Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T07:35:09.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a synthesis of conservation and animal welfare science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

D Fraser
D Fraser*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conservation biology and animal welfare science are multidisciplinary fields of research that address social concerns about animals. Conservation biology focuses on wild animals, works at the level of populations, ecological systems and genetic types, and deals with threats to biodiversity and ecological integrity. Animal welfare science typically focuses on captive (often domestic) animals, works at the level of individuals and groups, and deals with threats to the animals’ health and quality of life. However, there are many areas of existing or potential overlap: (i) many real-life problems, such as environmental contamination, urban development and transportation, create problems for animals that involve both welfare and conservation; (ii) research methods from each field are needed to address some of the scientific problems of the other; and (iii) policies and practices targeting either conservation or animal welfare may prove unproductive if they do not take account of both areas of concern. Moreover, scientists in both fields face the common challenge of applying science to guide policy and practice, often to issues that are both empirical and ethical, and often under conditions of uncertainty. There are many cases where communication and co-operation between the fields should lead to better science and better practical outcomes.

Keywords

animal welfareanimal welfare scienceconservationconservation biologyinterdisciplinary sciencepolicy
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 121 - 124
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anderson 2003 Wireless telecommunications and night flying birds: We may be sacrificing millions of migrants for convenience, entertainment and profit. Biodiversity 4(1): 10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blancou, J 2003 History of the Surveillance and Control of Transmissible Animal Diseases. OIE: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, DT 2010 Conservation and animal welfare issues arising from forestry practices. Animal Welfare 19: 151–157Google Scholar
Bradshaw, EL and Bateson, P 2000 Animal welfare and wildlife conservation. In: Gosling, LM and Sutherland, WJ (eds) Behaviour and Conservation pp 330–348. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, VA and Salvanes, AGV 2010 Aquaculture and restocking: implications for conservation and welfare. Animal Welfare 19: 139–149Google Scholar
Conrad, JM 2005 Open access and extinction of the passenger pigeon in North America. Natural Resource Modeling 18: 501–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1980 Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, TR 1988 Saving America's Wildlife. Princeton University Press: Princeton, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO 2009 ResourceSTAT: land. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. http://faostat.fao.org/site/377/default.aspx#ancorGoogle Scholar
Forman, RTT and Alexander, LE 1998 Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, AF 1974 Introducing a new scientific journal. Applied Animal Ethology 1: 1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 2008 Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in itsCultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Harwood, D 1928 Love for Animals and How it Developed in Great Britain. Re-published 2002 as: Preece R and Fraser D (eds) Dix Harwood's Love for Animals and How it Developed in Great Britain (1928). Edwin Mellen Press: Lewiston, USAGoogle Scholar
Hornaday, WT 1889 The Extermination of the American Bison. Government Printing Office: Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
Jacob, J 2003 Short-term effects of farming practices on populations of common voles. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95: 321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jędrzejewski, W and Jędrzejewska, B 1996 Rodent cycles in relation to biomass and productivity of ground vegetation and predation in the Palearctic. Acta Theriologica 41: 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klem, D Jr 1990 Collisions between birds and windows: Mortality and prevention. Journal of Field Ornithology 61: 120–128Google Scholar
Littin, KE 2010 Animal welfare and pest control: meeting both conservation and animal welfare goals. Animal Welfare 19: 171–176Google Scholar
Mathews, F 2010 Wild animal conservation and welfare in agricultural sytems. Animal Welfare 19: 159–170Google Scholar
Paquet, PC and Darimont, CT 2010 Wildlife conservation and animal welfare: two sides of the same coin? Animal Welfare 19: 177–190Google Scholar
Perry, D and Perry, G 2008 Improving interactions between animal rights groups and conservation biologists. Conservation Biology 22: 27–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawles, K 1997 Conservation and animal welfare. In: Chappell, TDJ (ed) The Philosophy of the Environment pp 135–155. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Soulé, ME 1985 What is conservation biology? BioScience 35: 727–734Google Scholar
Swaisgood, RR 2010 The conservation-welfare nexus in reintroduction programmes: a role for sensory ecology. Animal Welfare 19: 125–137Google Scholar
Thorpe, WH 1965 The assessment of pain and distress in animals. In: Brambell FWR (chairman) Report of the Technical Committee in Enquire into the Welfare of Animals Kept Under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems, Appendix III. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Turner, ES 1964 All Heaven in a Rage. Michael Joseph: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Walker, KA, Horning, M, Mellish, JE and Weary, DM 2010 Behavioural responses of juvenile Steller sea lions to abdominal surgery: Developing an assessment of post-operative pain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120: 201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar