Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:28:01.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positive reinforcement training as enrichment for singly housed rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

KC Baker ,
MA Bloomsmith ,
K Neu ,
C Griffis  and
M Maloney
KC Baker*
Affiliation:
Division of Veterinary Medicine, Tulane National Primate Research Center, 18703 Three Rivers Road, Covington, Louisiana 70433, USA
MA Bloomsmith
Affiliation:
Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA
K Neu
Affiliation:
Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA
C Griffis
Affiliation:
Yerkes National Primate Research Center, 954 Gatewood Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA
M Maloney
Affiliation:
Disney's Animal Kingdom, 1200 Savannah Circle, Bay Lake, Florida 32830-1000, USA
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Positive reinforcement training is one component of behavioural management employed to improve psychological well-being. There has been regulatory promotion to compensate for restricted social housing in part by providing human interaction to singly caged primates, implying an efficacy standard for evaluating human interaction. The effect of positive reinforcement training on the behaviour of 61 singly housed laboratory rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) was evaluated at two large primate facilities. Training involved body part presentation and basic control behaviours. Baseline data were compared to two treatment phases presented in varying order across individuals, six minutes per week of positive reinforcement training and six minutes per week of unstructured human interaction. While a MANOVA involving behavioural categories and study conditions across study subjects was significant, univariate ANOVAs found no effect of phase within any behavioural category. Categorising subjects according to rearing, housing facility, or baseline levels of abnormal behaviour did not reveal changes in behaviour with positive reinforcement training or human interaction. This study failed to detect, to any degree, the types of behavioural changes documented in the scientific literature to result from pairing singly housed monkeys. Implementing short durations of positive reinforcement training across large numbers of singly housed animals may not be the most effective manner for incorporating positive reinforcement training in the behavioural management of laboratory macaques. Rather, directing efforts toward individuals with specific behavioural, management, clinical, research or therapeutic needs may represent a more fruitful approach to improving psychological well-being with this technique.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural managementhuman interactionlaboratory primatespositive reinforcement trainingsingle housing
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 307 - 313
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Baker, KC 2004 Benefits of positive human interaction for socially-housed chimpanzees. Animal Welfare 13: 239–245Google ScholarPubMed
Baker, KC, Bloomsmith, M, Neu, K, Griffis, C, Maloney, M, Oettinger, B, Schoof, V and Martinez, M 2009 Positive reinforcement training moderates only high levels of abnormal behavior in singly-housed rhesus macaques. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 12: 236–252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, KC, Weed, JL, Crockett, CC and Bloomsith, MA 2007 Survey of behavioral management programs for laboratory primates. American Journal of Primatology 69: 377–394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayne, KAL, Dexter, SL and Strange, MS 1993 The effects of food treat provisioning and human interaction on the behavioral well-being of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 32: 6–9Google Scholar
Bloomsmith, MA, Baker, KC, Ross, SK and Lambeth, SP 1999 Comparing animal training to non-training human interaction as environmental enrichment for chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 49: 35–36Google Scholar
Bloomsmith, MA, Laule, GE, Alford, PL and Thurston, RH 1994 Using training to moderate chimpanzee aggression during feeding. Zoo Biology 13: 557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomsmith, MA, Marr, MJ and Maple, TL 2007 Addressing nonhuman primate behavioral problems through the application of operant conditioning: Is the human treatment approach a useful model? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102: 205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomsmith, MA, Stone, AM and Laule, GE 1998 Positive reinforcement training to enhance the voluntary movement of group-housed chimpanzees within their enclosure. Zoo Biology 17: 333–3413.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, SR, Vazquez, M and Brasky, KM 2007 Combination therapy reduces self-injurious behavior in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes): a case report. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10: 123–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, JH and Maxwell, SE 1985 Multivariate Analysis of Variance. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, HE, Schapiro, SJ, Farah, I and Hau, J 2004 Use of primates in research: A global overview. American Journal of Primatology 63: 225–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clay, AW, Bloomsmith, MA, Marr, MJ and Maple, TL 2009 Comparing training methods to reduce fearful behavior in singly-housed rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 71: 30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, K and Maier, A 2010 The use of positive reinforcement training to reduce stereotypic behaviour in rhesus macaques. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124: 142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conlee, KM, Hoffeld, EH and Stephens, ML 2004 A demographic analysis of primate research in the United States. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 32(1A): 315–322CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, CC, Baker, KC, Bloomsmith, MA, Coleman, K, Fahey, MA, Lutz, CK, McCowan, BJ, Sullivan, J and Weed, JL 2008 Behavioral Management Consortium of the US National Primate Research Centers promotes communication, collaboration, and consensus. International Journal of Primatology (abstract)Google Scholar
Dorey, R, Rosales-Ruiz, J, Smith, R and Lovelace, B 2009 Functional analysis and treatment of self-injury in a captive olive baboon. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 42: 785–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, LA, Baker, KC and Cox, LD 2008 Physiological and behavioral effects of social introduction in adult male rhesus macaques. American Journal of Primatology 70: 542–550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaton, GE, Kelley, ST and Axthelm, MK 1994 Psychological well-being in paired adult female rhesus (Macaca mulatta). American Journal of Primatology 33: 89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahng, S, Iwata, BA and Lewin, AB 2002 Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1964 to 2000. American Journal of Mental Retardation 107: 212–2212.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koban, TL, Miyamoto, M, Donmoyer, G and Hammar, A 2005 Effects of positive reinforcement training on cortisol, hematology and cardiovascular parameters in cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology 66: 148Google Scholar
Lambeth, SP, Hau, J, Perlman, JE, Martino, M and Schapiro, SJ 2006 Positive reinforcement training affects hematologic and serum chemistry values in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology 68: 245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Line, SW, Morgan, KN, Markowitz, H, Roberts, JA and Riddell, M 1990 Behavioral responses of female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) to pair formation. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 29: 1–5Google Scholar
Maloney, MA, Baker, KC, Griffis, C, Neu, K, Bloomsmith, M and Martinez, M 2007 Behavioral responses by singly-housed adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) during positive reinforcement training and human interaction. American Journal of Primatology 69: 53Google Scholar
Martin, AL, Bloomsmith, MA, Clay, AW, Kelley, ME, Marr, MJ and Maple, TL 2007 The role of behavior analysis in the behavioral management of nonhuman primates. American Journal of Primatology 69: 119–120Google Scholar
Morgan, L, Howell, SM and Fritz, J 1993 Regurgitation and reingestion in a captive chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Laboratory Animal 22: 42–45Google Scholar
National Research Council 1996 Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Novak, MA and Sackett, GP 2006 The effects of rearing experiences: The early years. In: Sackett, GP, Ruppenthal, GC and Elias, K (eds) Nursery Rearing of Nonhuman Primates in the 21st Century pp 5–19. Springer: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, JK, Heffernan, S, Thomson, PC and McGreevy, PD 2008 Effect of positive reinforcement training on physiological and behavioural stress responses in the hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas). Animal Welfare 17: 125–138Google Scholar
Pomerantz, O and Terkel, J 2009 Effects of positive reinforcement training techniques on the psychological welfare of zoo-housed chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology 71: 687–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raper, JR, Bloomsmith, MA, Stone, A and Mayo, L 2002 Use of positive reinforcement training to decrease stereotypic behaviors in a pair of orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). American Journal of Primatology 57: 70–71Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1994 Survey of environmental enhancement for research macaques. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 33: 1–2Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V, Cowley, D, Scheffler, J, Vertein, R and Wegner, F 1990 Cortisol response of female rhesus monkeys to venipuncture in homecage versus venipuncture in restraint apparatus. Journal of Medical Primatology 19: 601–606CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V, Houser, D, Eisele, S, Cowley, D and Vertein, R 1988 Behavioral responses of unrelated rhesus monkey females paired for the purpose of environmental enrichment. American Journal of Primatology 14: 135–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schapiro, SJ, Bloomsmith, MA, Porter, LM and Suarez, SA 1996 Enrichment effects on rhesus monkeys successively housed singly, in pairs, and in groups. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suomi, SJ 2005 How gene-environment interactions shape biobehavioral development: Lessons from studies with rhesus monkeys. In: Stoff, DM and Susman, EJ (eds) Developmental Psychobiology of Aggression pp 252–268. Cambridge University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veeder, LC, Bloomsmith, MA, McMillan, JL, Perlman, JE and Martin, AL 2009 Positive reinforcement training to enhance the voluntary movement of group-housed sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys atys). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 48: 192–195Google Scholar
Videan, EN, Fritz, J, Murphy, J, Howell, S and Heward, CB 2005 Does training chimpanzees to present for injection lead to reduced stress? Laboratory Primate Newsletter 44: 1–2Google Scholar