Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:56:26.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare Implications of the Night Shooting of Wild Impala (Aepyceros Melampus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

A R Lewis ,
A M Pinchin  and
S C Kestin
A R Lewis
Affiliation:
MAFF, Government Buildings, Alphington Road, Exeter, Devon EX2 8NQ, UK
A M Pinchin*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY, UK
S C Kestin
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The most common method of culling impala (Aepyceros melampus) and many other antelope species in Africa was evaluated from a welfare point of view. The culling of 856 impala from 401 herds was observed and recorded in the Mkuzi Game Reserve, South Africa. Ninety-three per cent of animals were killed instantaneously by the first shot. Results indicated that herd size and composition, distance of herd from hunting vehicle and shot number all have a bearing on the number of animals wounded and missed. It is concluded that the culling of free-ranging impala by night-hunting in the manner described is a satisfactory method on welfare grounds, although a number of recommendations are made which might render the culling process more humane. It is argued that economic and welfare considerations are not necessarily in conflict, and long-term efficiency is likely to be enhanced by addressing both simultaneously.

Keywords

animal welfarecullingimpalawildlife
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , May 1997 , pp. 123 - 131
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anil, M H and McKinstry, J L 1993 Results of a Survey of Pig Abattoirs in England and Wales. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: Tolworth, UKGoogle Scholar
Bothma, J D U P 1989 Game Ranch Management. J L Van Schaik: Pretoria, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Child, G, Smith, M B E and Van Richter, W 1970 Tsetse control hunting as a measure of large mammal population trends in the Okavango Delta Botswana. Mammalia 34: 34–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, C C and Whittington, P E 1992 Survey of Captive Bolt Sunning in British Abattoirs. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Department of National Parks 1992 Elephant Management in Zimbabwe. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management: Harare, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
Eltringham, S K 1988 Killing with Kindness - Wildlife Management and Animal Welfare. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fairall, N 1985 Manipulation of sex ratios to optimise production from impala populations. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 15(3): 85–88Google Scholar
Geist, V 1971 A behavioural approach to the management of wild ungulates. In: Duffey, E and Watt, A S (eds) The Scientific Management of Animal and Plant Communities for Conservation pp 413–424. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1950 Wild Animals in Captivity. Butterworth: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, R R and Schotz, P 1968 Applied topographic-anatomical studies of East African game ruminants. East African Wildlife Journal 6: 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarman, P J and Jarman, M V 1974 Impala behaviour and its relevance to management. In: Geist V and Walther F (eds) The Behaviour of Ungulates in relation to Management. Vol 2 pp 871-881. International Union for the Conservation of Nature: Morges, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Kestin, S C 1995 Welfare aspects of the commercial slaughter of whales. Animal Welfare 4: 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Chevallerie, M 1971 Some effects of shooting on losses of meat and meat quality in springbok and impala. South African Journal of Animal Science 1: 113–116Google Scholar
Leuthold, W 1977 African Ungulates. A comparative review of their ethology and behavioural ecology. Springer Verlag: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Macartney, P 1975 Wildlife on Your Farm. Longman: RhodesiaGoogle Scholar
Schenkel, J 1966 On sociology and behaviour in impala. East African Wildlife Journal 4; 99–114Google Scholar
Tinley 1972 Cropping techniques. In: Mentis, M T (ed) Ungulate Management. Natal Parks Game and Fish Preservation Board: Natal, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Walther, F R 1969 Flight behaviour and avoidance of predators in thompsons gazelle. Behaviour 34(3): 184–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E and Wagner, L J J 1968 The impala as a source of food and by-products. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association 39(4): 81–86Google Scholar