Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:13:49.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rearing Pigs in Species-Specific Family Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B Wechsler
B Wechsler*
Affiliation:
Abt. Sozial- und Nutztierethologie, Zoologisches Institut, Universität Bern, Ethologische Station Hasli, Wohlenstrasse 50a, 3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Family Pen System piglets and fatteners grow up in species-specific family groups that correspond to the normal social organization of domestic pigs. The feasibility of a technologically improved version of this alternative housing system, originally designed by Alex Stolba, was tested on a commercial farm for two and a half years. Eighty-one litters were born in three family groups within this period. Average cycle length was 170 ± 24 (SD) days, resulting in 2.15 litters per sow per year. All piglets were suckled for at least seven weeks. In 53.8 per cent of the cycles lactational oestrus occurred before the piglets were seven-weeks-old. The litters of sows which did not show lactational oestrus were artificially weaned and returned to the family group as soon as the sow had been served. At the beginning there were problems with piglet health and crushing, but in the last 21 months of the study there was a stable reproductive performance of 19.5 piglets (28-days-old) reared per sow per year (n = 53 litters). Sows that had been raised themselves in the Family Pen System reared 21.4 piglets per year (n = 25 litters). In conclusion, the technologically improved version of the Family Pen System was found to be practicable on a commercial farm.

Keywords

animal welfarelactational oestruspen designpig housing
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1996 , pp. 25 - 35
Copyright
© 1996 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Dybkjær, L 1992 The identification of behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ in early weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1986 Observations on the maternal behaviour of free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1989 Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P and Recén, B 1989 When to wean - Observations from free-ranging domestic pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, S G C, Wood-Gush, D G M, Moser, H and Whittemore, CT 1988 Enrichment of the production environment and the enhancement of welfare through the use of the Edinburgh Family Pen System of pig production. Research and Development in Agriculture 5: 171–186Google Scholar
Kleinviehzucht 1993 Jahresbericht 1992 der Schweizerischen Zentralstelle für Kleinviehzucht. Der Kleinviehzüchter 7: 361–404Google Scholar
Mollet, P und Wechsler, B 1991 Auslösende Reize für das Koten und Harnen bei Hausschweinen. In: Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung 1990, KTBL-Schrift 344 pp 150–161. Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft: Darmstadt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H 1993 Ethological design of a practicable farrowing pen. In: Nichelmann, M, Wierenga, H K and Braun, S (eds) Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, Berlin pp 238–242. Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft: Darmstadt, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S 1956 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences p 312. McGraw-Hill: Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A 1981 A family system in enriched pens as a novel method of pig housing. In: Alternatives to Intensive Husbandry Systems. Proceedings of a Symposium held at Wye College pp 52-67. The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A 1986 Ansatz zu einer artgerechten Schweinehaltung: Der “möblierte Familienstall”. In: Sambraus, H H und Boehncke, E (eds) Ökologische Tierhaltung pp 148–166. Müller: Karlsruhe, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, D G M 1984 The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annales de Recherches Véterinaires 15: 287–298Google ScholarPubMed
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, D G M 1989 The behaviour of pigs in a seminatural environment. Animal Production 48: 419–425Google Scholar
Wechsler, B, Schmid, H und Moser, H 1991 Der Stolba-Familienstall für Hausschweine: ein tiergerechtes Haltungssystem für Zucht- und Mastschweine p 95. Birkhäuser: Basel, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar