Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:50:59.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of space, active and resting behaviour in fattening rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) housed in a combi park system: A case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

S Kimm ,
SL Rauterberg ,
J Bill ,
J Stracke ,
N Kemper  and
M Fels
S Kimm
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
SL Rauterberg
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
J Bill
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
J Stracke
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
N Kemper
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
M Fels*
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15 (Building 116), D-30173 Hannover, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this case study, a housing system for rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) was developed, complying with the new German Welfare Regulation, and evaluated on-farm with regard to the rabbits’ behaviour during four fattening periods. The housing system was characterised by the large group size of fatteners (maximum 65 animals per group, 12 animals per m2) due to the merging of six former single units for does and their litters, post-weaning. A large elevated platform, a box with a roof (small elevated platform), a tube and gnawing materials were made available per unit. The aim being to assess the suitability of the housing system for rabbits with regard to animal welfare, based on behavioural analyses. Therefore, the use of space by the rabbits (n = 247) was investigated by video analysis (instantaneous scan sampling) during daytime. Additionally, the individual behaviour of 20 focal rabbits in different locations was assessed by continuous sampling. Results showed that rabbits preferred to huddle together in the outer units in the first weeks post-weaning. The highest animal densities were found under and in front of the large and on the small platforms. The large platforms were visited increasingly from the 10th fattening day onwards. Elevated platforms supported resting and comfort behaviours. Non-elevated open-top areas enabled upright positions and locomotor behaviours. Aggression and stereotypic behaviours rarely occurred. We conclude that the housing system supported species-specific behaviour and seemed to cater for the needs of rabbits in terms of welfare. Nevertheless, further investigation is needed to ascertain the effects on animal health and performance.

Keywords

animal welfarecontinuous samplingGerman welfare regulationgrowing rabbitsinstantaneous scan samplingnew housing system
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 493 - 506
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Broom, DM 1983 Indicators Relevant to Farm Animal Welfare pp 81–87. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6738-0_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusini I, Carneiro M, Wang C, Rubin CJ, Ring H, Afonso S, Blanco-Aguiar JA, Ferrand N, Rafati N, Villafuerte R and Smedby Ö 2018 Changes in brain architecture are consistent with altered fear processing in domestic rabbits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 7380–7385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801024115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, S, Keeling, LJ and Tuyttens, FAM 2011a Behaviour and use of space in fattening rabbits as influenced by cage size and enrich-ment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 134: 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, S, Keeling, LJ, Vangestel, C, Baert, J, Vangeyte, J and Tuyttens, FAM 2011b Assessing attraction or avoidance between rabbits: comparison of distance-based methods to analyse spatial distribution. Animal Behaviour 82: 1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bosco, A, Castellini, C and Mugnai, C 2002 Rearing rabbits on a wire net floor or straw litter: behaviour, growth and meat qualitative traits. Livestock Production Science 75(2): 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00307-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, IC, Reuvekamp, BFJ and Rommers, JM 2011 A wel-fare assessment protocol for commercially housed rabbits. Report 532. Wageningen UR Livestock Research: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Drescher, B 1992 Housing of rabbits with respect to animal wel-fare. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research 15: 678–678Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2005 Scientific report: the impact of the current housing and husbandry systems on the health and welfare of farmed domestic rabbits. EFSA Journal 267: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2005.267Google Scholar
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2020 Health and welfare of rabbits farmed in different production systems. EFSA Journal 18: 5944. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5944Google Scholar
