Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:29:36.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protective behaviour of Konik horses in response to insect harassment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

A Górecka  and
T Jezierski
A Górecka
Affiliation:
Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Department of Animal Behaviour, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Wólka Kosowska, Poland
T Jezierski*
Affiliation:
Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Department of Animal Behaviour, Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Wólka Kosowska, Poland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The natural protective behaviour displayed by Konik Polski horses against flies was investigated. The factors considered were age (adults versus foals), management system (forest reserve versus pasture), weather conditions and type of horse activity. Twenty-five Konik Polski adults and 18 foals were observed between 0800 and 2000h during two summer seasons (2000 and 2001). Individual protective behaviours (IB) eg tail swishing, head shaking, leg lifting, skin twitching and social protective behaviour (grouping for mutual protection) against insects were studied. Adult and forest-kept horses performed more IB than foals and pastured horses, respectively. Wet and windy weather conditions significantly reduced insect harassment and the frequency of responses to insects. Therefore, if it is not possible to apply chemical repellents against insects, then allowing horses to aggregate into groups or providing them with refuge, especially on hot and windless days, may have significant welfare benefits.

Keywords

animal welfareforest reservehorseinsect harassmentpastureprotective behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 281 - 283
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Block, E and Levis, DJ 1986 Efficacy of insecticidal ear tags on fly control and milk production of dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66: 47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derouen, SM, Foil, LD, Knox, JW and Turpin, JM 1995 Horn Fly (Diptera: Muscidae) Control and Weight Gains of Yearling Beef Cattle. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 666–668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, CT, Knapp, FW, Burrus, PB, Willis, DC and Bradley, NW 1993a Face flies (Musca autumnalis De Geer) and the behaviour of grazing beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, CT, Knapp, FW, Burrus, PB, Willis, DC, Burg, JG, Cornelius, PL and Bradley, NW 1993b Stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans L) and the behaviour of grazing beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, P and Vigne, N 1979 The Effect of Group Size in Horses on the Rate of Attacs by Blood-Sucking Flies. Reprint No 44 from Animal Behaviour 27: 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epsmark, Y and Langvatn, R 1979 Lying down as a means of reducing fly harassment in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5: 51–54Google Scholar
Greiner, EC 1995 Entomologic Evaluation of Insect Hypersensitivity in Horses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 11: 29–41Google ScholarPubMed
Keiper, RR and Berger, J 1982 Refuge-seeking and pest avoidance by feral horses in desert and island environments. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojola, I 1991 Reproductive status and differential response to attacking insects in female reindeer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 91–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutberg, AT 1987 Horse Fly Harassment and the Social Behavior of Feral Ponies. Ethology 75: 145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickman, D, Wirtz, R, Lawyer, P, Glick, J, Stockwell, S and Perich, M 1995 Meteorological effects on the biting activity of Leptoconops americanus(Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 11: 15–20Google ScholarPubMed
Wollard, TH and Bullock, DJ 1987 Effects of Headfly (Hydrotaea irritans Fallen) Infestation and Repellents on Ear-Flicking and Head-Shaking Behavior in Farmed Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar