Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T07:26:18.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A survey of animal welfare experts and practicing veterinarians to identify and explore key factors thought to influence canine and feline welfare in relation to veterinary care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

LC Dawson ,
CE Dewey ,
EA Stone ,
MT Guerin  and
L Niel
LC Dawson
Affiliation:
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
CE Dewey
Affiliation:
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
EA Stone
Affiliation:
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
MT Guerin
Affiliation:
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
L Niel*
Affiliation:
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Veterinary care is important for maintaining companion animal health; however, it also has the potential to impact other aspects of patient welfare. To investigate factors related to veterinary care that are likely to influence canine and feline welfare, animal welfare researchers, veterinarians with an expertise in animal welfare, and Canadian and American companion and mixed animal veterinarians were invited to participate in a three-stage online survey. Participants were asked to do the following: i) identify factors related to the veterinary experience that impact patient welfare; ii) rate the relative impact of each factor; and iii) gauge the feasibility of measuring and improving each factor. Overall, 78 participants identified 85 factors that impact animal welfare in the clinic (eg restraint techniques) and home environment (eg advice regarding behaviour and training). Among factors, seven themes emerged: physical environment of the clinic; routine animal care provided by veterinary team members (‘staff); interactions between the patient, staff, and client; clinic management; medical and surgical procedures; staff attitudes and education; and communication between the veterinarian and client. Mean relative impact scores ranged from 1.0 to 3.8 on a five-point scale (0-4), with 70% of factors receiving a score greater than 3. Most participants (> 80%) agreed that 68% of the identified factors could be feasibly improved in an average veterinary clinic and that 43% of the factors could be feasibly measured during a welfare assessment. These results identify key areas where veterinary care may impact the welfare of canine and feline patients and highlight priority areas where assessment and improvement are possible.

Keywords

animal welfareassessmentcatcompanion animaldogveterinary practice
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

American Veterinary Medical Association 2007 US Pet Ownership and Demographic Sourcebook. American Veterinary Medical Association: Schaumburg, USAGoogle Scholar
Bartussek, H 1999 A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for the assessment of animals’ well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Livestock Production Science 61: 179–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00067-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, BV 1999 Canine Behavior: A Guide for Veterinarians. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Blokhuis, HJ, Veissier, I, Miele, M and Jones, B 2010 The Welfare Quality® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A 60: 129–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2010.523480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V and Clarke, V 2006 Using thematic analysis in psychol-ogy. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, EL, Whiting, MC, Abeyesinghe, SM, Asher, L, Corr, S and Wathes, CM 2013 A survey of stakeholder's opin-ions on the priority issues affecting the welfare of companion dogs in Great Britain. Animal Welfare 22: 239–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, SB and Forkman, B 2007 Assessment of animal welfare in a veterinary context: a call for ethologists. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106: 203–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, D, Roscher, A, Scheipl, F, Küchenhoff, H and Erhard, MH 2009 Fear-related behaviour of dogs in veterinary practice. The Veterinary Journal 182: 38–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.05.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical con-cerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205Google Scholar
Freeman, LM, Rush, JE and Farabaugh, AE 2005 Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing health-related quality of life in dogs with cardiac disease. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 1864–1868. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.226.1864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glardon, OJ, Hartnack, S and Horisberger, L 2010 Analyse du comportement des chiens et des chats pendant l'examen phys-ical en cabinet vétérinaire. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 152: 69–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0036-7281.a000016. [Title translation: Analysis of dogs and cats behaviour during the physical examination in veterinary practice].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godbout, M, Palestrini, C, Beauchamp, G and Frank, D 2007 Puppy behavior at the veterinary clinic: A pilot study. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 2: 126–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2007.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, P, Johannesson, T and Sandøe, P 2001 Assessment of farm animal welfare at herd level: many goals, many methods. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A Supplement 30: 26–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcella, KL 1983 A note on canine aggression towards veteri-narians. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 155–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(83)90118-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodan, I 2010 Understanding feline behaviour and application for appropriate handling and management. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine 25(4): 178–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tcam.2010.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodan, I, Sundahl, E, Carney, H, Gagnon, A, Heath, S, Landsberg, G, Seksel, K and Yin, S 2011 AAFP and ISFM feline-friendly handling guidelines. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 13: 364–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2011.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanford, TL 1981 Behavior of dogs entering a veterinary clinic. Applied Animal Ethology7: 271-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(81)90083-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Väisänen, MA, Valros, AE, Hakaoja, E, Raekallio, M and Vainio, O 2005 Pre-operative stress in dogs: a preliminary inves-tigation of behavior and heart rate variability in healthy hospital-ized dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 32: 158–167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, JO, Felsted, KE, Thomas, GJ and Siren, CW 2011 Executive summary of the Bayer veterinary care usage study. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 238(10): 1275–1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.238.10.1275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollmer, PJ 1977 Conditioned avoidance response to the veteri-nary clinic in dogs: How it begins/how to prevent it. Veterinary Medicine & Small Animal Clinician 72(11): 1719–1720Google Scholar
Whay, HR, Main, DCJ, Green, LE and Webster, AJF 2003 Animal-based measures for the assessment of welfare state of dairy cattle, pigs and laying hens: consensus of expert opinion. Animal Welfare 12: 205–217Google Scholar
Wiseman-Orr, ML, Nolan, AM, Reid, J and Scott, EM 2004 Development of a questionnaire to measure the effects of chron-ic pain on health-related quality of life in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1077–1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazbek, KVB and Fantoni, DT 2005 Validity of a health-relat-ed quality-of-life scale for dogs with signs for pain secondary to cancer. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226(8): 1354–1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.226.1354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, S 2009 Low Stress Handling, Restraint and Behavior Modification of Dogs and Cats: Techniques for Developing Patients Who Love Their Visits. CattleDog Publishing: Davis, USAGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dawson et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 136.9 KB