Zootechnie 47, 17–39.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Peyraud, JL, Delagarde, R 2001. Effect of the level of concentrate supplementation, herbage allowance and milk yield at turn-out on the performance of dairy cows in mid lactation at grazing. Animal Science 73, 171–181.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Foucher, N, Michel, G, Peyraud, JL 2003. The effect of two contrasting grazing managements and level of concentrate supplementation on the performance of grazing dairy cows. Animal Research 52, 437–460.Google Scholar
Delaby, L, Faverdin, P, Michel, G, Disenhaus, C, Peyraud, JL 2009. Effect of different feeding strategies on lactation performance of Holstein and Normande dairy cows. Animal 3, 891–905.Google Scholar
Dillon, P 1993. The use of n-alkanes as markers to determine intake, botanical composition of available or consumed herbage in studies of digesta kinetics with dairy cows. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Stakelum, G 1989. Herbage and dosed alkanes as a grass management technique for dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 104. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 104 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Edwards, GR, Parsons, AJ, Penning, PD, Newman, JA 1995. Relationship between vegetation state and bite dimensions of sheep grazing contrasting plant species and its implications for intake rate and diet selection. Grass and Forage Science 50, 378–388.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Emmans, GC, Kyriazakis, I, Oldham, JD, Lewis, M 1998. Feed intake relative to stage of lactation for dairy cows consuming total mixed diets with a high or low ratio of concentrate to forage. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 2228–2239.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Brun-Lafleur, L, Faverdin, P, Sauvant, D, Martin, O. 2013. Advances in predicting nutrient partitioning in the dairy cow: recognizing the central role of genotype and its expression through time. Animal, 7 (supplement s1), 89–101.Google Scholar
Kay, JK, Phyn, CVC, Rius, AG, Morgan, SR, Grala, TM, Roche, JR 2011. Effect of milking frequency and nutrition in early lactation on milk production and body condition in grazing dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 71, 37–41.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E, O'Donovan, M, Murphy, JP, Delaby, L, O'Mara, F 2005. Effects of grass pasture and concentrate-based feeding systems for spring-calving dairy cows in early spring on performance during lactation. Grass and Forage Science 60, 310–318.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E, O'Donovan, M, Murphy, JP, O'Mara, FP, Delaby, L 2006. The effect of initial spring grazing date and subsequent stocking rate on the grazing management, grass dry matter intake and milk production of dairy cows in summer. Grass and Forage Science 61, 375–384.Google Scholar
Kennedy, E, O'Donovan, M, O'Mara, FP, Murphy, JP, Delaby, L 2007. The effect of early-lactation feeding strategy on the lactation performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3060–3070.Google Scholar
Kennedy, K, Curran, J, Mayes, B, McEvoy, M, Murphy, JP, O'Donovan, M 2011. Restricting dairy cow access time to pasture in early lactation: the effects on milk production, grazing behaviour and dry matter intake. Animal 5, 1805–1813.Google Scholar
Koenen, EPC, Veerkamp, RF, Dobbelaar, P, De Jong, G 2001. Genetic analysis of body condition score of lactating Dutch Holstein and Red-and-White Heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1265–1270.Google Scholar
Lips, M, Rieder, P 2005. Abolition of raw milk quota in the European Union: a CGE analysis at the member country level. Journal of Agricultural Economics 56, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lowman, BG, Scott, NA, Somerville, SH 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin no. 6. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Maher, J, Stakelum, G, Rath, M 2003. Effect of daily herbage allowance on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 42, 229–241.Google Scholar
McEvoy, M, Kennedy, E, Murphy, JP, Boland, TM, Delaby, L, O'Donovan, M 2008. The effect of herbage allowance and concentrate supplementation on milk production performance and dry matter intake of spring-calving dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1258–1269.Google Scholar
Michell, P, Fulkerson, WJ 1987. Effect of grazing intensity in spring on pasture growth, composition and digestibility, and on milk production by dairy cows. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27, 35–40.Google Scholar
Nielsen, NI, Friggens, NC, Larsen, T, Andersen, JB, Nielsen, MO, Ingvartsen, KL 2007. Effect of changes in diet energy density on feed intake, milk yield and metabolic parameters in dairy cows in early lactation. Animal 1, 335–346.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Delagarde, R 2013. Managing variations in dairy cow nutrient supply under grazing. Animal 7 (supplement s1), 57–67.Google Scholar
Roche, JR 2007. Milk production responses to pre- and postcalving dry matter intake in grazing dairy cows. Livestock Science 110, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalloo, L, O'Donnell, S, Horan, B 2007. Profitable dairying in an increased EU milk quota scenario. In Exploiting the freedom to milk. Proceedings of the Teagasc National Dairy Conference 2007 (ed. L Fitzgerald and M Murphy), pp. 20–42. Kilkenny, Ireland.Google Scholar
Stakelum, G, Dillon, P 1991. Influence of sward structure and digestibility on the intake and performance of lactating and growing cattle. In Management Issues for the Grassland farmer in the 1990's (ed CS Mayne), pp. 30–44. Occasional Symposium No. 25. British Grassland Society, Hurley, Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
Stakelum, G, Dillon, P 2007. The effect of grazing pressure on rotationally grazed pastures in spring/early summer on subsequent sward characteristics. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 46, 15–28.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, AM, Chilibroste, P 2011. Challenges in the nutrition and management of herbivores in the temperate zone. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731111001741, Published online by Cambridge University Press 29 September 2011.Google Scholar
Vetharaniam, I, Davis, SR, Upsdell, M, Kolver, ES, Pleasants, AB 2003. Modelling the effect of energy status on mammary gland growth and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3148–3156.Google Scholar
Wales, WJ, Doyle, PT, Stockdale, CR, Dellow, A 1999. Effects of variations in herbage mass, allowance, and level of supplement on nutrient intake and milk production of dairy cows in spring and summer. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 119–130.Google Scholar