Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:44:12.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Novel Operant Conditioning Test to Determine Whether Dairy Cows Dislike Passageways that Are Dark or Covered with Excreta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C J C Phillips  and
ID Morris
C J C Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 OES, UK School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
ID Morris
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Both the presence of slurry and dark conditions may deter dairy cows from using passageways in cubicle accommodation, thus restricting movement and normal behaviour. We attempted to train seven dairy cows to recognize the quantity of reward offered in a transparent tube containing molasses in a Y-maze. Only one cow failed to consistently select the aisle containing the larger reward. The cows were then individually offered the choice of traversing either a passageway with a 5cm-depth of cow excreta or a clean, dry passageway to collect their rewards. The quantity of the rewards on the two sides was varied between zero and 400ml of molasses to determine the price that the cows were prepared to pay for entering the aisle with excreta. Only two of the seven cows showed a clear avoidance of the passageway with excreta. There was a tendency (P < 0.1) for the cows to avoid the passageway with excreta only when it contained no reward and the clean passageway contained a reward of 400ml molasses. Otherwise, there was no clear avoidance of the passageway with excreta. We also investigated whether cows preferred to enter a lighted or unlighted passageway. All the cows, except one, showed a strong avoidance of the dark passage, even when it contained the largest reward and the lighted passage contained no reward. We conclude that dairy cows demonstrate only mild avoidance of passageways with excreta but strongly avoid passageways without lighting. Therefore, we suggest that passageways for dairy cows should be lit at all times.

Keywords

animal welfarecattleexcretalightingoperant conditioning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 65 - 72
Copyright
© 2001 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Biowey, R 1985 A Veterinary Book for Dairy Farmers pp 241–244. Farming Press: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Blowey, R 1993 Cattle Lameness and Hoofcare - An Illustrated Guide ρ 73. Farming Press: Ipswich, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M, Pain, B F and Leaver, J D 1975 The effects of slurry on the acceptability of swards to grazing cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85: 331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electricity Agricultural Advisory Service 1990 Controlled Environments for Livestock pp 23. Farm Electric Centre: Stoneleigh, UKGoogle Scholar
Garstang, J R and Mudd, C H 1971 The rejection of contaminated herbage by dairy cows. Journal of the British Grassland Society 26: 194 (Abstract)Google Scholar
Grandin, T 1998 Objective scoring of animal handling and stunning practices at slaughter plants. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association 212: 36–39Google ScholarPubMed
Huang, H J, Chiou, P W S, Chen, C R, Chiang, J K and Yu, B 1999 Effects of dried rice, distillers’ and grain supplementation on the performance of lactating cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 77: 303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, M R, Kyriazakis, I, Gordon, I J and Jackson, F 1999 Trade-offs between nutrient intake and faecal avoidance in herbivore foraging decisions: the effect of animal parasitic status, level of feeding motivation and sward nitrogen content. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 310–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laws, J A, Rook, A J and Pain, B F 1996 Diet selection by cattle offered a choice between swards treated or untreated with slurry: effects of application method and time since application. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDiarmaid, B N and Watkin, B R 1972 The cattle dung patch. 3. Distribution and rate of decay of dung patches and their influence on grazing behaviour. Journal of the British Grassland Society 27: 48–54Google Scholar
Marten, G C and Donker, J D 1966 Animal excrement as a factor influencing acceptability of grazed forage. In (unpublished): Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, Finland (7-16 July 1966, Helsinki, Finland) pp 359–363Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1968 Rejection of grass by cows. Great House Experimental Husbandry Farm Annual Report 1968: 28–29Google Scholar
Pain, B F, Leaver, J D and Broom, D M 1974 effects of cow slurry on herbage production, intake by cattle and grazing behaviour. Journal of the British Grassland Society 29: 85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C 2001 Principles of Cattle Production. CAB International: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Arab, T M 1998 The preference of individually-penned cattle to conduct certain behaviours in the light or the dark. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Morris, I D 2000 The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet or covered with a slurry of excreta. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1767–1772CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C J C, Morris, I D, Lomas, C A and Lockwood, S J 2000 The locomotion of cattle in passageways with different light intensities. Animal Welfare 9: 421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Boissy, A, Terlouw, E M C, de Passille, A M B 1999 Opioid peptides and behavioral and physiological responses of dairy cows to social isolation in unfamiliar surroundings. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2918–2924CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J H, Wathes, C M and Baldwin, B A 1996 The preference of pigs for fresh air over ammoniated air. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiguo, L and Phillips, C J C 1991 The effects of supplementary light on the behaviour and performance of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar