Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:50:42.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of population control methods in captive-housed primates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

PY Wallace ,
CS Asa ,
M Agnew  and
SM Cheyne
PY Wallace*
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
CS Asa
Affiliation:
AZA Wildlife Contraception Center, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
M Agnew
Affiliation:
AZA Wildlife Contraception Center, Saint Louis Zoo, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
SM Cheyne
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Gipsy Lane, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The success of breeding primates in captivity has led to a surplus number of animals in collections. This review examines published journals and key books to investigate the various methods of primate population control. Hormonal, surgical and separation methods are discussed and evaluated with regards to behavioural and welfare implications. Methods of dealing with surplus animals are also reviewed. It is concluded that the successes of contraception methods vary significantly between species, and in some cases not enough is known to conclusively state that one method is preferable to another. The behavioural effects of contraception should be evaluated, as social status and sexual behaviours can be negatively affected by contraception. Non-reversible sterilisation methods, such as castration, should not be used without thorough evaluation due to the behavioural effects on the individual and group as a whole. Overall, the zoo community should share information of successes and failures of contraception in different species, and professional advice should be sought to ensure that the welfare of primates in captivity is not compromised.

Keywords

animal welfarecontraceptioneuthanasiapopulation managementprimatessurplus stock
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 7 - 20
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alberts, SC, Altmann, J, Brockman, DK, Cords, M, Fedigan, LM, Pusey, A, Stoinski, TS, Strier, KB, Morris, WF and Bronikowski, AM 2013 Reproductive aging patterns in primates reveal that humans are distinct. PNAS 110(33): 13440–13445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1311857110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Animal Welfare Act 2006 Animal Welfare Act. HMSO: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Asa, C 1997 The development of contraceptive methods for captive wildlife. In: Kreeger, TJ (ed) Contraception in Wildlife Management pp 235–240. Technical Bulletin 1853. US Dept of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Asa, C 2005 Contraception choices. In: Asa, CS and Porton, IJ (eds) Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods and Applications pp 66–82. The John Hopkins University Press: Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Asa, CS, Porton, IJ and Junge, R 2007 Contraception of black lemurs (Eulemur macaco macaco) with Depo-Provera during the breeding sea-son. Zoo Biology 26: 289–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balena, R, Toolan, BC, Shea, M, Markatos, A, Myers, ER, Lee, SC, Opas, EE, Seedor, JG, Klein, H, Frankenfield, D, Quartuccio, H, Fioravanti, C, Clair, J, Brown, E, Hayes, WC and Rodan, GA 1993 The effects of 2-year treatment with the aminobiophosphonate alendronate on the bone metabolism, bone histomorphometry and bone strength in ovariectomized nonhu-man primates. Journal of Clinical Investigation 92: 2577–2586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI116872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L, Gaynor, D and Henzi, SP 2002 A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons. Animal Behaviour 63: 1047–1053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2002.3008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellino, FL and Wise, PM 2003 Non human primate models of menopause workshop. Biology of Reproduction 68: 10–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.005215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourry, O, Peignot, P and Rouquet, P 2005 Contraception in the chimpanzee: 12-year experience at the CIRMF Primate Centre, Gabon. Journal of Medical Primatology 34: 25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2004.00088.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkart, JM and van Schaik, CP 2010 Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Animal Cognition 31(1): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0263-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casares, M, Recuero, J and Fernandez-Hoyo, G 2011 Talapoin monkeys Miopithecus spp in European zoos: status and management in mixed species exhibits. International Zoo Yearbook 45: 226–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1090.2010.00119.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavigalli, SA and Pereira, ME 2000 Mating season aggression and fecal testosterone levels in male ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Hormones and Behaviour 37: 246–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/hbeh.2000.1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, CL, Savage, A and Bromley, LJ 1992 Phylogenetic influ-ences on hormone levels across the primate order. American Journal of Primatology 28: 81–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350280202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defra 2010 Code of practice for the welfare of privately kept non-human primates. DEFRA: London, UKGoogle Scholar
