Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:23:30.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nest-building behaviour in male rats from three inbred strains: BN/HsdCpb, BDIX/Or1Ico and LEW/Mol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

IM Jegstrup ,
R Vestergaard ,
W Vach  and
M Ritskes-Hoitinga
IM Jegstrup*
Affiliation:
Biomedical Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 23 Winsloewparken, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
R Vestergaard
Affiliation:
Biomedical Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 23 Winsloewparken, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
W Vach
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Southern Denmark, Sdr. Boulevard 23a, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
M Ritskes-Hoitinga
Affiliation:
Biomedical Laboratory, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 23 Winsloewparken, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three inbred strains of male laboratory rat (BN/HsdCpb, BDIX/Or1Ico and LEW/Mol) were provided with nest boxes and nest materials, and were observed for nest-building activity. After 7 days, each cage and nest box was examined. Each nest was weighed and scored for complexity, and returned to the cage. This was repeated after a further 7 days and the nest removed completely. This routine was repeated three times. All three strains of rat built nests inside the nest box and showed the same stages of construction. There was a significant increase in nest complexity between day 7 and day 14 in the strains BN and BDIX. Furthermore, BDIX rats used significantly more material for the nests, compared with the BN and LEW rats. In a second experiment, using the same rats, nest material was offered in four different ways. LEW rats used nesting material irrespective of where it was placed; BN rats only used straw placed on the top of the cage when no alternative was provided in the cage, and would not use the nest box roof when it was covered with bedding; whereas BDIX rats would only use nest material placed within the cage and would not use straw placed on the cage lid. BN rats also used nest material to cover the entrance to the nest box, a practice not carried out by the other strains. This study demonstrates that these rat strains have retained their natural nest-building behaviour. We suggest that the correct stimuli must be provided in order for this behaviour to be exhibited; in addition, the way in which the nest materials are provided must be in accordance with strain-specific characteristics.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourenrichmenthousingnestrats
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 2: The Three Rs: past, present and future , May 2005 , pp. 149 - 156
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Berdoy, M 2003 The Laboratory Rat: A Natural History. Available at: www.ratlife.orgGoogle Scholar
Bermant, G and Davidson, JM 1974 Sex and hormones. In: Dethier, VG and Zeigler, HP (eds) Biological Bases of Sexual Behaviour pp 122–137. Harper & Row: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Blom, H, Van Tintelen, G, Van Vorstenbosch, CJAHV, Baumans, V and Beynen, AC 1996 Preferences of mice and rats for types of bedding material. Laboratory Animals 30: 234–244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calhoun, JB 1962 The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat. HEW Public Health Service: Bethesda, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I 1961 The interactions of unlearned behaviour patterns and learning in mammals. In: Fessard, A, Gerard, RW and Konorski, J (eds) Brain Mechanisms and Learning pp 53–73. Blackwell: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Ewert, JP 1980 Neuroethology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, CJ 2004 Effect of cage bedding on temperature regulation and metabolism of group-housed female mice. Comparative Medicine 54(1): 63–68Google ScholarPubMed
Jegstrup, IM and Ritskes-Hoitinga, M 2004 Behavioural and welfare benefits using environmental enrichment for social housed rats. In: Proceedings of the 8th FELASA Symposium, 17–20 June 2002, Aachen, Germany pp 38-42Google Scholar
Kinder, EF 1927 A study of the nest-building activity of the albino rat. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 47(2): 117–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, V, Deeny, AA, Blanchet, HM, Boot, R, Hansen, AK, Hem, A, Herck, HV, Kunstyr, I, Milite, G, Needham, JR, Nicklas, W, Perrot, A, Rehbinder, C, Richard, Y and Vroey, GD 1994 Recommendations for health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit breeding colonies. Laboratory Animals 28: 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, MM 2002 Comfortable quarters for rats in research institutions. In: Reinhardt V and Reinhardt A (eds) Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals, 9th Edition. Animal Welfare Institute: Washington DC, USA. Available at: www.awionline.org/pubs/cq02/cqindex.htmlGoogle Scholar
Manning, A 1979 Motivation. In: Barrington, EJW, Willis, AJ and Sleigh, MA (eds) An Introduction to Animal Behaviour pp 108–133. JW Arrowsmith Ltd: Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
Manser, CE, Broom, DM, Overend, P and Morris, TH 1998a Operant studies to determine the strength of preference in laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 32: 36–41Google ScholarPubMed
Manser, CE, Broom, DM, Overend, P and Morris, TH 1998b Investigation into the preference of laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 32: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Townsend, P 1997 Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Animal Welfare 6: 95–103Google Scholar
Van Loo, PLP and Baumans, V 2004 The importance of learning young: the use of nesting material in laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 38: 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar