Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:44:17.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective breeding in fighting dogs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

FD McMillan*
Affiliation:
Best Friends Animal Society, 5001 Angel Canyon Rd, Kanab, UT 84741, USA
PJ Reid
Affiliation:
ASPCA Animal Behavior Center, 1717 S Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL 61802, USA
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The breeding of domestic dogs for dog fighting has resulted in numerous genetic alterations in a breed widely acknowledged to be the most successful fighting dog: the American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT). Much of the genetic foundation underlying the motivation and ability for pit fighting can be traced back to the earliest use of dogs for hunting purposes and continued through the selective breeding for use of dogs in wars and bull and bear baiting. In the development of the APBT as a fighting dog, there were two main breeding criteria. The first was, and remains, fighting success. The trait most prized by breeders of fighting dogs and considered most contributory to fighting success is ‘gameness’, which is the perseverance at a task even under extreme adversity, such as injury, pain, or fatigue. The second criterion was the absence of human-directed aggression. Since dogs are handled extensively before, during, and after the fights, dogs that showed aggression toward humans were eliminated from the gene pool. Indeed, anecdotal reports suggest that breeding may have been carried beyond that of simply selecting against human aggressiveness to a degree of enhanced affinity for humans. The result is that today's fight-bred APBT is genetically predisposed — but not predestined — to aggressiveness toward other dogs and a strong social attraction to humans. The human affinity trait is a highly valuable characteristic that ought to be preserved. With the appropriate breeding decisions, the power of genetic selection suggests that this goal, along with normalising the genetic disposition for conspecific aggressive tendencies, should be ultimately achievable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Adamson, E 2008 Once upon a bull and terrier. American Pit Bull Terriers 45: 510Google Scholar
American Canine Temperament Testing Association 2009 ATTS Breed Statistics. www.atts.org/statistics.htmlGoogle Scholar
American Dog Breeders Association 2009 ADBA Conformation Standard Breakdown. www.adbadog.com/uploads/conformation%20_%20weightpull%20pic/2008%20conformationBreakdwn.pdfGoogle Scholar
American Kennel Club 2009 American Staffordshire Terrier. www.akc.org/breeds/American_staffordshire_terrier/index.cfmGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2009a Powerhouse Roadwork Keep. www.gamedogs.com/powerhousekeep.htmGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2009b History of the APBT. www.gamedogs.com/hist.htmGoogle Scholar
Armitage, GC 1935 Thirty Years with Fighting Dogs. Jack Jones: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, DK and Trut, LN 1975 Some genetic and endocrine effects of selection for domestication in silver foxes. In: Fox, MW (ed) The Wild Canids pp 416426. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Boyko, AR, Boyko, RH, Boyko, CM, Parker, HG, Castelhano, M, Corey, L, Degenhardt, JD, Auton, A, Hedimbi, M, Kityo, R, Ostrander, EA, Schoenebeck, J, Todhunter, RJ, Jones, P and Bustamante, CD 2009 Complex population structure in African village dogs and its implication for inferring dog domestication history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 1390313908Google Scholar
Clifford, DH, Boatfield, MP and Rubright, J 1983 Observations on fighting dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 183: 654657Google ScholarPubMed
Clutton-Brock, J 1987 A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. University of Texas Press: Austin, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, J 1995 Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In: Serpell, J (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People pp 720. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH and Albon, SD 1979 The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertising. Behaviour 69: 145170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coile, DC 2008 But he's such a good dog! American Pit Bull Terriers 45: 117122Google Scholar
Colby, JL 1936 The American Pit Bull Terrier. The News Publishing Co: Sacramento, California, USAGoogle Scholar
Colby, LB and Jessup, D 1997 Colby's Book of the American Pit Bull Terrier. TFH Publications: Neptune City, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Copold, S 1977 Hounds, Hares and Other Creatures: The Complete Book of Coursing. Donald R Hoflin: Arvada, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
Coppinger, R and Schneider, R 1995 Evolution of working dogs. In: Serpell, J (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People pp 21-27. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Coppinger, R and Coppinger, L 2001 Dogs: A Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior, and Evolution. Scribner: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Coren, S 1994 The Intelligence of Dogs. Free Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Dinnage, J, Bollen, K and Giacoppo, S 2004 Animal fighting. In: Miller, L and Zawistowski, S (eds) Shelter Medicine for Veterinarians and Staff pp 511521. Blackwell Publishing: Ames, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
Duffy, DL, Hsu, Y and Serpell, JA 2008 Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 114: 441460Google Scholar
Fitz-Barnard, L 1921 Fighting Sports. Odhams Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fleig, D 1996 History of Fighting Dogs. TFH Publications: Neptune City, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Flynn, JP 1969 Neural aspects of attack behaviour in cats. Experimental Approaches to the Study of Emotional Behaviour: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 159: 10081012Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, MW 1971 Socio-infantile and socio-sexual signals in canids: a comparative and ontogenetic study. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 28: 185210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gácsi, M, Topál, J, Miklósi, A, Dóka, A and Csányi, V 2001 Attachment behavior of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers, forming new bonds. Journal of Comparative Psychology 115: 423431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosling, SD 2009 The uses and abuses of personality assessments in dog shelters. Talk presented at the Interdisciplinary Forum on Applied Animal Behavior, Thirteenth Annual Meeting. 28 February 2009, Tucson, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, RA 1974 The dog in prehistoric and early historic Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science 1: 151175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, M 1999 A Complete History of Fighting Dogs. Howell Book House: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Ichihashi, T, Ichikawa, Y and Matsushima, T 2004 A nonsocial and isolate rearing condition induces an irreversible shift toward continued fights in the male fighting fish (Betta splendens). Zoological Science 21: 723729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessup, D 1995 The Working Pit Bull. TFH Publications: Neptune City, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Karino, K and Someya, C 2007 The influence of sex, line, and fight experience on aggressiveness of the Siamese fighting fish in intrasexual competition. Behavioural Processes 75: 283289Google ScholarPubMed
Kukekova, AV, Acland, GM, Oskina, IN, Kharlamova, AV, Trut, LN, Chase, K, Lark, KG, Erb, HN and Aquirre, GD 2006 The genetics of domesticated behavior in canids: What can dogs and silver foxes tell us about each other? In: Ostrander, EA, Giger, U and Lindblad-Toh, L (eds) The Dog and Its Genome pp 515537. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Kukekova, AV, Oskina, IN, Kharlamova, AV, Chase, K, Temnykh, SV, Johnson, JL, Pivovarova, IV, Shepeleva, DV, Vladimirova, A, Semenova, TI, Gulievich, RG, Schikhevich, SG, Graphodatsky, AS, Aquirre, GD, Erb, HN, Lark, KG, Acland, GM and Trut, LN 2008 Fox farm experiment: Hunting for behavioral genes. Becmhuk; Boruc 12: 5062Google Scholar
Lockwood, R 1995 The ethology and epidemiology of canine aggression. In: Serpell, J (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People pp 131138. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Marder, AR 2009 Are pit bulls different? Talk presented at the Interdisciplinary Forum on Applied Animal Behavior, Thirteenth Annual Meeting. 28 February 2009, Tucson, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J 1982 Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClay, M 2009 Fighting Dogs. ourpack.org/fightingdogs/htmlGoogle Scholar
Miklósi, A 2007 Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millman, ST and Duncan, IJH 2000a Strain differences in aggressiveness of male domestic fowl in response to a male model. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 217233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millman, ST and Duncan, IJH 2000b Effect of male-to-male aggressiveness and feed-restriction during rearing on sexual behaviour and aggressiveness towards females by male domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 6382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogil, JS, Wilson, SG, Bon, K, Lee, SE, Chung, K, Raber, P, Pieper, JO, Hain, HS, Belknap, JK, Hubert, L, Elmer, GI, Chung, JM, and Devor, M 1999 Heritability of nociception I: responses of 11 inbred mouse strains on 12 measures of nociception. Pain 80: 6782Google ScholarPubMed
Moody, JA, Clark, LA and Murphy, KE 2006 Working dogs: History and applications. In: Ostrander, EA, Giger, U and Lindblad-Toh, L (eds) The Dog and Its Genome pp 118. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Parker, GA 1974 Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 47: 223243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, HG, Sutter, NB and Ostrander, EA 2006 Understanding genetic relationships among purebred dogs: The PhyDo Project. In: Ostrander, EA, Giger, U and Lindblad-Toh, L (eds) The Dog and Its Genome pp 141157. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Pit Bull Owners Alliance 2009 Code of Ethics for Breeders of American Pit Bull Terriers/American Staffordshire Terriers. www.real-pitbull.com/bcoe.htmlGoogle Scholar
Popova, NK, Nikulina, EM and Kulikov, AV 1993 Genetic analysis of different kinds of aggressive behavior. Behavior Genetics 23: 491497CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, EO 1984 Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Quarterly Review of Biology 59: 132Google Scholar
Price, TD and Gebauer, AB 1995 Last Hunters, First Farmers. New Perspectives on the Prehistoric Transition to Agriculture. School of American Research Press: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USAGoogle Scholar
Sablin, MV and Khlopachev, GA 2002 The earliest ice age dogs: evidence from Eliseevichi 1. Current Anthropology 43: 795798Google Scholar
Savolainen, P, Zhang, YP, Luo, J, Lundeberg, J and Leitner, T 2002 Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298: 16101613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, JP and Fuller, JL 1965 Genetics and the Social Behavior of the Dog. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, JW 1992 Wild Dogs: The Natural History of the Nondomestic Canidae. The Blackburn Press: Caldwell, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L, Merck, M and Lockwood, R 2006 Forensic Investigation of Animal Cruelty: A Guide for Veterinary and Law Enforcement Professionals. Humane Society Press: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Spady, TC and Ostrander, EA 2008 Canine behavioral genetics: Pointing out the phenotypes and herding up the genes. American Journal of Human Genetics 82: 1018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahlkuppe, J 2000 The American Pit Bull Terrier Handbook. Barron's: Hauppaugre, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Stratton, RF 1991 The Truth About the American Pit Bull Terrier. TFH Publications, Inc: Neptune City, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Svartberg, K 2006 Breed-typical behaviour in dogs — Historical remnants or recent constructs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 293313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svartberg, K and Forkman, B 2002 Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 133155Google Scholar
Trut, LN 1999 Early canid domestication. The Farm-Fox Experiment. American Scientist 87: 161169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valkenburgh, B 1989 Carnivore dental adaptations and diet: A study of trophic diversity within guilds. In: Gittleman, JL (ed) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution pp 410436. Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, P, Iwamoto, I and Murakami, N 2006 Differences in aggression between wild-type and domesticated fighting fish are context dependent. Animal Behaviour 73: 7583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vila, C, Savolainen, P, Maldonado, JE, Amorim, IR, Rice, JE, Honeycutt, RL, Crandall, KA, Lundeberg, J and Wayne, RK 1997 Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science 276: 16871689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voith, VL, Ingram, E, Mitsouras, K and Irizarry, K 2009 Comparison of adoption agency breed identification and DNA breed identification of dogs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12: 253262Google ScholarPubMed
Willis, MB 1989 Genetics of the Dog. Howell Book House: Hoboken, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Willis, MB 1995 Genetic aspects of dog behaviour with particular reference to working ability. In: Serpell, J (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People pp 5164. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
WISDOM Panel™ 2007 Analysis Summary. Mars Inc: Lincoln, Nebraska, USAGoogle Scholar