Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:22:12.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subjective and Objective Assessment of Pain and Discomfort Due to Lameness in Dairy Cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K A O'Callaghan*
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry, Leahurst, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK
P J Cripps
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry, Leahurst, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK
D Y Downham
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Liverpool L69 7ZL, UK
R D Murray
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science and Animal Husbandry, Leahurst, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pain experienced by lame cattle is often masked by their instinctive stoicism, leading to delayed detection and treatment of lameness. This paper investigates the usefulness of posture scoring during locomotion and the evaluation of daily activity levels as indicators of pain and discomfort resulting from lameness in dairy cattle. In this study, 345 lactating cattle were observed over a seven-month winter housing period. The posture of each cow was scored twice weekly using a subjective five-point numerical rating scale. Daily activity levels were measured objectively using pedometers. The effect of lameness on behaviour was addressed. Increased posture scores were associated with the presence of foot lesions (P < 0.001) and with reduced daily activity levels (P < 0.001). In comparison to sound cows, lame cows showed lower daily activity levels (P < 0.001). These results improve understanding of pain-related behaviours in cattle, and such an approach may assist future development of welfare assessment systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Kestin, S C, Knowles, T G, Tinch, A E and Gregory, N G 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manson, F J and Leaver, J D 1988 The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Production 47: 185190Google Scholar
McGeown, D, Danbury, T C, Waterman-Pearson, A and Kestin, S C 1999 Effect of carprofen on lameness in broiler chickens. Veterinary Record 144: 668671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D and Stafford, K 1999 Assessing and minimising the distress caused by painful husbandry procedures in ruminants. In Practice 21: 436446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, D B and Griffiths, P H M 1985 Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Veterinary Record 116: 431436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R D, Downham, D Y, Clarkson, M J, Faull, W B, Hughes, J W, Manson, F J, Merritt, J B, Russell, W B, Sutherst, J E and Ward, W R 1996 Epidemiology of lameness in dairy cattle: description and analysis of foot lesions. Veterinary Record 138: 586591CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toussaint Raven, E 1985 Trimming. In: Cattle Footcare and Claw Trimming pp 75106. Farming Press Books: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Welsh, E M, Gettinby, G and Nolan, A M 1993 Comparison of a visual analogue scale and a numerical rating-scale for assessment of lameness, using sheep as a model. American Journal of Veterinary Research 54: 976983Google Scholar
Whay, H R, Waterman, A E and Webster, A J F 1997 Associations between locomotion, claw lesions and nociceptive threshold in heifers during the peri-partum period. Veterinary Journal 154: 155161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed