Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T20:23:30.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Evaluation of Environmental Enrichment Techniques for African Lions (Panthera leo)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D M Powell
D M Powell*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-4415
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study was conducted over 24 days to evaluate the effects of three environmental enrichment techniques (frozen balls of ice containing fish, various scents, hanging logs) on four captive African lions (Panthera leo). Behavioural data on activity level and behavioural diversity were collected daily during a baseline and an enriched session. All enrichments produced positive changes in behaviour. Enrichment was also associated with increased use of space by the lions. The enrichment techniques evaluated in this study each produced distinct and positive changes in behaviour thus reinforcing the need for variety to be exercised in captive enrichment programmes. Providing different enrichments allows animals to perform a greater range of behaviours, become more active in captivity, and will decrease the likelihood of habituation to certain enrichment items. Environmental enrichment should be a part of any management protocol for animal welfare and health.

Keywords

African lionanimal welfareenvironmental enrichment
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 361 - 370
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behavior. Behaviour 49: 226–267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budavari, S 1989 The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals, 11th edition. Merck & Co: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Seidensticker, J and Baldwin, R 1991 Environmental enrichment for zoo bears. Zoo Biology 10: 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K and Shepherdson, D 1994 Effects of environmental enrichment on reproduction. Zoo Biology 13: 447–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, M 1955 A statistical formula to quantify the spread of participation in group discussion. Speech Monographs 22: 28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forthman, D L, Elder, S D, Bakeman, R, Kurkowski, T W, Noble, C C and Winslow, S W 1992 Effects of feeding enrichment on behavior of three species of captive bears. Zoo Biology 11: 187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forthman-Quick, D L 1984 An integrative approach to environmental engineering in zoos. Zoo Biology 3: 65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancocks, D 1980 Bringing nature into the zoo: inexpensive solutions for zoo environments. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 1: 170–177Google Scholar
Hediger, H 1950 Wild Animals in Captivity: An Outline of the Biology of Zoological Gardens. Dover Publications: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Hediger, H 1966 Diet of animals in captivity. International Zoo Yearbook 6: 37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, M and Wolfe, D A 1973 Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, M, Hancocks, D and Crockett, C 1983 Naturalistic solutions to the behavioral problems of zoo animals. Der Zoologische Garten 53: 1–15Google Scholar
Kruuk, H and Turner, M 1967 Comparative notes on predation by lion, leopard, cheetah, and wild dog in the Serengeti area, East Africa. Mammalia 31: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindburg, D G 1988 Improving the feeding of captive felines through application of field data. Zoo Biology 7: 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markowitz, H 1978 Engineering environments for behavioral opportunity in the zoo. Behavior Analyst 2: 34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellen, J D, Stevens, V J and Markowitz, H 1981 Environmental enrichment for servals, Indian elephants, and Canadian otters at Washington Park Zoo, Portland. International Zoo Yearbook 21: 196–201Google Scholar
Morris, D 1962 Occupational therapy for captive animals. In: Laboratory Animals Centre - Collected Papers Volume 11 (The Environment of Laboratory Animals) pp 37–42. Laboratory Animal Centre: Carshalton, UKGoogle Scholar
Schaller, G B 1972 The Serengeti Lion. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Shepherdson, D J, Carlstead, K, Mellen, J D and Seidensticker, J 1993 The influence of food presentation on the behavior of small cats in confined environments. Zoo Biology 12: 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, R L 1975 Behavioral stress on captive animals. In: Research in Zoos and Aquariums pp 41–76. National Academy of Sciences: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar