Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:30:07.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Live chilling of turbot and subsequent effect on behaviour, muscle stiffness, muscle quality, blood gases and chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

B Roth ,
AK Imsland  and
A Foss
B Roth*
Affiliation:
Nofima-Norconserv A/S, Food Aquaculture and Fisheries Research, Box 327, N-4002, Stavanger, Norway Department of Biology, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
AK Imsland
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway Akvaplan niva, Iceland Office, Akralind 4, 201 Kopavogur, Iceland
A Foss
Affiliation:
Akvaplan niva, Bergen Office, PO Box 2026 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the commercial slaughter of farmed turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), a total of 67 fish were, on six occasions, removed from their rearing conditions at 14°C and put, as is standard commercial practice, into chilled seawater (-1.5 to -0.8°C) to monitor behavioural, muscular, osmoregulatory and respiratory responses during chilling time (90 min). Results show that a thermal insult alters the iso-osmotic balance, leading not only to an Na+ influx and an intracellular release of Ca2+ and K+, but also to a disturbance of respiratory function, leading to acidosis as a result of H+ and CO2 accumulation, increased pCO2 and reduced HCO3− in the blood. Once the internal temperature dropped below 1°C, the muscles contracted (cold shortening) and, although the fish were still alive, they reverted to a state of rigor, leading to a complete breakdown in their ability to move or ventilate and resembling an unconscious condition or death. Remarkably, the fish were able to prevent themselves undergoing hypoxia as pO2 remained within acceptable limits. No changes in muscle pH were observed and, thus, no noted effects on textural properties. We conclude that live chilling from 14°C to approximately -1°C is a highly questionable practice. It causes physical and physiological changes that are generally associated with stress and, in the case of observed forced muscle contractions, could lead to severe pain. Furthermore, we conclude that cold shortening associated with chilling can be easily mistaken for rigor mortis and, as such, should be subject to further attention in future research on quality.

Keywords

animal welfarehypothermialive chillingqualitystunningturbot
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 33 - 41
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ashley, PJ, Sneddon, LU and McCrohan, CR 2007 Nociception in fish: stimulus-response properties of receptors on the head of trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Brain Research 1166: 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutilier, RG, Tattersall, GJ and Donohoe, PH 2000 Metabolic consequences of behavioural hypothermia and oxygen detection in submerged overwintering frogs. Zoology Analysis of Complex Systems 102: 111–119Google Scholar
Braithwaite, VA and Boulcott, P 2007 Pain perception, aversion and fear in fish. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75: 131–138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curran, CA, Poulten, RG, Brueton, A and Jones, NSD 1986 Cold shock reactions in iced tropical fish. Journal of Food Technology 21: 289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohoe, PH, West, TG and Boutilier, RG 2000 Factors affecting membrane permeability and ionic homeostasis in the cold-submerged frog. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 405–414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erikson, U, Hultmann, L and Steen, JE 2006 Live chilling of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) combined with mild carbon dioxide anaesthesia I. Establishing a method for large-scale processing of farmed fish. Aquaculture 252: 183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambooij, E, van de Vis, JW, Kloosterboer, RJ and Pieterse, C 2002 Welfare aspects of live chilling and freezing of farmed eel (Anguilla anguilla L.): neurological and behavioural assessment. Aquaculture 210: 159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, KH, Tsuchimoto, M, Onishi, T, Wu, ZH, Jabarsyah, A, Misima, T and Tachibana, K 1998 Differences in progress of rigor mortis between cultured red sea bream and cultured Japanese flounder. Fisheries Science 64: 309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morzel, M, Sohier, D and van de Vis, H 2003 Evaluation of slaughtering methods for turbot with respect to animal welfare and flesh quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 83: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, RWH, Alcasid, MV and Panggat, EB 1987 Cold shock in fish. Its characteristics in bighead. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 22: 637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, DHF and Kestin, SC 2002 Methods used to kill fish: Field observations and literature reviewed. Animal Welfare 11: 269–282Google Scholar
Rorvik, KA, Skjervold, PO, Fjaera, SO, Morkore, T and Steien, SH 2001 Body temperature and seawater adaptation in farmed Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout during prolonged chilling. Journal of Fish Biology 59: 330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, JD 2002 The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, JD 2007 Anthropomorphism and ‘mental welfare’ of fishes. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 75: 139–154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, B, Slinde, E and Robb, DHF 2006 Field evaluation of live chilling with CO2 on stunning Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the subsequent effect on quality. Aquaculture Research 37: 799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, B, Imsland, A, Gunnarsson, S, Foss, A and Schelvis, R 2007 Slaughter quality and rigor contraction in farmed turbot (Scophthalmus maximus); a comparison between different stunning methods. Aquaculture 272: 754–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, N, Fitzgerald, RD, Cross, TF, Teurtrie, G and Kerry, JP 2002 Slaughtering method and dietary alpha-tocopheryl acetate supplementation affect rigor mortis and fillet shelf-life of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L). Aquaculture Research 33: 703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjervold, PO, Fjaera, SO and Ostby, PB 1999 Rigor in Atlantic salmon as affected by crowding stress prior to chilling before slaughter. Aquaculture 175: 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjervold, PO, Fjaera, SO, Ostby, PB and Einen, O 2001 Live-chilling and crowding stress before slaughter of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 192: 265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, LU 2003 Trigeminal somatosensory innervation of the head of a teleost fish with particular reference to nociception. Brain Research 972: 44–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanck, MWT, Booms, GHR, Eding, EH, Bonga, SEW and Komen, J 2000 Cold shocks: a stressor for common carp. Journal of Fish Biology 57: 881–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushio, H, Watabe, S, Iwamoto, M and Hashimoto, K 1991 Ultrastructural evidence for temperature-dependent Ca2+ release from fish sarcoplasmic-reticulum during rigor mortis. Food Structure 10: 267–275Google Scholar
van de Vis, H, Kestin, S, Robb, D, Oehlenschlager, J, Lambooij, B, Munkner, W, Kuhlmann, H, Kloosterboer, K, Tejada, M, Huidobro, A, Ottera, H, Roth, B, Sorensen, NK, Akse, L, Byrne, H and Nesvadba, P 2003 Is humane slaughter of fish possible for industry? Aquaculture Research 34: 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar