Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T20:52:22.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What do animals want?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

B Franks
B Franks*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York City, NY, USA; email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Motivation is a central concept for animal welfare; it has inspired methodological breakthroughs and generated a wealth of crucial empirical work. As the field develops beyond its original mandate to alleviate the suffering of animals in intensive farming systems, the assumptions behind the current models of motivation may warrant closer scrutiny. In this paper, I examine some of the complexities of studying motivation — for example, that what an animal wants can depend on its welfare and that, through genetic selection and housing choices, we can modify what an animal finds to be rewarding versus punishing. The central theme of this paper is, therefore, that we cannot just ask the animals under our care (or even in the wild) what they want and assume that we will receive unadulterated answers, free from human influence. While asking questions about animal motivation with empirical research is invaluable and necessary, our models drive our research questions, methodologies, and results’ interpretation. When the models we employ remain implicit (eg the only motivation questions worth asking are those that could be implemented within the current housing systems), they have ability to stifle progress in understanding animal welfare. Thus, in addition to the empirical work, we also need to expose and evaluate the models that drive the research. Making the models explicit will facilitate our ability to identify their areas of silence, assess their strengths and potential limitations, as well as examine how they conceptualise the relationship between motivation and animal welfare. I end with a discussion of the implications of a few relevant models, both implicit and explicit, noting how such consideration reveals exciting areas for future work, including, for example, research on the motivation to make choices and the motivation to learn.

Keywords

agencyanimal welfareanthropocentrismcontrafreeloadingmotivationpreference tests
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 1 - 10
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Addessi, E, Mancini, A, Crescimbene, L, Ariely, D and Visalberghi, E 2010 How to spend a token? Trade-offs between food variety and food preference in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioural Processes 83(3): 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2009.12.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, BK, Coambs, RB and Hadaway, PF 1978 The effect of housing and gender on morphine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 58: 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balcombe, JP 2009 Animal pleasure and its moral significance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 118(3-4): 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, M 2004 Mechanisms of decision-making and the inter-pretation of choice tests. Animal Welfare 13(1): S115–S120. https://www.researchgate.net/ 10.1017/S0962728600014457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 2013 Ignoring Nature No More: The Case for Compassionate Conservation. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226925363.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, MR, Meerts, SH and Sisk, CL 2010 Male Syrian hamsters demonstrate a conditioned place preference for sexual behavior and female chemosensory stimuli. Hormones and Behavior 58(3): 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.05.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissy, A, Manteuffel, G, Jensen, MB, Moe, RO, Spruijt, B, Keeling, LJ, Winckler, C, Forkman, B, Dimitrov, I, Langbein, J, Bakken, M, Veissier, I and Aubert, A 2007 Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology & Behavior 92(3): 375–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phys-beh.2007.02.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burn, CC 2017 Bestial boredom: a biological perspective on ani-mal boredom and suggestions for its scientific investigation. Animal Behaviour 130: 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbe-hav.2017.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J and Mason, GJ 2001 The use of operant technology to measure behavioral priorities in captive animals The use of operant technology to measure behavioral priorities in captive animals. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 33(3): 427–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwell, JFM, Franks, B and Higgins, ET 2014 Truth, con-trol, and value motivations: the ‘what’, ‘how’, and ‘why’ of appro-ach and avoidance. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2008 The science of animal suffering. Ethology 114(10): 937-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01557.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 2017 Animal welfare with and without conscious-ness. Journal of Zoology 301(1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, NJ, Both, C, Drent, PJ, Van Oers, K and Van Noordwijk, AJ 2002 Repeatability and heritability of exploratory behaviour in great tits from the wild. Animal Behaviour 64: 929–938. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, IJ 1998 Behavior and behavioral needs. Poultry Science 77(12): 1766–1772. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1766CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, EW, Aknin, LB and Norton, MI 2008 Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science 319(5870): 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, EW, Ashton-James, CE, Hanson, MD and Aknin, LB 2010 On the costs of self-interested economic behavior how does stinginess get under the skin? Journal of Health Psychology 15(4): 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309356366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmore, MRP, Garner, JP, Johnson, AK, Kirkden, RD, Richert, BT and Pajor, EA 2012 If you knew what was good for you! The value of environmental enrichments with known welfa-re benefits is not demonstrated by sows using operant techniqu-es. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 15(3): 2540271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2012.683982CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elwood, RW and Appel, M 2009 Pain experience in hermit crabs? Animal Behaviour 77(5): 1243–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennaceur, A, Michalikova, S and Chazot, PL 2006 Models of anxiety: Responses of rats to novelty in an open space and an enclo-sed space. Behavioural Brain Research 171(1): 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2006.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, WJ and Wilczynski, W 2006 Aggressive experience alters place preference in green anole lizards, Anolis carolinensis. Animal Behaviour 71: 1155–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbe-hav.2005.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, J, Solà-Oriol, D, Manteca, X, Pérez, JF and Dwyer, DM 2015 Anhedonia in pigs? Effects of social stress and restraint stress on sucrose preference. Physiology and Behavior 151: 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, R and Millam, JR 2007 Novelty and individual differences influence neophobia in orange-winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 104(1-2): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, B 2017 Cognition as a cause, consequence, and component of welfare. In: Mench, JA (ed) Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare: Science and Practice. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
Franks, B, Champagne, FA and Higgins, ET 2013a How enri-chment affects exploration trade-offs in rats: implications for wel-fare and well-being. PLoS One 8(12): e83578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, B, Chen, C, Manley, K and Higgins, ET 2015 Effective challenge regulation coincides with promotion focus-related suc-cess and emotional well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies 7(3): 981–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9627-7Google Scholar
Franks, B and Higgins, ET 2012 Effectiveness in humans and other animals: A common basis for well-being and welfare. In: Olson JM and Zanna MP (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 46 pp 285–346. Elsevier Academic Press: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Franks, B, Higgins, ET and Champagne, FA 2012 Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Comparative Psychology 126(4): 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, B, Higgins, ET and Champagne, FA 2014 A theoretical-ly based model of rat personality with implications for welfare. PLoS One 9(4): e95135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, B, Reiss, D, Cole, P, Friedrich, V, Thompson, N and Higgins, ET 2013b Predicting how individuals approach enri-chment: Regulatory focus in cotton top tamarins (Sanguinus oedi-pus). Zoo Biology 32(4): 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 2008 Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell: Ames, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Duncan, IJH 1998 ‘Pleasures’,’pains’ and animal wel-fare: Toward a natural history of affect. Animal Welfare 7(4): 383–39610.1017/S0962728600020935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D and Nicol, CJ 2018 Preference and motivation rese-arch. In: Appleby, MC, Mench, JA, Olsson, IAS and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare, Third Edition pp 213–231. CABI: Cambridge, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390202.0213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureix, C, Beaulieu, C, Argaud, S, Rochais, C, Quinton, M, Henry, S, Hausberger, M and Mason, GJ 2015 Investigating anhedonia in a non-conventional species: Do some riding horses Equus caballus display symptoms of depression? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 162: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appla-nim.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureix, C and Meagher, RK 2015 What can inactivity (in its various forms) reveal about affective states in non-human animals? A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 171: 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, LP, Franks, B, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2016 Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) prefer and are less aggressive in darker environments. PLoS One 11(3): e0151325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gjerris, M, Nielsen, MEJ and Sandøe, P 2013 The Good, the Right and the Fair: An Introduction to Ethics. College Publications: Milton Keynes, UKGoogle Scholar
Gygax, L 2017 Wanting, liking and welfare: The role of affective states in proximate control of behaviour in vertebrates. Ethology 123: 689–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, ET 1997 Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist 52(12): 1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, ET 2006 Value from hedonic experience and engage-ment. Psychological Review 113(3): 439. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, ET 2012 Beyond Pleasure and Pain: How Motivation Works. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
Higgins, ET, Cornwell, JFM and Franks, B 2014 ‘Happiness’ and ‘The Good Life’ as motives working together effectively. Advances in Motivation Science 1: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2014.08.004Google Scholar
Inglis, IR, Forkman, B and Lazarus, J 1997 Free food or ear-ned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Animal Behaviour 53: 1171–1191. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, MB and Pedersen, LJ 2008 Using motivation tests to assess ethological needs and preferences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 113(4): 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2008.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P and Toates, FM 1993 Who needs ‘behavioural needs?’ Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37(2): 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90108-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkden, RD and Pajor, EA 2006 Using preference, motivation and aversion tests to ask scientific questions about animals’ fee-lings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100(1-2): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornum, AL, Röcklinsberg, H and Gjerris, M 2017 The concept of behavioural needs in contemporary fur science: Do we know what American mink (Mustela vison) really need? Animal Welfare 26(2): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.2.151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R, Steinberg, H and Stolerman, IP 1968 Inducing a preference for morphine in rats without premedication. Nature 218: 564–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/222385a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, AB, Newberry, RC and Špinka, M 2018 Positive welfare: What does it add to the debate over pig welfare? Advances in Pig Welfare p 415. Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101012-9.00014-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makowska, IJ and Weary, DM 2016 The importance of burrowing, climbing and standing upright for laboratory rats. Royal Society Open Science 3(6): 160136. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marino, L 2017 Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emoti-on, and behavior in the domestic chicken. Animal Cognition 20:127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1064-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ, Cooper, J and Clarebrough, C 2001 Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410(6824): 35–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ, McFarland, D and Garner, JP 1998 A demanding task: using economic techniques to assess animal priorities. Animal Behaviour 55: 1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0692CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meagher, RK 2019 Is boredom an animal welfare concern? Animal Welfare 28: 21–32. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, JH and Robbers, Y 2014 Wheel running in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1786): 20140210. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ 2014 Positive animal welfare states and reference standards for welfare assessment. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63(1): 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.926802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, DJ and Beausoleil, N 2015 The Five Domains Model. Animal Welfare 25: 241–253. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.3.241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, SR 1977 Free food (contrafreeloading) phenomenon, review and analysis. Animal Learning & Behavior 5(3): 221–235. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, D and Delon, N 2017 Meaning in the lives of humans and other animals. Philosophical Studies 123(1): 193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0869-6Google Scholar
Sherwin, CM 1998 Voluntary wheel running: a review and novel interpretation. Animal Behaviour 56: 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriver, A 2009 Knocking out pain in livestock: can technology succeed where morality has stalled? Neuroethics 2(3): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-009-9048-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sih, A, Mathot, KJ, Moirón, M, Montiglio, PO, Wolf, M and Dingemanse, NJ 2014 Animal personality and state-behaviour feedbacks: a review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30(1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneddon, LU, Elwood, RW, Adamo, SA and Leach, MC 2014 Defining and assessing animal pain. Animal Behaviour 97: 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špinka, M 2006 How important is natural behaviour in animal far-ming systems? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 100(1-2): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špinka, M 2019 Animal agency, animal awareness and animal wel-fare. Animal Welfare 28: 11–20. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Špinka, M and Wemelsfelder, F 2018 Environmental challenge and animal agency. In: Appleby, MC (ed) Animal Welfare, Third Edition pp 39–55. CAB International: Cambridge, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786390202.0039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Keyserlingk, MAG, Amorim Cestari, A, Franks, B, Fregonesi, JA and Weary, DM 2017 Dairy cows value access to pasture as highly as fresh feed. Scientific Reports 7: 44953. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44953CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, M, Diez-Leon, M and Mason, GJ 2014 Animal welfare science: Recent publication trends and future research priorities. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 27(1): 80–10010.46867/ijcp.2014.27.01.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Droege, P and Braithwaite, VA 2017 Behavioral evidence of felt emotions: approaches, inferences and refine-ments. Advances in the Study of Behavior 49: 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2017.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM and Robbins, JA 2019 Understanding the multiple conceptions of animal welfare. Animal Welfare 28: 33–40. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM and Vestergaard, K 1991 The seeking of novelty and its relation to play. Animal Behaviour 42(4): 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80243-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, JW 2016 Quality of life and animal behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 181: 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeates, JW 2018 Naturalness and animal welfare. Animals 8(4): 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8040053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeates, JW and Main, DCJ 2008 Assessment of positive welfare: A review. Veterinary Journal 175(3): 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.05.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed