Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:23:34.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The need for monitoring farm animal welfare during mass killing for disease eradication purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

C Berg*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Environment and Health and Swedish Centre for Animal Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 234, SE 532 23 Skara, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The term ‘depopulation’ is used in this case to describe mass euthanasia or killing of groups of animals on a farm for emergency disease eradication purposes. There are a number of guidelines for monitoring animal welfare during such operations, eg the OIE Terrestrial Health Code and the EU regulation on protection of animals at the time of killing, which can be useful when designing a specific monitoring system for depopulation. In this paper, the responsibilities of the competent authorities are identified, and a systematic approach to monitoring on-farm killing is proposed, including three major critical points: i) animal handling prior to killing; ii) the stun/kill quality, ie the effectiveness of the method used to render the animals unconscious and dead; and iii) confirmation of death prior to carcase disposal. The importance of good biosecurity routines, efficient disease detection systems, relevant training of staff and thorough contingency planning to prevent animal welfare problems from arising is strongly emphasised. It is the responsibility of national competent authorities to provide the appointed official veterinarians in charge of monitoring animal welfare during depopulation with proper tools, including anything from appropriate knowledge and practical checklists to the authority to demand immediate corrective action when necessary, and to develop systems for feedback and incorporation of experiences from previous outbreaks into the national contingency plans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2007 AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia. http://www.avma.org/issues/animal_welfare/euthanasia.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2004 Welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing methods. Scientific Report of the Scientific Panel for Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to welfare aspects of animal stunning and killing methods. EFSA AHAW/04-027 pp 241. http://www.efsa.europe.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/45.pdf 10.2903/j.efsa.2004.45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C 2007 Emergency killing of poultry during disease outbreaks in the Nordic countries. Proceedings XIII International Congress in Animal Hygiene pp 10531059. 17-21 June 2007, Tartu, EstoniaGoogle Scholar
Elbers, ARW, Stegman, A, Moser, H, Ekker, HM, Smak, JA and Pluimers, FH 1999 The classical swine fever epidemic 1997–1998 in the Netherlands: descriptive epidemiology. Preventive Veterinary medicine 42: 157184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00074-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union 1993 Council Directive (EC) No 93/119/EC of 22 December 1993 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Slaughter or Killing. EC: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
European Union 2009 Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. EC: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Galvin, JW, Blokhuis, H, Chimbombi, MC, Jong, D and Wotton, S 2005 Killing of animals for disease control purposes. Revue Scientifique et technique - Office International des Epizooties 24(2): 71173310.20506/rst.24.2.1603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerritzen, MA, Lambooij, E, Stegeman, JA and Spruijt, BM 2006 Slaughter of poultry during the epidemic of avian influenza in the Netherlands in 2003. Veterinary Record 159: 3942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.159.2.39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golab, GC 2011 2011 Update of the ‘AVMA guidelines on euthanasia’ and creation of the ‘AVMA guidelines for the mass depopulation of animals’. Proceedings of the Humane Slaughter Association Centenary International Symposium: Recent Advances in the Welfare of Livestock at Slaughter. 30 June-1 July, Portsmouth UKGoogle Scholar
Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards project 2009 Livestock Emergency Guidelines and Standards. http://www.live-stock-emergency.net/ 10.3362/9781780440262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) 2011b Terrestrial Animal Health Code, ch 7.6. http://www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_1.7.6.htmGoogle Scholar
Sandström, V, Wotton, SB, Berg, C and Algers, B 2008 Proposal of monitoring system for the assessment of cattle welfare in abattoirs. Welfare Quality Sub Project 2, WP 2.3 Report pp 55. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Skara, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Watkiss, P and Smith, A 2005 CBA of Foot and Mouth Disease Control Strategies: Environmental Impacts. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/fmd/documents/environmental_report.pdfGoogle Scholar