Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:02:08.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Possibilities and Limitations of the Study of the Animal Mind

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J Van Rooijen*
Affiliation:
Churchillweg 37-c, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is my conviction that all animals, including invertebrates, possess a mind. This conviction is not based on scientific evidence. We are unable to observe the mind directly. According to the principle of parsimony, I assume that body and mind are two aspects of the same. This assumption predicts that it will always be possible to find a bodily explanation, implying that it will never be possible to perform an experiment that proves that a mind is present in any animal species, including human beings. As a result, it will never be possible to prove scientifically that my conviction that all animals possess a mind is correct or wrong.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Kennedy, J S 1992 The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooijen, J 1997 Suffering and well-being and the study of behaviour. In: Dol, M, Kasanmoentalib, S, Lijmbach, S, Rivas, E and Van den Bos, R (eds) Animal Consciousness and Animal Ethics: Perspectives from the Netherlands pp 114124. Van Gorcum: Assen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Visser, M B H and Grommers, F J 1988 Dier of Ding. Pudoc: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar