Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:01:14.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodological Aspects for the Assessment of Social Behaviour and Avoidance Distance on Dairy Farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C Mülleder ,
J Troxler  and
S Waiblinger
C Mülleder*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
J Troxler
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
S Waiblinger
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Some aspects of on-farm assessment of social behaviour and avoidance distance were investigated on 20 Austrian dairy farms. The avoidance distance of at least 75% of cows was assessed. Social behaviour of the cows was observed for one hour and the number of animals standing was recorded every 10 min. Lameness of each animal was scored, and Spearman correlations were calculated. Generally, the avoidance distance of the cows was very low. Lameness did not correlate significantly with avoidance distance. The number of agonistic interactions with body contact per cow correlated negatively with the percentage of lame animals (rs = -0.49; P = 0.029). However, this correlation was no longer found (rs = -0.22; not significant) when calculated on the basis of standing animals only. The total number of social interactions correlated highly with the number of social interactions when interactions in the feeding rack were disregarded. The present study suggests that lameness confounds the assessment of social behaviour but not that of avoidance distance of cows, and that social interactions of animals standing in the feeding racks can be disregarded without decreasing the reliability of the assessments.

Keywords

animal welfareavoidance distancecattlelamenesson-farm assessmentsocial behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 12 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , November 2003 , pp. 579 - 584
Copyright
© 2003 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Broom, D M and Galindo, F A 1997 Behavior. In: Greenough, P R (ed) Lameness in Cattle pp 297–299. W B Saunders: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Chesterton, R N, Pfeifer, D U, Morris, R S and Tanner, C M 1989 Environmental and behavioural factors affecting the prevalence of foot lameness in New Zealand dairy herds — a case control study. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 37: 135–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, L K 1998 Affecting the incidence of lameness by altering the housing. In: Lischer Ch J and Ossent P (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants, 7-10 September 1998, Lucerne, Switzerland pp 38–39Google Scholar
Sandøe, P, Munksgaard, L, Bådsgård, N P and Jensen, K H 1997 How to manage the management factor — assessing animal welfare at farm level. In: Sørensen, J T (ed) Livestock Farming Systems — More Than Food Production. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Livestock Farming Systems pp 221–230. EAAP Satellite Symposium, Publication No 89, European Association for Animal Production: Roma, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S and Menke, C 1998 Can reactions of cows be used for on-farm assessment of human-animal relationship? In: Veissier I and Boissy A (eds) Proceedings of the 32nd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 102. 21-25 July 1998, Clermont-Ferrand, France. INRA: FranceGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Knierim, U and Winckler, C 2001 Development of an on-farm welfare assessment system in dairy cows using an epidemiological approach. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica (Section A — Animal Science) 30: 73–77 (Suppl)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Coleman, G 2002 The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, W R 2001 Lameness in cattle. Irish Veterinary Journal 54: 129–130Google Scholar
Winckler, C and Willen, S 2001 The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica (Section A — Animal Science) 30: 103–107 (Suppl)CrossRefGoogle Scholar