Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:21:18.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Locomotion of Dairy Cows in Passageways with Different Light Intensities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C J C Phillips ,
I D Morris ,
C A Lomas  and
S J Lockwood
C J C Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
I D Morris
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
C A Lomas
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
S J Lockwood
Affiliation:
School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Guidelines for the housing of dairy cows do not address the provision of supplementary lighting in passageways, other than for inspection of the animals. Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether lighting passageways to various intensities influenced the locomotion of dairy cows. The first experiment compared the locomotion of dairy cows in a dark or lighted passageway as they walked back to their accommodation from milking. When the passageway was dark, the cows took shorter but more rapid steps - which probably increased their stability. In the second experiment, cows walked down a cubicle passageway to receive a food reward, with the light intensity in the building varying from 0-250 lux. Step length and stepping rate were recorded, as well as the angles of the cows’ leg joints (which were measured from video recordings). Once again, the cows increased their stepping rate in the dark, and this resulted in an increased walking rate, perhaps because they wished to return more rapidly to other members of their group and found the darkness aversive. In addition, the arcs of travel of the metacarpophalangeal joint and of the fore- and hindfeet angles to the floor were reduced in the dark, probably increasing the cows’ stability, and were greatest at 119 lux. The slowest walking rate was observed at 39 lux. Hence, the optimum illumination for dairy cow locomotion may lie approximately between 39 and 119 lux, as measured by our technique.

We conclude that during locomotion in dark passageways cows have to modify their walking behaviour significantly, so that the provision of at least a low level of lighting is desirable at night.

Keywords

animal welfaredairy cowlight intensitylocomotion
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , November 2000 , pp. 421 - 431
Copyright
© 2000 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anderson, S J and Holliday, I E 1996 Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 15: 545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, R and Van der Velde, E 1984 Le logement des veaux de boucherie. Revue d'Agriculture 37: 719–723Google Scholar
Dannenmann, K, Buchenauer, D and Fliegner, H 1985 The behaviour of calves under four levels of lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 13: 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorley, WG 1948 An analysis of reflected glare. Illuminating Engineering, Including Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, New York 43: 85–103Google Scholar
Electricity Council 1977 Essentials for Farm Lighting. Electricity Council: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Eiermann, U 1978 Untersuchungen über die sehschärfe beim Kalb in Abhängigheit von der Beleuchtungsstärke. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Fry, G A and Alpern, M 1955 Effect of a peripheral glare source upon the apparent brightness of an object. Illuminating Engineering, Including Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, New York 50: 31–38Google Scholar
Heffner, R S and Heffner, H E 1992 Visual factors in sound localisation in mammals. Journal of Comparative Neurology 317: 219–232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irps, H 1981 Choice behaviour of young cattle given various types of flooring. Tierzuchter 33: 257–260Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Welsh Office Agriculture Department 1983 Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock - Cattle. MAFF Publications: Alnwick, UKGoogle Scholar
Morris, I D 1994 The Effect of Floor Type and Lighting Intensity on Locomotive Behaviour in Dairy Cows. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales, Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
Peterson, J H and Simonson, E 1952 The effect of glare on accommodation near point. American Journal of Ophthalmology 34: 1088–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Arab, TM 1998 The preference of individually-penned cattle to conduct certain behaviours in the light or the dark. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Denne, S K P J 1988 Variation in the grazing behaviour of dairy cows, as measured by a vibrarecorder and bite count monitor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21: 329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Leaver, J D 1986 The effect of forage supplementation on the behaviour of grazing dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Morris, I D In press The locomotion of dairy cows on concrete floors that are dry, wet or covered with a slurry of excreta. Journal of Dairy Science:Google Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Schofield, S A 1989 The effect of supplementary light on the production and behaviour of dairy cows. Animal Production 48: 293–303Google Scholar
Phillips, C J C and Weiguo, L 1991 Brightness discrimination by cattle relative to that of humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, M, Berthoud, A L and Heusser, H 1974 Über Belichtung und Beleuchtung in Ställen, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Belichtungsverhältnisse in neuen schweizerischen Rindviehställen. Schweizer Achivfür Tierheilkunde 116: 659–677Google Scholar
Rochon-Duvigneaud, A 1943 Les Yeux et la Vision des Vertebrates. Masson: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Ryan, B F, Joiner, B L, and Ryan, T A 1985 Minitab® Handbook, 2nd edition. Duxbury Press: Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
Smith, A T 1988 Measurement of light intensity. In: Phillips C J C and Forbes J M (eds) Photoperiodic Manipulation of Cattle Production (Technical Report No 4, University of Wales, Bangor) pp 27-20. University of Wales, Bangor: Bangor, UKGoogle Scholar
Weiguo, L and Phillips, C J C 1991 The effects of supplementary light on the behaviour and performance of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar