Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:46:51.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A model to quantify the anticipatory response in cats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

G Tomi ,
A Martorell ,
C Torre ,
M Compagnucci  and
X Manteca
G Tomi*
Affiliation:
Carrer de les Arts 16, Corbera de Llobregat, Barcelona 08757, Spain Department de Ciencia Animal y de los Alimentos, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain
A Martorell
Affiliation:
Department de Ciencia Animal y de los Alimentos, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain
C Torre
Affiliation:
Affinity Petcare, Pl Xavier Cugat, 2-Edificio D, 3a Planta, St Cugat Nord 08174, Spain
M Compagnucci
Affiliation:
Affinity Petcare, Pl Xavier Cugat, 2-Edificio D, 3a Planta, St Cugat Nord 08174, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Department de Ciencia Animal y de los Alimentos, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of this paper was to develop a protocol to study the anticipatory response in cats as a measure of welfare. Seven experimental cats were trained in a classical conditioning paradigm to associate a sound with food arrival, while sound and food were presented without contingency in four control cats. Increasing the interval between sound and food up to 60 s allowed a detailed description of cats’ anticipatory response. Compared to control animals, experimental cats showed significantly shorter latencies to orient towards (average 2.96 s) and approach the source of the sound (12.98 s) as well as longer durations of exploring and standing by the source of the sound (namely 69.97 and 52.32%, respectively of the interval sound-food). Experimental cats also exhibited behaviours that may derive from predation patterns, eg short pauses and predatory crouch while approaching the source of the sound (namely in 28.93 and 29.64% of trials), rapid head movements while watching it (55.36% of trials) and pouncing on the food (9.29% of trials). This protocol should be further studied to assess its effectiveness in highlighting differences according to the welfare of individual cats.

Keywords

animal welfareanticipatory responsecatcat cognitionclassical conditioningcognitive bias
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 2011 , pp. 191 - 200
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bassett, L 2003 Effects of predictability of feeding routines on the behaviour and welfare of captive primates. PhD dissertation, University of Stirling, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1988 The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D and Johnson, K 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K 1986 Predictability of feeding: its effects on agonistic behaviour and growth in grower pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL and Strawn, W 1993 Behavioral and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, LP 2003 The Cat: Its Behavior, Nutrition & Health pp 146. Iowa State Press: Ames, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
Casey, RA and Bradshaw, JWS 2007 The assessment of welfare. In: Rochlitz, I (ed) The Welfare of Cats pp 23–46. Springer: The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudink, S, de Jonge, FH and Spruijt, BM 2004 Anticipation to reward: a tool to improve welfare in husbandry pigs? In: Mannien, I and Valros, A (eds) Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE p 215. Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, J, Clark, DC, Scheftner, WA and Gibbons, RD 1983 Assessing anhedonia in psychiatric patients: the pleasure scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 40: 79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grill, HJ and Berridge, KC 1985 Taste reactivity as measure of the neural control of palatability. In: Sprague, JM and Epstein, AN (eds) Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology pp 1–65. Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
Gunn-Moore, D, Moffat, K, Christe, LA and Head, E 2007 Cognitive dysfunction and the biology of ageing in cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice 48: 546–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, SW and Jeppesen, LL 2006 Temperament, stereotypies and anticipatory behaviour as measures of welfare in mink. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99: 172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, E, Paul, ES and Mendl, M 2004 Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature 427: 312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, J and Buchwald, J 1983 Eyeblink conditioning deficits in the old cat. Neurobiology of Ageing 4: 45–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huidobro, A and García-Hoz, V 2004 La extinción como un fenómeno de inhibición. In: Pellón, R and Huidobro, A (eds) Inteligencia y aprendizaje pp 168–188. Ariel: Barcelona, Spain. [Title translation: Intelligence and learning]Google Scholar
Immelmann, K and Beer, C 1989 A Dictionary of Ethology. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass, USAGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1997 Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly, in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 6: 243–254Google Scholar
Levine, MS, Lloyd, RL, Fisher, RS, Hull, CD and Buchwald, NA 1987 Sensory, motor and cognitive alterations in aged cats. Neurobiology of Ageing 8: 253–263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCune, S 1994 Caged cats: avoiding problems and providing solutions. Newsletter of the Companion Animal Study Group No 7: 33–40Google Scholar
McCune, S, Stevenson, J, Fretwell, L, Thompson, A and Mills, DS 2008 Ageing does not significantly affect performance in a spatial learning task in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112: 345–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendl, M, Burman, O, Laughlin, K and Paul, E 2001 Animal memory and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 10: S141–S159Google Scholar
Moe, RO, Bakken, M and Kittilsen, S 2006 A note on reward-related behaviour and emotional expressions in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes): basis for a novel tool to study animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moelk, M 1944 Vocalising in the house cat: a phonetic and functional study. American Journal of Psychology 57: 184–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygren, TE, Isen, AM, Taylor, PJ and Dulin, J 1996 The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 66: 59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Doherty, JP, Deichmann, R, Critchley, HD and Dolan, RJ 2002 Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron 33: 815–826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, ES, Harding, EJ and Mendl, M 2005 Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 29: 469–491CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlov, IP 1927 Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, AL and Broom, DM 1995 The behaviour and welfare of cats in quarantine. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Human-Animal Interactions pp 89. Afirac: Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Rollin, BE 1993 Animal welfare, science, and value. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6: 44–50Google Scholar
Schultz, W, Dayan, P and Montague, PR 1997 A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593–1599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segerstrom, SC 2001 Optimism and attentional bias for negative and positive stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 1334–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruijt, BM, van den Bos, R and Pijlman, FTA 2001 A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorne, CJ 1982 Feeding behaviour in the cat: recent advances. Journal of Small Animal Practice 23: 555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, DC and Meister, O 1988 Hunting behaviour of the domestic cat. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 111–121. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
UK Cat Behaviour Working Group 1995 Ethogram for Behavioural Study of Domestic Cat (Felis silvestris catus). Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, CL, Pijlman, FT, Koning, HA, Diergaarde, L, van Ree, JM and Spruijt, BM 1999 Isolation changes the incentive value of sucrose and social behaviour in juvenile and adult rats. Behavioural Brain Research 106: 133–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bos, R, Meijer, MK, van Renselaar, JP, van der Harst, JE and Spruijt, BM 2003 Anticipation is differently expressed in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) in the same Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. Behavioural Brain Research 141: 83–89Google Scholar
van der Harst, JE and Spruijt, BM 2007 Tools to measure and improve animal welfare: reward-related behaviour. Animal Welfare 16: 67–73Google Scholar
van der Harst, JE, Baars, JM and Spruijt, BM 2003a Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Behavioural Brain Research 142: 151–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Harst, JE, Baars, JM and Spruijt, BM 2005 Announced rewards counteract the impairment of anticipatory behaviour in socially stressed rats. Behavioural Brain Research 161: 183–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Harst, JE, Fermont, PCJ, Bilstra, AE and Spruijt, BM 2003b Access to enriched housing is rewarding to rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Animal Behaviour 66: 493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinke, CM, van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2006 Anticipatory hyperactivity and stereotypical behaviour in American mink (Mustela vison) in three housing systems differing in the amount of enrichment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 362–368Google Scholar
Von Frijtag, JC, Reijmers, LGJE, van der Harst, JE, Leus, IE, van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2000 Defeat followed by individual housing results in long-term impaired reward- and cognition-related behaviours in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 117: 137–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welp, T, Rushen, J, Kramer, DL, Festa-Bianchet, M and de Passille, AM 2004 Vigilance as a measure of fear in dairy cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P 1985 Abnormal behaviours in farm animals: ethological implications. The Netherlands Journal of Zoology 35: 279–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar