Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:15:32.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Environmental Enrichment on Aggressive Behaviour and Dominance Relationships in Growing Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

N E O'Connell*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
V E Beattie
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
*
Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study examined the effects of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Three hundred and twenty pigs were reared from birth to 15 weeks of age in either barren or enriched environments. The barren environments were defined by common intensive housing conditions (ie with slatted floors and in terms of recommended space allowances), while the enriched environments incorporated extra space and substrates for manipulation. Aggressive behaviour was observed in a social confrontation test during the suckling period and dominance relationships were assessed from a food competition test at 12 weeks of age. Animals were weighed at regular intervals throughout the experiment. Environmental enrichment reduced the expression of aggressive behaviour. Pigs from enriched rearing environments fought significantly less with unfamiliar animals than those from barren environments when tested under standard conditions (mean of 1.46 vs 2.75 fights per 30min test for enriched vs barren environments; SEM 0.20, P < 0.001). The nature of dominance relationships also appeared to differ between barren and enriched environments. In barren environments, dominance among pen mates was correlated with aggression (r = 0.33, P < 0.01), whereas in enriched environments it was correlated with body weight (r = 0.24, P < 0.01). Correlations between behaviour in the social confrontation and food competition tests suggested that dominance characteristics were established early in life and remained stable through the growing period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Barnett, J L, Hemsworth, P H, Cronin, G M, Newman, E A, McCailum, T H and Chilton, D 1992 Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34\ 207220Google Scholar
Beattie, V E, Sneddon, I A and Walker, N 1993 Behaviour and productivity of the domestic pig in barren and enriched environments. Livestock Environment IV. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers pp 4350. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
Beattie, V E, Walker, N and Sneddon, I A 1995a Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Animal Welfare 4: 207220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, V E, Walker, N and Sneddon, I A 1995b Effect of rearing environment and change of environment on the behaviour of gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 5765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beilharz, R G and Cox, D F 1967 Social dominance in swine. Animal Behaviour 15: 117122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benus, R F, Koolhaas, J M and Van Oortmerssen, G A 1987 Individual differences in behavioural reaction to a changing environment in mice and rats. Behaviour 100: 105122Google Scholar
Craig, J V 1986 Measuring social behavior: social dominance. Journal of Animal Science 62: 11201129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R, Amone, M and Mormede, P 1980 Effects of frustration on behaviour and plasma corticosteroid levels in pigs. Physiology & Behavior 24: 14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, F H, Bokkers, E A M, Schouten, WPG and Helmond, F A 1996 Rearing piglets in a poor environment: developmental aspects of social stress in pigs. Physiology & Behavior 60: 389396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonyou, H W, Rohde Parfet, K A, Anderson, D B and Olson, R D 1988 Effects of amperozide and azaperone on aggression and productivity of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 66: 28562864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hessing, M J C, Hagelso, A M, Van Beek, JAM, Wiepkema, P R, Scheuten, WPG and Krukow, R 1993 Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 285295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, E J, Broom, D M, Edwards, S A and Sibly, R M 1988 Social hierarchy and feeder access in a group of 20 sows using a computer-controlled feeder. Animal Production 47: 139148Google Scholar
Jones, R B 1995 Ontogeny of response to humans in handled and non-handled female domestic chicks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 261269Google Scholar
Jones, R B and Waddington, D 1992 Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handling and early environmental enrichment. Animal Behaviour 43: 10211033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agicultural Trust 1989 Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
McBride, G, James, J W and Wyeth, G S F 1965 Social behaviour of domestic animals VII. Variation in weaning weight in pigs. Animal Production 7: 6774Google Scholar
McGlone, J J and Curtis, S E 1985 Behavior and performance of weanling pigs in pens equipped with hide areas. Journal of Animal Science 60: 2024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, J J, Stansbury, W F and Tribble, L F 1987 Effects of heat and social stressors and within-pen weight variation on young pig performance and agonistic behavior. Journal of Animal Science 65: 456462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, G B and Ewbank, R 1973 The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. Animal Behaviour 21: 326334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A S, Gonyou, H W, Stookey, J M and McLaren, D G 1994 Effect of group composition and pen size on behavior, productivity and immune response of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 40: 1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G P and Paterson, A M 1993 The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, G P, Paterson, A M and Pearce, A N 1989 The influence of pleasant and unpleasant handling and the provision of toys on the growth and behaviour of male pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, S M 1974 The concept of dominance and methods of assessment. Animal Behaviour 22: 914930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, T E 1974 The concept of social dominance. Behavioral Biology 11: 131154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, A L, Salomons, M O, Tong, AKW, Sather, A P and Lepage, P 1990 The effect of environment enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 4152Google Scholar
Scheel, D E, Graves, H B and Sherritt, G W 1977 Nursing order, social dominance and growth in swine. Journal of Animal Science 45: 219229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stookey, J M and Gonyou, H W 1994 The effects of regrouping on behavioral and production parameters in finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 72: 28042811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinscow, T D V 1996 Statistics at Square One, 9th edition, BMJ Publishing Group: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Tan, SSL, Shackleton, D M and Beames, RM 1991 The effect of mixing unfamiliar individuals on the growth and production of finishing pigs. Animal Production 52: 201206Google Scholar
Vargas, J V, Craig, J V and Hines, R H 1987 Effects of feeding systems on social and feeding behavior and performance of finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 65: 463474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, J M, Zerweck, C and Anthony, A 1982 Effects of environmental enrichment on old mice. Developmental Psychobiology 15: 1318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed