Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T21:12:31.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zoomorphism and anthropomorphism: fruitful fallacies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Webster*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Zoo- and anthropomorphism may both be scientific heresies but both may serve as a basis for thought (and real) experiments designed to explore our ability to assess quality of life as perceived by another sentient animal. Sentience, a major contributor to evolutionary fitness in a complex environment, implies ‘feelings that matter’. Strength of motivation is a measure of how much they matter. Since humans and most domestic animals share the property of sentience, it follows that some aspects of feeling may be similar, and where we differ, the differences may be of degree rather than absolute. One of the assumed absolutes that I shall challenge is the concept that non-human animals live only in the present. I explore how domestic animals may experience the feelings of hunger, pain, fear and hope. Hunger is indisputably a primitive sensation. Pain and fear are primitive sensations with emotional overtones. The problem is to discover how they may affect quality of life. Acute pain and fear are positive signals for action to avoid harm. These actions and their consequences (‘how well did I cope?’) will be committed to memory and affect how an animal feels when they recur, or it fears they may recur. Hope (and its antithesis, despair) are considered by many philosophers (who do not own dogs) as emotions restricted to humans since only we can imagine the future. However, by application of zoomorphism we may classify hope with hunger as a primitive feeling of dissatisfaction with the status quo. Either may lead to action directed towards the goal of feeling better or encourage the belief that things will get better (food will arrive). Both are feelings of expectation for the future modulated in the light of past experience. With all these four emotions quality of life may be expressed in terms of how well the animal feels it can cope, both in the present and in the future. When it feels it cannot cope, then it will suffer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Danbury, TC, Weeks, CA, Chambers, JP, Waterman-Pearson, AF and Kestin, SC 1999 Self-selection of the analgesic drug carprofen by lame broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 146: 307311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C 1872 The Expression Of The Emotions In Man And Animals. Filiquarian Publications: USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13: 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Broom, DB 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. CAB Publications: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Iggo, A 1984 Pain In Animals. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, KM 1998 Intelligent perception. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57: 213231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkden, RD and Pajor, EA 2006 Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ feelings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100: 2947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koolhaas, JM, Korte, SM, De Boer, SF, Van Der Vegt, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Hopster, H, De Jong, IC, Ruis, MA and Blokhuis, HJ 1999 Coping styles in animals: current status in behaviour and stress-physiology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 23: 925935CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, JD 2002 The neurobehavioural nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, LU, Braithwaite, V and Gentle, MJ 2003 Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B270: 11151121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 2005 Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 2009 Animal welfare and nutrition. In: Smulders, FJM and Algers, B (eds) Welfare of Production Animals; Assessment and Management Of Risks pp 113132. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF, Saville, C, Church, BM, Gnanasakthy, A and Moss, R 1985 The effect of different rearing systems on the development of calf behaviour. British Veterinary Journal 141: 249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittgenstein, L 1953 Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar