Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T03:30:26.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Your happiness or mine: Influence of affective states and level of contact on public perceptions of elephant tourism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

ME Weston ,
KE Mills  and
MAG von Keyserlingk
ME Weston
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
KE Mills
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
MAG von Keyserlingk*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence: nina@mail.ubc.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Thailand participate in the tourism industry at attractions known as ‘elephant camps.’ There has been significant criticism of low welfare venues, where the elephants may experience injuries, poor nutrition, unnatural social environments and aversive handling. Despite increasing concern for animal welfare, the general public often have difficulty identifying the welfare issues affecting captive animals. The aim of this study was to investigate participants’ willingness to support an elephant attraction and their perceived emotional value from the experience, based on the affective state of the captive elephant and their level of contact with it. Participants (n = 590) from the United States were randomly assigned to one of four vignettes (using a 2 × 2 experimental design) that described an elephant attraction, varying the affective state of the elephant (feels excellent, feels terrible) and the level of contact they could have with the elephant (low, high). A mixed methods approach was used, where participants provided answers to Likert-type questions, followed by an open-ended response. Participants showed greater willingness to support the elephant attraction and greater perceived emotional value from the experience when the elephant felt excellent, as opposed to when the elephant felt terrible. There were no significant differences between low and high contact for the measures included in this study. Qualitative responses varied greatly, with participants making many assumptions about the elephant and the attraction, revealing potential misconceptions that they had regarding the welfare of captive elephants. This research may be used to encourage a shift in tourism preferences to venues that reflect positive elephant welfare.

Keywords

affective statesanimal welfarecontactelephantpublic perceptionwildlife tourism
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 279 - 293
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Altmetric 2019 Overview of attention for ‘goats distinguish between positive and negative emotion-linked vocalisations’. https://www.alt-metric.com/details/63354813Google Scholar
Aronow, PM, Baron, J and Pinson, L 2015 A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2683588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, L and Burton, M 2017 Proximity and animal welfare in the con-text of tourist interactions with habituated dolphins. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25: 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1195835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baciadonna, L, Briefer, EF, Favaro, L and McElligott, AG 2019 Goats distinguish between positive and negative emotion-linked vocalisations. Frontiers in Zoology 16: 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-019-0323-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bansiddhi, P, Brown, J and Thitaram, C 2020a Welfare assess-ment and activities of captive elephants in Thailand. Animals 10: 919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansiddhi, P, Brown, J, Thitaram, C, Punyapornwithaya, V and Nganvongpanit, K 2020b Elephant tourism in Thailand: a review of animal welfare practices and needs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 23: 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2019.1569522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bansiddhi, P, Brown, JL, Thitaram, C, Punyapornwithaya, V, Somgird, C, Edwards, KL and Nganvongpanit, K 2018 Changing trends in elephant camp management in northern Thailand and implications for welfare. PeerJ 6: e5996. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5996CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bansiddhi, P, Nganvongpanit, K, Brown, JL, Punyapornwithaya, V, Pongsopawijit, P and Thitaram, C 2019 Management factors affecting physical health and welfare of tourist camp elephants in Thailand. PeerJ 7: e6756. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6756CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, LA, Poole, JH and Byrne, RW 2008 Elephant cognition. Current Biology 18: 544–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baun, MM, Bergstrom, N, Langston, NF and Thoma, L 1984 Physiological effects of human/companion animal bonding. Nursing Research 33: 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198405000-00002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beetz, A, Uvnäs-Moberg, K, Julius, H and Kotrschal, K 2012 Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belicia, T and Islam, M 2018 Towards a decommodified wildlife tourism: why market environmentalism is not enough for conser-vation. Societies 8: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, S 2017 Should elephant riding be illegal? In: Ord, C (ed) Elephants in Asia, Ethically: Humane Experiences with Asia's Sacred Animal p 69. Horizon Guides: Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, GA, Schore, AN, Brown, JL, Poole, JH and Moss, CJ 2005 Elephant breakdown. Nature 433: 807. https://doi.org/10.1038/433807aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bratman, GN, Hamilton, JP and Daily, GC 2012 The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1249: 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhrmester, M, Kwang, T and Gosling, SD 2011 Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, CC 2011 A vicious cycle: a cross-sectional study of canine tail-chasing and human responses to it, using a free video-sharing website. PLoS One 6: e26553. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burstin, K, Doughtie, EB and Raphaeli, A 1980 Contrastive vignette technique: an indirect methodology designed to address reactive social attitude measurement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10: 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00699.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos-Arceiz, A, Lin, TZ, Htun, W, Takatsuki, S and Leimgruber, P 2008 Working with mahouts to explore the diet of work elephants in Myanmar (Burma). Ecological Research 23: 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0466-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, CS, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Hötzel, MJ, Robbins, J and Weary, DM 2018 Hot and bothered: public attitudes towards heat stress and outdoor access for dairy cows. PLoS One 13: e0205352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205352CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlstead, K, Paris, S and Brown, JL 2019 Good keeper-ele-phant relationships in North American zoos are mutually benefi-cial to welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 211: 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, SM, Yates, JF, Preston, SD and Chen, L 2016 Regulating emotions during difficult multiattribute decision making: the role of pre-decisional coherence shifting. PLoS One 11: e0150873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150873CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, N 2016 An analysis of zoo visitors’ favourite and least favourite animals. Tourism Management Perspectives 20: 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2016.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, MJ, Neville, BA and Whitwell, GJ 2010 Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: towards a framework for under-standing the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 97: 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casler, K, Bickel, L and Hackett, E 2013 Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior 29: 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipkin, H 2015 Review sites guide travelers, especially affluent ones. https://www.travelweekly.com/ConsumerSurvey2015/Making-a-choice-Review-sites-guide-travelers-especially-affluent-onesGoogle Scholar
Clark, FE 2011 Great ape cognition and captive care: can cognitive challenges enhance well-being? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M 2011 From ‘animal machines’ to ‘happy meat?’ Foucault's ideas of disciplinary and pastoral power applied to ‘animal-cen-tred’ welfare discourse. Animals 1: 83–101. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani1010083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connelly, LM 2011 Cronbach's alpha. Medsurg Nursing 20: 44–46Google ScholarPubMed
Coolman, AA, Niedbalski, A, Powell, DM, Kozlowski, CP, Franklin, AD and Deem, SL 2020 Changes in human health parameters associated with an immersive exhibit experience at a zoological institution. PLoS One 15: e0231383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, JAH, Lahdenperä, M, Oo, ZM, Htut, W, Nandar, H and Lummaa, V 2020 Taming age mortality in semi-captive Asian elephants. Scientific Reports 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58590-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, JW and Clark, VLP 2011 Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S 2009 Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological ben-efits of human-wildlife encounters. Current Issues in Tourism 12: 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500903042857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, S 2010 What makes for memorable wildlife encounters? Revelations from ‘serious’ wildlife tourists. Journal of Ecotourism 9: 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040903071969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, G 2007 Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701313595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Lima, IB and Green, RJ 2017 Wildlife tourism management and phenomena: a web of complex conceptual, theoretical and practical issues. In: de Lima, IB and Green, RJ (eds) Wildlife Tourism, Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters pp 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55574-4_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, JM and Stich, S 2007 As a matter of fact: empirical per-spectives on ethics. In: Jackson, F and Smith, M (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy pp. 114–152. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234769.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duer, C, Tomasi, T and Abramson, C 2016 Reproductive endocrinology and musth indicators in a captive Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Psychological Reports 119: 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116667092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, R and Moore, L 2011 Global regulations and local prac-tices: the politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19: 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.566927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I 2005 Science-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 24: 483–492. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.2.1587Google ScholarPubMed
Duncan, IJH 2004 A concept of welfare based on feelings. In: Benson, GJ and Rollin, BE (eds) The Well-Being of Farm Animals: Challenges and Solutions pp 85–102. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470344859.ch5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K, Moore, RJ and Harris, S 2013a The social and ecolog-ical integration of captive-raised adolescent male African elephants (Loxodonta africana) into a wild population. PLoS One 8: e55933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, K, Moore, RJ and Harris, S 2013b The release of a captive-raised female African elephant (Loxodonta africana) in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Animals 3: 370–385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagen, A, Acharya, N and Kaufman, GE 2014 Positive rein-forcement training for a trunk wash in Nepal's working elephants: demonstrating alternatives to traditional elephant training techniques. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 17: 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2014.856258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayant, M-P, Sigall, H, Lemonnier, A, Retsin, E and Alexopoulos, T 2017 On the limitations of manipulation checks: an obstacle toward cumulative science. International Review of Social Psychology 30: 125–130. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkler, W and Higham, J 2004 The human dimensions of whale watching: an analysis based on viewing platforms. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9: 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200490441757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 2008 Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50: S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A sci-entific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, KA, Slagle, KM, Wilson, RS, Moeller, SJ and Bruskotter, JT 2016 Changes in attitudes toward animals in the United States from 1978 to 2014. Biological Conservation 201: 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, A and Kongmuang, C 2009 Distribution, demography and basic husbandry of the Asian elephant in the tourism industry in Northern Thailand. Gajah 30: 13–18Google Scholar
Godinez, AM, Fernandez, EJ and Morrissey, K 2013 Visitor behaviors and perceptions of jaguar activities. Anthrozoös 26: 613–619. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13795775535850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, RL, Hill, A, Mawritz, MB and Quade, MJ 2017 Employee machiavellianism to unethical behavior: the role of abu-sive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Management 43: 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314535434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, D 2011 Are dolphins too smart for captivity? Science 332: 526–529. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.332.6029.526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hacker, CE and Miller, LJ 2016 Zoo visitor perceptions, atti-tudes, and conservation intent after viewing African elephants at the San Diego Zoo Safari Park. Zoo Biology 35: 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, LA 1994 The Asian elephants-driver partnership: the driv-ers’ perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90070-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T, van den Berg, AE, Hagerhall, CM, Tomalak, M, Bauer, N, Hansmann, R, Ojala, A, Syngollitou, E, Carrus, G, van Herzele, A, Bell, S, Podesta, MTC and Waaseth, G 2011 Health benefits of nature experience: psychological, social and cul-tural processes. In: Nilsson, K, Sangster, M, Gallis, C, Hartig, T, de Vries, S, Seeland, K, and Schipperijn, J (eds) Forest, Trees and Human Health pp 127–168. Springer Science Business and Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, DJ, Ellsworth, PC and Gonzalez, R 2018 Are manipu-lation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology 9: 998. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, DJ and Schwarz, N 2016 Attentive Turkers: MTurk par-ticipants perform better on online attention checks than do sub-ject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods 48: 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosey, G 2008 A preliminary model of human-animal relation-ships in the zoo. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, K 2013 Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: do pos-itive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21: 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.681788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayawardena, BADS, Perera, BVP and Prasad, GAT 2002 Rehabilitation and release of orphaned elephants back into the wild in Sri Lanka. Gajah 21: 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21360Google Scholar
Jones, A 2016 Have we fallen out of love with elephant rides? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-36147265Google Scholar
Juvan, E and Dolnicar, S 2014 The attitude-behaviour gap in sus-tainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 48: 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassambara, A 2017 ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/Google Scholar
Kendall, HA, Lobao, LM and Sharp, JS 2006 Public concern with animal well-being: place, social structural location, and individ-ual experience. Rural Sociology 71: 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601106778070617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirch, W 2008 Data recoding. Encyclopedia of Public Health p 216. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5614-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontogeorgopoulos, N 2009a Wildlife tourism in semi-captive settings: a case study of elephant camps in northern Thailand. Current Issues in Tourism 12: 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500903042873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontogeorgopoulos, N 2009b The role of tourism in elephant welfare in Northern Thailand. Journal of Tourism 10: 1–19.Google Scholar
Kretzer, M 2017 9 ‘Jumbo’ reasons not to ride on an elephant. https://www.peta.org/blog/9-jumbo-reasons-to-avoid-elephant-rides/Google Scholar
Lawrence, AB, Vigors, B and Sandøe, P 2019 What is so positive about positive animal welfare? - a critical review of the literature. Animals 9: 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luebke, JF, Watters, JV, Packer, J, Miller, LJ and Powell, DM 2016 Zoo visitors’ affective responses to observing animal behav-iors. Visitor Studies 19: 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2016.1144028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magda, S, Spohn, O, Angkawanish, T, Smith, DA and Pearl, DL 2015 Risk factors for saddle-related skin lesions on elephants used in the tourism industry in Thailand. BMC Veterinary Research 11: 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0438-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzola, JJ, Walker, EJ, Shockley, KM and Spector, PE 2011 Examining stress in graduate assistants combining qualitative and quantitative survey methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5: 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811402086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, S 2012 A critique of FAWC's Five Freedoms as a frame-work for the analysis of animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9434-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahan, EA and Estes, D 2015 The effect of contact with nat-ural environments on positive and negative affect: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology 10: 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.994224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, MB, Huberman, AM and Saldaña, J 2014 Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Miller, LJ 2012 Visitor reaction to pacing behavior: influence on the perception of animal care and interest in supporting zoological insti-tutions. Zoo Biology 31: 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, LJ, Luebke, JF and Matiasek, J 2018 Viewing African and Asian elephants at accredited zoological institutions: conservation intent and perceptions of animal welfare. Zoo Biology 37: 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21445CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, KE, Han, Z, Robbins, J and Weary, DM 2018 Institutional transparency improves public perception of lab animal technicians and support for animal research. PLoS One 13: e0193262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mkono, M and Holder, A 2019 The future of animals in tourism recreation: social media as spaces of collective moral reflexivity. Tourism Management Perspectives 29: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, T, D’Cruze, NC and Macdonald, DW 2017 Unethical use of wildlife in tourism: what's the problem, who is responsible, and what can be done? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 25: 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1223087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, TP, Dahlsjö, CAL, Baker, SE, D’Cruze, NC and Macdonald, DW 2015 The customer isn't always right - conser-vation and animal welfare implications of the increasing demand for wildlife tourism. PLoS One 10: e0138939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, JM and Hodgkinson, M 1999 The motivation and social orientation of visitors attending a contemporary zoological park. Environment and Behavior 31: 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nekaris, KAI, Musing, L, Vazquez, AG and Donati, G 2015 Is tickling torture? Assessing welfare towards slow lorises (Nycticebus spp) within Web 2.0 videos. Folia Primatologica 86: 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444231CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, X and Fijn, N 2013 The use of visual media as a tool for investigating animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour 85: 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norkaew, T, Brown, JL, Bansiddhi, P, Somgird, C, Thitaram, C, Punyapornwithaya, V, Punturee, K, Vongchan, P, Somboon, N and Khonmee, J 2018 Body condition and adrenal glucocorticoid activity affects metabolic marker and lipid profiles in captive female elephants in Thailand. PLoS One 13: e0204965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norkaew, T, Brown, JL, Thitaram, C, Bansiddhi, P, Somgird, C, Punyapornwithaya, V, Punturee, K, Vongchan, P, Somboon, N and Khonmee, J 2019 Associations among tourist camp management, high and low tourist seasons, and welfare fac-tors in female Asian elephants in Thailand. PLoS One 14: e0218579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normando, S, Pollastri, I, Florio, D, Ferrante, L, Macchi, E, Isaja, V and de Mori, B 2018 Assessing animal welfare in animal-visitor interactions in zoos and other facilities. A pilot study involving giraffes. Animals 8: 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8090153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orams, MB 2000 Tourists getting close to whales, is it what whale-watching is all about? Tourism Management 21: 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00006-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ord, C and Jarernbanpot, S 2017 Understanding the Mahout's perspective. In: Ord, C (ed) Elephants in Asia, Ethically: Humane Experiences with Asia's Sacred Animal pp 42–45. Horizon Guides: Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, IC, Weeks, CA, Wilson, LRM and Nicol, CJ 2016 Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare. British Food Journal 118: 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2016-0065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, DM and Bullock, EVW 2014 Evaluation of factors affecting emotional responses in zoo visitors and the impact of emotion on conservation mindedness. Anthrozoös 27: 389–405. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303714X13903827488042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2018 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
Reade, LS and Waran, NK 1996 The modern zoo: how do peo-ple perceive zoo animals? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01014-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolo, JB and Bradshaw, GA 2016 Prevalence and patterns of complex PTSD in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). In: Bandara, N, Wickramaarachchi, T and de Zoysa, HN (eds) Asian Elephants in Culture and Nature pp 291–297. University of Kelaniya: Kelaniya, Sri LankaGoogle Scholar
Robbins, J, Franks, B and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2018 ‘More than a feeling’: an empirical investigation of hedonistic accounts of animal welfare. PLoS One 13: e0193864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossman, ZT, Padfield, C, Young, D and Hart, LA 2017 Elephant-initiated interactions with humans: individual differences and specific preferences in captive African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Frontiers in Veterinary Science 4: 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RStudio Team 2016 RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio Inc: Boston, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
Russo, CM 2015 If you love elephants, don't ever ride them. Here's why. https://www.thedodo.com/elephant-rides-trek-1132645600.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schänzel, HA and McIntosh, AJ 2000 An insight into the per-sonal and emotive context of wildlife viewing at the Penguin Place, Otago Peninsula, New Zealand. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8: 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, J and Rupf, R 2010 Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: a survey among students of different educational institutions. Journal for Nature Conservation 18: 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Burbach, J 2017 Taken for a ride. https://www.worldan-imalprotection.org.au/sites/default/files/media/au_files/taken_for_ a_ride_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Burbach, J 2020 Taken for a ride 2. https://dkt6rvnu67rqj.cloudfront.net/cdn/ff/Q8ye9Xs4gjSCzbbSAa xjiBYZ3jBlLqYdWg9-bUmz1T8/1597217172/public/media/Taken-For-A-Ride-v1.6-WEB_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Burbach, J, Ronfot, D and Srisangiam, R 2015 Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestri-na) and tiger (Panthera tigris) populations at tourism venues in Thailand and aspects of their welfare. PLoS One 10: e0139092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serpell, J 2004 Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare. Animal Welfare 13: 145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sricharatchanya, P 1989 Getting lumbered. Far Eastern Economic Review 143: 26–28Google Scholar
Su, B and Martens, P 2017 Public attitudes toward animals and the influential factors in contemporary China. Animal Welfare 26: 239–247. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.2.239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, I 2019 In defence of elephant tourism: the role of captive elephants in the 21st century. Gajah: 38-40Google Scholar
Tofield, S, Coll, RK, Vyle, B and Bolstad, R 2003 Zoos as a source of free choice learning. Research in Science & Technological Education 21: 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TripAdvisor 2020 TripAdvisor: improving animal welfare in tourism. https://www.tripadvisor.com/blog/animal-welfare-education-portal/Google Scholar
van der Meer, E, Botman, S and Eckhardt, S 2019 I thought I saw a pussy cat: portrayal of wild cats in friendly interactions with humans distorts perceptions and encourages interactions with wild cat species. PLoS One 14: e0215211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbos, RI, Zajchowski, CAB, Brownlee, MTJ and Skibins, JC 2018 ‘I'd like to be just a bit closer’: wildlife viewing proximity pref-erences at Denali National Park & Preserve. Journal of Ecotourism 17: 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2017.1410551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigors, B 2018 Reducing the consumer attitude-behaviour gap in animal welfare: the potential role of ‘nudges’. Animals 8: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8120232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigors, B 2019 Citizens’ and farmers’ framing of ‘positive animal welfare’ and the implications for framing positive welfare in com-munication. Animals 9: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, R 2016 Meet the heroes fighting to put a stop to the cruel practice of elephant riding. https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/asia/tourist-elephant-rides-laos-animal-protection-conservation-centre-sainyabuli-a7474296.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H 2009 ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag: New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H, Francois, R, Henry, L and Müller, K 2017 dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. https://dplyr.tidyverse.org/Google Scholar
Wickham, H and Henry, L 2018 tidyr: easily tidy data with “spread()” and “gather()” functions. https://tidyr.tidyverse.org/Google Scholar
Williams, P and Soutar, GN 2009 Value, satisfaction and behav-ioral intentions in an adventure tourism context. Annals of Tourism Research 36: 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, ML, Perdue, BM, Bloomsmith, MA and Maple, TL 2015 Rates of reinforcement and measures of compliance in free and protected contact elephant management systems. Zoo Biology 34: 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woods, B 1998 Animals on display: principles for interpreting captive wildlife. Journal of Tourism Studies 9: 28–39Google Scholar
Woods, B 2000 Beauty and the beast: preferences for animals in Australia. Journal of Tourism Studies 11: 25–35Google Scholar
World Animal Protection 2017 A close up on cruelty: the harmful impact of wildlife selfies in the Amazon. https://d31j74p4lpxrfp.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/int_files/amazon_selfies_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
World Tourism Organization 2018 UNWTO tourism highlights p 16. UNWTO: Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
World Travel and Tourism Council 2019 The economic impact of global wildlife tourism. https://travesiasdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/The-Economic-Impact-of-Global-Wildlife-Tourism-Final-19.pdfGoogle Scholar
Young, A, Khalil, KA and Wharton, J 2018 Empathy for animals: a review of the existing literature. Curator: The Museum Journal 61: 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, JA, Silberg, JN, Araujo, G, Labaja, J, Ponzo, A, Rollins, R and Dearden, P 2019 Applying the precautionary principle when feeding an endangered species for marine tourism. Tourism Management 72: 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Weston et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 195.1 KB