DeMatteo, KE, Porton, IJ and Asa, CS 2002 Comments from the AZA contraception advisory group on evaluating the suitabil-ity of contraceptive methods on golden-lion headed tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) Animal Welfare 11: 343–348Google Scholar
De Vleeschouwer, K, Leus, K and Van Elsacker, L 2000 An evaluation of the suitability of contraceptive methods in golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas), with emphasis on melengestrol acetate (mga) implants: (i) effectiveness, reversibility and medical side-effects. Animal Welfare 9: 251–271Google Scholar
DeWaal, FBM 1987 Tension regulation and nonreproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). National Geographic Research 3(3): 318-335Google Scholar
Dixon, AF and Herbert, J 1977 Gonadal hormones and sexual behavior in groups of adult talapoin monkeys (Miopithicus talapoin). Hormones and Behaviour 8: 141–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(77)90031-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dröscher, I and Waitt, CD 2012 Social housing of surplus males of Javan langurs (Trachypithecus auratus): Compatibility of intact and castrated males in different social settings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 141: 184–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2012.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, B, Williams-Blangero, S, Mamelka, P and Goodwin, W 1995 Future costs of chimpanzees in US research institutions. ILAR Journal 37(4): 193–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ilar.37.4.193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egbetade, AO, Gadsby, EL, Idoiaga, A and Jenkins, PD 2014 Vasectomy in drill monkeys (Mandrillus leucophaeus) – A population management tool. World Journal of Zoology 9(2): 107–110Google Scholar
EGZAC 2014 About us. Available at: http://www.egzac.org/abou-tus.aspxGoogle Scholar
Glatston, AR 1998 The control of zoo populations with special reference to primates. Animal Welfare 7: 269–281Google Scholar
Graham, S 1996 Issues of surplus animals. In: Kleiman, D, Allen, M, Thompson, K and Lumpkin, S (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques pp 290–296. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Gray, ME and Cameron, EZ 2010 Does contraceptive treat-ment in wildlife result in side effects? A review of quantitative and anecdotal evidence. Reproduction 139: 45–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustison, ML, MacLarnon, A, Wiper, S and Semple, S 2012 An experimental study of behavioural coping strategies in free-ranging female Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Stress 15:608–617. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2012.668589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, AJ, Schuerch, FS, Heffernan, S, Thomson, PC, O’Brien, JK and McGreevy, PD 2008 The effect of medroxyproges-terone acetate on behavioural responses of captive female hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Animal Reproduction Science 108: 412–424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.09.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, K, Boesch, C, Goodall, J, Pusey, A, Williams, J and Wrangham, R 2001 Mortality rates among wild chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution 40: 437–450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0469CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosey, G, Melfi, V and Pankhurst, S 2009 Zoo Animals: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, JF and Turner, JW 1991 Reversible contraception in nondomestic animals. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 22(4): 392–408Google Scholar
Labrie, C, Cusan, L, Plante, M, Lapointe, S and Labrie, F 1987 Analysis of the androgenic activity of synthetic ‘progestins’ currently used for the treatment of prostate cancer. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry 28: 379–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4731(87)91054-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, RC 1995 Culling surplus animals for population manage-ment. In: Norton, B, Maple, T and Hutchins, M (eds) Ethics on the Ark: Conservation and Animal Welfare pp 187–194. Smithsonian Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Leong, KM, Terrell, SP and Savage, A 2004 Causes of mortal-ity in captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedupus). Zoo Biology 23: 127–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, GS and Steklis, HD 1990 The effects of depo-medrox-yprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on copulation-related and agonis-tic behaviors in an island colony of stumptail macaques (Macaca arctoides). Physiology and Behavior 47: 403–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(90)90100-ICrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallapur, A and Choudhury, BC 2003 Behavioural abnormali-ties in captive nonhuman primates. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6(4): 275–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0604_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, SW, Atsalis, S, Bellem, A and Wielebnowski, N 2007 Assessment of reproductive behaviour and hormonal cycles in geriatric western lowland gorillas. Zoo Biology 26: 117–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, KN and Tromborg, CT 2007 Sources of stress in cap-tivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 262–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munson, L, Moresco, A and Calle, PP 2005 Adverse effects of contraceptives. In: Asa, CS and Porton, IJ (eds) Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods and Applications pp 66–82. The John Hopkins University Press: Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Paterson, M and Aitken, R 1990 Development of vaccines tar-geting the zona pellucida. Current Opinion in Immunology 2: 723–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0952-7915(90)90043-GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfold, LM, Powell, D, Traylor-Holzer, K and Asa, CS 2014 ‘Use it or lose it’: Characterization, implications, and mitigation of female infertility in captive wildlife. Zoo Biology 33: 20–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowman, A, Jordan, NR, Anderson, N, Condon, E and Fraser, O 2004 Welfare implications of captive primate population management: behavioural and psycho-social effects of female-based contraception, oestrus and male removal in hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90(2): 155–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porton, IJ and DeMatteo, KE 2005 Contraception in nonhuman primates. In: Asa, CS and Porton, IJ (eds) Wildlife Contraception: Issues, Methods and Applications pp 66–82. The John Hopkins University Press: Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Portugal, MM and Asa, CS 1995 Effects of chronic melengestrol acetate contraceptive on tumescence, body weight, and sociosex-ual behaviour of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas). Zoo Biology 14: 251–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430140306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralls, K and Ballou, J 1982 Effects of inbreeding on infant mor-tality in captive primates. International Journal of Primatology 3(4): 491–505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02693747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, H, Hill, DA and Furuichi, T 2015 Prolonged maximal sex-ual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females Behaviour 152: 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, AW 1997 The humane control of captive marmoset and tamarin populations. Animal Welfare 6: 231–242Google Scholar
Shively, CA, Kaplan, JR and Adams, MR 1986 Effects of ovariectomy, social instability and social status on female Macaca fascicularis social behaviour. Physiology and Behavior 36(6): 1147–1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(86)90492-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silber, SJ 1977 Sperm granuloma and reversibility of vasectomy. Lancet 2: 588–589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(77)91432-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silber, SJ 1978 Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal. Fertility and Sterility 29: 125–140Google ScholarPubMed
Silber, SJ and Grotjan, HE 2004 Microscopic vasectomy rever-sal 30 years later: A summary of 4010 cases by the same surgeon. Journal of Andrology 25: 845–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steklis, HD, Linn, GS, Howard, SM, Kling, AS and Tiger, L 1982 Effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on socio-sexual behavior in stumptail macaques. Physiology and Behaviour 28: 535–544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(82)90152-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straub, SG, Sharp, GW, Meglasson, MD and De Souza, CJ 2001 Progesterone inhibits insulin secretion by a membrane delimited, non-genomic action. Bioscience Reports 21: 653–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014773010350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temmerman, M, Cammu, H, Devroey, P and Amy, JJ 1986 Evaluation of one-hundred open-ended vasectomies. Contraception 33(6): 529–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(86)90040-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terry, RL 1970 Primate grooming as a tension reduction mech-anism. The Journal of Psychology 76: 129–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1970.9916830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, CL 2001 Role of hormonal and reproductive factors in the etiology and treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Recent Progress in Hormone Research 57: 277–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/rp.57.1.277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Water, SS, Quinton, N and Webster, D 2001 Aspects of lan-gur reproduction and management at Bristol Zoo. International Zoo News 48/3: 308 http://www.zoonews.co.uk/IZN/308/IZN-308.htmlGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, CJ, Savage, A, Shukla, A, Neiffer, D, Qu, W, Sun, Y and Lasley, BL 2011 The use of long acting subcutaneous lev-onorgestrel (LNG) gel depot as an effective contraceptive option for cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Zoo Biology 30: 498–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, LE and Abee, CR 2005 Aggression with mixed age-sex groups of Bolivian squirrel monkeys following single animal introductions and new group formations. Zoo Biology 7(2): 139–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430070207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C, Ballou, J and Houle, CS 2001 Restoration of reproductive potential following expiration or removal of Menengestrol Acetate con-traceptive implants of golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 32(4): 417–425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2001)032[0417:RORPFE]2.0.CO;2Google ScholarPubMed
Wright, PC 1997 Behavioural and ecological comparisons of neotropical and Malagasy primates. In: Kinzey, WG (ed) New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution and Behavior pp 127–141. Walter de Gruyter Inc: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wallace et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 89.5 KB