Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T11:11:35.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stunning pigs with different gas mixtures: gas stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Dalmau ,
P Llonch ,
P Rodríguez ,
JL Ruíz-de-la-Torre ,
X Manteca  and
A Velarde
A Dalmau*
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n Monells, 17121, Girona, Spain
P Llonch
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n Monells, 17121, Girona, Spain
P Rodríguez
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n Monells, 17121, Girona, Spain
JL Ruíz-de-la-Torre
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, School of Veterinary Science, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Campus Bellaterra, edifici V, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, School of Veterinary Science, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Campus Bellaterra, edifici V, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
A Velarde
Affiliation:
IRTA, Animal Welfare Subprogram, Finca Camps i Armet s/n Monells, 17121, Girona, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stability and uniformity of the following gas mixtures: 90% argon; 85% argon and 15% carbon dioxide (CO2); 70% argon and 30% CO2; 98% nitrogen (N2); 92% N2 and 8% CO2; 90% N2 and 10% CO2; 85% N2 and 15% CO2; 80% N2 and 20% CO2; 70% N2 and 30% CO2; and 90% CO2 by volume in atmospheric air were assessed in a commercial dip-lift stunning system when the cradle was either stationary or in motion. The gas mixtures of 90% argon, 85% argon and 15% CO2, 70% argon and 30% CO2, 85% N2 and 15% CO2, 80% N2 and 20% CO2, 70% N2 and 30% CO2 and 90% CO2 by volume in atmospheric air could be sustained in a commercial dip-lift stunning system. The stability of the gas mixtures 92% N2 and 8% CO2, and 90% N2 and 10% CO2 by volume in atmospheric air were lower than in the previous cases. On the other hand, an N2 concentration higher than 94% by volume in atmospheric air could not be sustained in the stunning system. In addition, gas mixtures of argon and CO2 showed a higher stability than gas mixtures of N2 and CO2. The uniformity at different levels inside the pit (defined as the capacity of the gas to maintain its concentration constant at different levels inside the pit) was higher in 90% argon, or argon and CO2 mixtures and N2 and CO2 mixtures than in 90% CO2. This fact ensures that for the whole time the animals are inside the pit, the same conditions are applied, which is not the case for 90% CO2.

Keywords

animal welfareargoncarbon dioxidenitrogenstabilitystunning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 315 - 323
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cameron, AC and Trivedi, PK 1998 Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
EFSA 2004 Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing method. Scientific Report of the Scientific Panel of Animal Health and Welfare on a Request from the Commission. Question. Adopted on the 15th of June 2004. Brussels. http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/ahaw/ahaw_opinions/495/opinion_ahaw_02_ej45_stunning_repor t_v2_en1.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, ABM 1999 Behaviour of pigs exposed to mixtures of gases and the time required to stun and kill them: welfare implications. Veterinary Record 144: 165–168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, ABM and Gregory, NG 1995 Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 1. Determination of aversion to the initial inhalation of carbon dioxide or argon. Animal Welfare 4: 273–280Google Scholar
Raj, ABM and Gregory, NG 1996 Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 2. Stress of induction of anaesthesia. Animal Welfare 5: 71–78Google Scholar
Raj, ABM, Johnson, SP, Wotton, SB and McKinstry, JL 1997 Welfare implications of gas stunning pigs 3. The time to loss of somatosensory-evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of pigs during exposure to gases. Veterinary Journal 153: 329–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velarde, A, Gispert, M, Faucitano, L, Manteca, X and Diestre, A 2000 The effect of stunning method on the incidence of PSE and haemorrhages in pork carcasses. Meat Science 55: 309–314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed