Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T22:28:12.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A scoping review of freight rail noise and vibration impacts on domestic animal health and welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Trigg ,
A Naweed  and
S Kinnear
J Trigg*
Affiliation:
Appleton Institute, CQUniversity, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
A Naweed
Affiliation:
Appleton Institute, CQUniversity, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
S Kinnear
Affiliation:
CQUniversity, 554-700 Yaamba Road, Norman Gardens, QLD 4701, Australia
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Multiple benefits of freight rail activity have been shown for commercial agribusiness, yet the effects of freight rail-related noise and vibration on domestic livestock health and welfare has so far received little research attention. This scoping review examines peer-reviewed and grey literature addressing associations between freight rail noise, vibration and impacts on domestic livestock. Six databases (Scopus, Science Direct, SAGE, TRID, SPARK, ARRB) were searched for relevant literature published from 1980–2019. PRISMA search procedures were used to identify 28 publications relevant to domestic livestock, as well as noise or vibration impact of rail applicable to the freight rail context. Included publications addressed a range of livestock and related species, covering descriptive, review, and experimental findings on noise and vibration impacts. Five publications addressed vibration effects, and 23 addressed noise effects. Effects of noise and vibration on different species indicated that adverse effects vary depending on exposure intensity. The literature indicates that specific thresholds for noise and vibration exposure should be considered when managing freight rail impacts on commercial agribusiness involving avian and mammalian species. Freight rail noise and vibration likely exceeds thresholds for discomfort and harm for avian and mammalian species. Future research should consider case studies that specifically focus on integrating freight rail noise and vibration data to derive species-specific guides for animal health and welfare purposes.

Keywords

animal welfarelivestocknoiserailtransport infrastructurevibration
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
© 2022 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abeyesinghe, SM, Nicol, CJ, Wathes, CM and Randall, JM 2001 Development of a raceway method to assess aversion of domestic fowl to concurrent stressors. Behavioural Processes 56: 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00193-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aradom, S 2012 Animal Transport and Welfare with special emphasis on Transport Time and Vibration including Logistics Chain and Abattoir operations. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Archer, N 2014 Noise and vibration impact assessment (630.10155.00300-R3). SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd: NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Armas, NM 2004 Military aviation noise and its effects on domesticated and wild animals. Penn State Environmental Law Review 12: 367–388Google Scholar
Arnold, NA, Ng, KT, Jongman, EC and Hemsworth, PH 2008 Avoidance of tape-recorded milking facility noise by dairy heifers in a Y maze choice task. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asaff, Y, Fiorentin, TA and Braz, L 2019 Noise characterization of a freight railroad in Brazil. 12th World Congress on Railway Research. 28 October to 1 November 2019, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
Atigui, M, Marnet, P-G, Ayeb, N, Khorchani, T and Hammadi, M 2014 Effect of changes in milking routine on milking related behaviour and milk removal in Tunisian dairy dromedary camels. Journal of Dairy Research 81: 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002202991400051XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baghli, A and Thiévent, P 2011 OptiFlux: when biological and spatial data are crossed to reduce effects of linear infrastructure on wildlife. Procedia Environmental Sciences 9: 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, R, Ascensão, F, Beja, P, Pereira, HM and Borda-de-Água, L 2019 Railway ecology vs road ecology: similarities and differences. European Journal of Wildlife Research 65: 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1248-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, T, Bertoia, T, Greaves, S and Stopher, P 2006 The costs of infill versus greenfield development – A review of recent literature. 29th Australasian Transport Research Forum. 27–29 September 2006. Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Brito Garcia, D, José Oliveira Silva, I, Antônio Delfino Barbosa Filho, J, Márcio Correa Vieira, F and Tadeu dos Santos Dias, C 2008 Evaluation of the effect of vibration in sim-ulated condition of transport of broiler chickens. Livestock Environment VIII. 31 August–4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, BrazilGoogle Scholar
Brouč ek, J 2014 Effect of noise on performance, stress, and behaviour of animals. Slovak Journal of Animal Science 47: 111–123Google Scholar
Brozoski, T, Wisner, K, Randall, M and Caspary, D 2019 Chronic sound-induced tinnitus and auditory attention in animals. Neuroscience 407: 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campo, JL, Gil, MG and Dávila, SG 2005 Effects of specific noise and music stimuli on stress and fear levels of laying hens of several breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91: 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carenzi, C and Verga, M 2009 Animal welfare: review of the sci-entific concept and definition. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8: 21–30. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, DP, Marecki, GP, Kouroussis, G, Thalassinakis, I and Woodward, PK 2016 The growth of railway ground vibration problems—A review. Science of the Total Environment 568: 1276–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.101Google ScholarPubMed
Cornish, A, Raubenheimer, D and McGreevy, P 2016 What we know about the public's level of concern for farm animal wel-fare in food production in developed countries. Animals 6: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6110074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deylam, MJ, Gheraat, MA, Naghdi, N and Abarghani, LE 2011 Impairment of spatial performance by continuous intensive noise: a behavioral view. Psychology & Neuroscience 4: 309–315. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2011.3.003Google Scholar
Di, G and He, L 2013 Behavioral and plasma monoamine responses to high-speed railway noise stress in mice. Noise and Health 15: 217–233. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.113506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di, G and Zheng, Y 2013 Effects of high-speed railway noise on the synaptic ultrastructure and phosphorylated-CaMKII expression in the central nervous system of SD rats. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 35: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2012.11.012Google ScholarPubMed
Doggett, F and San Souci, S 2018 Animal stress due to noise and vibration. NOISE Theory and Practice 4: 5–9Google Scholar
Dooling, RJ 2004 Estimating effects of highway noise on the avian auditory system. 2005 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation (ICOET 2005). 29 August–5 September 2005, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
Edwards-Callaway, LN and Calvo-Lorenzo, MS 2020 Animal welfare in the US slaughter industry—a focus on fed cattle. Journal of Animal Science 98. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellram, LM and Ueltschy Murfield, ML 2017 Environmental sustainability in freight transportation: A systematic literature review and agenda for future research. Transportation Journal 56: 263–298. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.56.3.0263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebresenbet, G, Aradom, S, Bulitta, FS and Hjerpe, E 2011 Vibration levels and frequencies on vehicle and animals during transport. Biosystems Engineering 110: 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, RI 2006 Multivariate behavioural response of harlequin ducks to aircraft disturbance in Labrador. Environmental Conservation 33: 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892906002724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudie, RI and Jones, IL 2004 Dose-response relationships of harlequin duck behaviour to noise from low-level military jet over-flights in central Labrador. Environmental Conservation 31: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1989 Behavioral principles of livestock handling. The Professional Animal Scientist 5: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)32304-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandin, T 1998 Handling methods and facilities to reduce stress on cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 14: 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30257-7Google ScholarPubMed
Guignard, JC 1971 Human sensitivity to vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration 15: 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(71)90354-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J, MacPherson, J and Popoff-Asotoff, P 2012 Further investigations of low-frequency noise problem generated by freight trains. Proceedings of Acoustics 2012. 21–23 November 2012, Fremantle, WA, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Haas, P and Scrivener, A 2015 High-speed rail and equine issues (CA-MTI-15-1427). Mineta Transportation Institute: San Jose, CA, USA. https://transweb.sjsu.edu/sites/default/files/1427-high-speed-rail-and-equine-issues.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hampton, JO, Jones, B and McGreevy, PD 2020 Social license and animal welfare: Developments from the past decade in Australia. Animals 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122237Google Scholar
Hanemann, JM and Maddock, P 2018 Between the wheel and the track: A regulator's reflections on rail noise regulation in NSW. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Railway Noise. 12-16 September 2016, Terrigal, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Hanson, CE 2008 High-speed train noise effects on wildlife and domestic livestock. In: Schulte-Werning, B, Thompson, D, Gautier, P-E, Hanson, C, Hemsworth, B, Nelson, J, Maeda, T and de Vos, P (eds) Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems pp 26–32. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74893-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, CE, Ross, JC and Towers, DA 2012 High-speed ground transportation noise and vibration impact assessment. US Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC, USA. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26225/dot_26225_DS1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hardy, AEJ 2004 Audibility of warning horns: Final report (AEATR-PC&E-2004-002). Rail Safety and Standards Board: Derby, UKGoogle Scholar
Haverbeke, A, Diederich, C, Depiereux, E and Giffroy, JM 2008 Cortisol and behavioral responses of working dogs to envi-ronmental challenges. Physiology & Behavior 93: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.014Google Scholar
Hemsworth, B 2008 Environmental noise directive development of action plans for railways. International Union of Railways: Paris, France. https://uic.org/IMG/pdf/action_planning_paper_final-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
IAC Accoustics (IAC) 2019 Comparative examples of noise levels. https://www.iacacoustics.com/blog-full/comparative-examples-of-noise-levels.htmlGoogle Scholar
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR) 2020 Railway noise and vibration. https://www.southampton.ac.uk/engineering/research/groups/dynamics/rail/noise_vibration_overview.pageGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency 2019 The future of rail: Opportunities for energy and the environment. International Energy Agency: FranceGoogle Scholar
International Union of Railways and De Vos, P 2017 Railway induced vibration - State of the art report. International Union of Railways: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Kajzer-Bonk, J, Skórka, P, Bonk, M, Lenda, M, Roż ej-Pabijan, E, Wantuch, M and Moroń, D 2019 The effect of railways on bird diversity in farmland. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26: 31086–31098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06245-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KPMG 2018 Talking 2030: Growing agriculture into a $100 billion industry. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/au/pdf/2018/talking-2030-growing-australian-agriculture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lanier, JL 2008 Stress, fear, and standard livestock husbandry pro-cedures. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria 9: 1695–7504. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/636/63617111014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Manci, KM, Gladwin, DN, Villella, R and Cavendish, M 1988 Effects of aircraft noise and sonic booms on domestic animals and wildlife: A literature synthesis (NERC-88-29). US Department of the Interior: Washington, DC, USA.https://www.fs.fed.us/eng/techdev/IM/sound_measure/Manci_et_al _1988.pdfGoogle Scholar
McAdie, TM, Foster, TM, Temple, W and Matthews, LR 1993 A method for measuring the aversiveness of sounds to domestic hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90113-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Australia 2020 State of the Industry Report: The Australian Red Meat and Livestock Industry 2020. Meat and Livestock Australia: North Sydney, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Mestre, V 2008 Effects of aircraft noise: Research update on selected topics. Transportation Research Board: Laguna Niguel, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J and Altman, DG 2009 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analy-ses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD/FAO 2019 OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028. OECD/FAO: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Owen, D 2017 High speed 2 limited, phase one: Noise effects on livestock (236118-57/R01- Issue 2). Ove Arup & Partners Ltd: London UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/u ploads/attachment_data/file/590162/Noise_Effects_on_Livestock.pdfGoogle Scholar
Randall, JM, Duggan, JA, Alami, MA and White, RP 1997 Frequency weightings for the aversion of broiler chickens to hor-izontal and vertical vibration. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 68: 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M, Fryer, C and Phillips, CJC 2019 The benefits of improving animal welfare from the perspective of livestock stake-holders across Asia. Animals 9: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040123Google Scholar
Thompson, K, McGreevy, P and McManus, P 2015 A critical review of horse-related risk: A research agenda for safer mounts, riders and equestrian cultures. Animals 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5030372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, J, Morgan, C, Rutter, A and Lee, D 2019 Use of rail in oil and gas regions of Texas to reduce truck impacts. ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference 2019. Snowbird, Utah, USA. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2019-1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, CA 2008 A review of welfare in cattle, sheep and pig lairages, with emphasis on stocking rates, ventilation and noise. Animal Welfare 17: 275–284.Google Scholar
Wiseman, L and Sanderson, J 2019 Farms create lots of data, but farmers don't control where it ends up and who can use it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/farms-create-lots-of-data-but-farmers-dont-control-where-it-ends-up-and-who-can-use-it-115228Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Trigg et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 395.6 KB