Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Knierim, U
and
Winckler, C
2009.
On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
451.
Tuyttens, Frank A.M.
Vanhonacker, Filiep
Van Poucke, Els
and
Verbeke, Wim
2010.
Quantitative verification of the correspondence between the Welfare Quality® operational definition of farm animal welfare and the opinion of Flemish farmers, citizens and vegetarians.
Livestock Science,
Vol. 131,
Issue. 1,
p.
108.
Mazurek, Mickael
Prendiville, Daniel J
Crowe, Mark A
Veissier, Isabelle
and
Earley, Bernadette
2010.
An on-farm investigation of beef suckler herds using an animal welfare index (AWI).
BMC Veterinary Research,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
Hocquette, Jean-François
and
Chatellier, Vincent
2011.
Prospects for the European beef sector over the next 30 years.
Animal Frontiers,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
20.
Phythian, C.J.
Michalopoulou, E.
Jones, P.H.
Winter, A.C.
Clarkson, M.J.
Stubbings, L.A.
Grove-White, D.
Cripps, P.J.
and
Duncan, J.S.
2011.
Validating indicators of sheep welfare through a consensus of expert opinion.
Animal,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 6,
p.
943.
Mazurek, Mickael
McGee, Mark
Minchin, William
Crowe, Mark A.
and
Earley, Bernadette
2011.
Is the avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans influenced by either the dominant or flightiest animal in the group?.
Applied Animal Behaviour Science,
Vol. 132,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
107.
Veissier, I
Jensen, KK
Botreau, R
and
Sandøe, P
2011.
Highlighting ethical decisions underlying the scoring of animal welfare in the Welfare Quality® scheme.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
89.
Wiseman-Orr, ML
Scott, EM
and
Nolan, AM
2011.
Development and testing of a novel instrument to measure health-related quality of life (HRQL) of farmed pigs and promote welfare enhancement (Part 1).
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
535.
Miele, M
Veissier, I
Evans, A
and
Botreau, R
2011.
Animal welfare: establishing a dialogue between science and society.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
103.
Miele, Mara
2011.
The Taste of Happiness: Free-Range Chicken.
Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 9,
p.
2076.
Swanson, J.C.
Lee, Y.
Thompson, P.B.
Bawden, R.
and
Mench, J.A.
2011.
Integration: Valuing stakeholder input in setting priorities for socially sustainable egg production.
Poultry Science,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 9,
p.
2110.
Hocquette, Jean-François
Botreau, Raphaëlle
Picard, Brigitte
Jacquet, Alain
Pethick, David W.
and
Scollan, Nigel D.
2012.
Opportunities for predicting and manipulating beef quality.
Meat Science,
Vol. 92,
Issue. 3,
p.
197.
Sundrum, Albert
2012.
Organic Meat Production and Processing.
p.
87.
2012.
Statement on the use of animal‐based measures to assess the welfare of animals.
EFSA Journal,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 6,
D’Eath, RB
2012.
Repeated locomotion scoring of a sow herd to measure lameness: consistency over time, the effect of sow characteristics and inter-observer reliability.
Animal Welfare,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
219.
HOCQUETTE, Jean‐François
CAPEL, Carine
DAVID, Valérie
GUÉMENÉ, Daniel
BIDANEL, Joël
PONSART, Claire
GASTINEL, Pierre‐Louis
BAIL, Pierre‐Yves Le
MONGET, Philippe
MORMÈDE, Pierre
BARBEZANT, Maurice
GUILLOU, Florian
and
PEYRAUD, Jean‐Louis
2012.
Objectives and applications of phenotyping network set‐up for livestock.
Animal Science Journal,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 7,
p.
517.
Jensen, T.B.
Kristensen, H.H.
and
Toft, N.
2012.
Quantifying the impact of lameness on welfare and profitability of finisher pigs using expert opinions.
Livestock Science,
Vol. 149,
Issue. 3,
p.
209.
Whittaker, A L
Howarth, G S
and
Hickman, D L
2012.
Effects of space allocation and housing density on measures of wellbeing in laboratory mice: a review.
Laboratory Animals,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
2013.
Animal Welfare in Veterinary Practice.
p.
169.
Siegford, Janice M.
2013.
Multidisciplinary Approaches and Assessment Techniques to Better Understand and Enhance Zoo Nonhuman Animal Welfare.
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
300.