Hansen, LH and Berthelsen, H 2000 The effect of environmen-tal enrichment on the behaviour of caged rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00093-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilge, B 1991 The rabbit: a diurnal or a nocturnal animal? Journal of Experimental Animal Science 34: 170–183Google ScholarPubMed
Jordan, D, Štuhec, I, Peclin, G and Gorjanc, G 2003 The influ-ence of environment enrichment on the behaviour of fattening rab-bits housed in individual wire cages. Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furbearing Animals and Pet Animals pp 119–126. 14-15 May, 2003, Celle, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Keeling, LJ, Rushen, J and Duncan, IJ 2011 Understanding animal welfare. In: Appleby MC, Mench JA, Olsson IAS and Hughes BO (eds) Animal Welfare, Second Edition pp 13–26. CAB International: Oxon, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936594.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimm, S, Rauterberg, SL, Bill, J, Kemper, N and Fels, M 2019 Assessment of a new housing system in accordance with the TierSchNutztV with regard to behaviour and animal health of fat-tening rabbits. Proceedings of the 21th Symposium on Housing and Diseases of Rabbits, Furbearing Animals and Pet Animals pp 5–6. 16-17 May, 2019, Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Kraft, R 1978 Vergleichende Verhaltensstudien an Wild- und Hauskaninchen. Zeitschrift Für Tierzüchtung Und Züchtungsbiologie 95: 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.1978.tb01467.x. [Title translation: Comparative behavioural studies on wild and domestic rabbits]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambertini, L, Paci, G, Morittu, VM, Vignola, G, Orlandi, P, Zaghini, G and Formigoni, A 2005 Consequences of behaviour on productive performances of rabbits reared in pens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 4: 550–552. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2005.2s.550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, C and Hoy, S 2011 Investigations on the use of an elevated platform in group cages by growing rabbits. World Rabbit Science 19: 95–101. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2011.800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, M 1987 Interference of a restricted environment as found in battery cages with normal behaviour of young fattening rabbits. Agriculture: Rabbit production systems including welfare. Commission of the European Communities: 257-268Google Scholar
Lehmann, M 1990 Beschäftigungsbedürfnis bei jungen Hauskaninchen: Rohfaseraufnahme und Tiergerechtheit. Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde 132: 375–381. [Title translation: Employment needs in young domestic rabbits: raw fibre intake and animal welfare]Google Scholar
Lehmann, M 1991 Social behaviour in young domestic rabbits under semi-natural conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80049-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidfors, L 1997 Behavioural effects of environmental enrichment for individually caged rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01141-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, L, Fernández, N, Moreno, S and Villafuerte, R 2003 Habitat-related differences in rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) abundance, dis-tribution and activity. Journal of Mammalogy 84: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0026:HRDIRO>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luzi, F, Ferrante, V, Heinzl, E and Verga, M 2003 Effect of envi-ronmental enrichment on productive performance and welfare aspects in fattening rabbits. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2: 438–440. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2003.11676036Google Scholar
Maertens, L, Tuyttens, F and Van Poucke, E 2004 Group-housing of broiler rabbits: Performances in enriched vs barren pens. Proccedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress pp 1247–1250. 7-10 September, 2004, Puebla, MexicoGoogle Scholar
Matics, Z, Farkas, TP, Dal Bosco, A, Szendrő, Z, Filiou, E, Nagy, I, Odermatt, M, Paci, G and Gerencsér, Z 2017 Comparison of pens without and with multilevel platforms for growing rabbits. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17: 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1363640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matics, Z, Szendrő, Z, Bessei, W, Radnai, I, Biróné Németh, E, Orova, Z and Gyovai, P 2004 The free choice of rabbit among identically and differently sized cages. Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress pp 1251–1256. 7-10 September, 2004, Puebla, MexicoGoogle Scholar
Monclús, R, Rödel, HG, Von Holst, D and De Miguel, J 2005 Behavioural and physiological responses of naïve European rabbits to predator odour. Animal Behaviour 70: 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, DB, Jennings, M, Batchelor, GR, Bell, D, Birke, L, Davies, K, Eveleigh, JR, Gunn, D, Heath, M, Howard, B, Koder, P, Phillips, J, Poole, T, Sainsbury, AW, Sales, GD, Smith, DJA, Stauffacher, M and Turner, RJ 1993 Refinements in rabbit hus-bandry: second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW joint working group on refinement. Laboratory Animals 27: 301–329. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367793780745633Google Scholar
Parer, I 1977 The population ecology of the wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), in a Mediterranean-type climate in New South Wales. Wildlife Research 4: 171. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9770171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postollec, G, Boilletot, E, Maurice, R and Michel, V 2002 Effets de l'enrichissement du milieu sur les performances zootechniques et le comportement des lapins d'engraissement élevés en groupe. Proceedings of the Journée Nationale ITAVI sur l’élevage du lapin de chair p 10. 21 November, 2002, Nantes, France. [Title translation: Effects of environmental enrichment on zootechnical performance and behaviour of group-reared fattening rabbits]Google Scholar
Postollec, G, Boilletot, E, Maurice, R and Michel, V 2008 The effect of pen size and an enrichment structure (elevated platform) on the performances and the behaviour of fattening rabbits. Animal Welfare 17: 53–59Google Scholar
Princz, Z, Dalle Zotte, A, Metzger, S, Radnai, I, Biró-Németh, E, Orova, Z and Szendrő, Z 2009 Response of fattening rabbits reared under different housing conditions. 1. Live performance and health status. Livestock Science 121: 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Princz, Z, Dalle Zotte, A, Radnai, I, Bíró-Németh, E, Matics, Z, Gerencsér, Z, Nagy, I and Szendrõ, Z 2008a Behaviour of growing rabbits under various housing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111: 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.06.013Google Scholar
Princz, Z, Radnai, I, Biró-Németh, E, Matics, Z, Gerencsér, Z, Nagy, I and Szendrő, Z 2008b Effect of cage height on the wel-fare of growing rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauterberg, SL, Bill, J, Kimm, S, Kemper, N and Fels, M 2019a Effect of a new housing system on skin lesions, performance and soiling of fattening rabbits: A German case study. Animals 9: 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauterberg, SL, Bill, J, Kimm, S, Kemper, N and Fels, M 2019b Evaluation of two different flooring designs for rabbit housing in accordance with German Welfare Regulations: Soiling and mortality. Agriculture 9: 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9120257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommers, J and Meijerhof, R 1998 Effect of group size on per-formance, bone strength and skin lesions of meat rabbits housed under commercial conditions. World Rabbit Science 6: 299–302. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1998.360Google Scholar
Rommers, JM, Reuvekamp, BJ, Gunnink, H and de Jong, IC 2014 Effect of hiding places, straw and territory on aggression in group-housed rabbit does. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 157: 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szendrő, Z, Matics, Z, Odermatt, M, Gerencsér, Z, Nagy, I, Szendrő, K and Dalle Zotte, A 2012 Use of different areas of pen by growing rabbits depending on the elevated platforms’ floor-type. Animal 6: 650–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001819CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szendrő, Z and McNitt, JL 2012 Housing of rabbit does: Group and individual systems: A review. Livestock Science 150: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TierSchNutztV 2014 Anforderungen an das Halten von Kaninchen. Fünfte Verordnung zur Änderung der Tierschutz-Nutztierhaltungsverordnung (TierSchNutztV). Bonn, Germany. [Title translation: Requirements for keeping rabbits]Google Scholar
Trocino, A, Zomeño, C, Filiou, E, Birolo, M, White, P and Xiccato, G 2019 The use of environmental enrichments affects performance and behavior of growing rabbits housed in collective pens. Animals 9: 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080537CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verga, M, Zingarelli, I, Heinzl, E, Ferrante, V, Martino, PA and Luzi, F 2004 Effect of housing and environmental enrich-ment on performance and behaviour in fattening rabbits. Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress pp 1283–1288. 7-10 September, 2004, Puebla, MexicoGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 2016 Animal welfare: Freedoms, dominions and ‘a life worth living.’ Animals 6: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6060035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kimm et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 115.7 KB