Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:49:23.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Group housing of farmed silver fox cubs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

L Ahola ,
J Mononen ,
T Pyykönen  and
M Miskala
L Ahola*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN–70211 Kuopio, Finland
J Mononen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN–70211 Kuopio, Finland
T Pyykönen
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN–70211 Kuopio, Finland
M Miskala
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Biotechnology, University of Kuopio, PO Box 1627, FIN–70211 Kuopio, Finland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the present study, the effects of social environment on the welfare of farmed silver fox cubs were clarified. After weaning, cubs from silver fox litters were housed (1) singly, (2) in litters until the end of September and thereafter singly, or (3) in litters throughout their growing season. Separating the cubs at the onset of the species' natural dispersal time may not be strictly beneficial for the cubs because it may limit the animals' possibilities to fulfil their needs for social behaviour. However, the lower incidence of bite wounds in both the single housed cubs and the cubs from litters that were split in autumn showed some beneficial effects of separating the cubs. The cubs that were group housed in litters for the whole time were focussed on their own social system, were more averse to human presence and showed greater responses to acute stress than the cubs that were single housed for at least part of the time. However, the serum cortisol level following adrenocorticotropic hormone administration suggested that cubs that were group housed in litters were less stressed over the long-term compared with the cubs that were single housed for at least part of the time; the low incidence of stereotypic behaviour in the cubs raised in litters also supports this hypothesis. Accordingly, and despite some unsolved questions regarding interpretation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, the results from this present study show that social contacts were important for the welfare of silver fox cubs, and suggest that farmed silver fox cubs could possibly be raised in litters without jeopardising their welfare or deteriorating their fur quality.

Keywords

ACTH testanimal welfaregroup housingphysiologysilver foxstereotypies
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 39 - 47
Copyright
© 2006 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ahola, L 2002 Effects of Social and Physical Housing Environment on the Welfare in Silver Foxes (Vulpes vulpes). PhD Thesis, University of Kuopio. Kuopio University Publications C. Natural and Environmental Sciences 145Google Scholar
Ahola, L and Mononen, J 2002 Family break-up in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) housed in enlarged cage systems as families. Acta Ethology 4: 125–127Google Scholar
Ahola, L, Harri, M, Kasanen, S, Mononen, J and Pyykönen, T 2000 Effect of family housing of farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in outdoor enclosures on some behavioural and physiological parameters. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80: 427–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahola, L, Harri, M, Mononen, J, Pyykönen, T and Kasanen, S 2001 Welfare of farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes) housed in sibling groups in large outdoor enclosures. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 435–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahola, L, Mononen, J, Pyykönen, T, Mohaibes, M and Rekilä, T 2002 Effects of group size and space allocation on physiological, behavioural and production-related welfare parameters in farmed silver fox cubs. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 11: 185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, JL, Hemsworth, PH and Hand, AM 1983 Effects of chronic stress on some blood parameters in the pig. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beerda, B, Schilder, MBH, Bernadina, W, van Hooff, JARAM, de Vries, HW and Mol, JA 1999 Chronic stress in dogs subjected to social and spatial restriction. II. Hormonal and immunological responses. Physiology & Behavior 66: 243–254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, D and Johnson, KG 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K and Shepherdson, D 2000 Alleviating stress in zoo animals with environmental enrichment. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress. Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare pp 337–354. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Cavallini, P 1996 Variation in the social system of the red fox. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution 8: 323–342Google Scholar
Duncan, ND, Williams, DA and Lynch, GS 1998 Adaptations in rat skeletal muscle following long-term resistance exercise training. European Journal of Applied Physiology 77: 372–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Convention 1999 Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. Recommendation Concerning Fur Animals. T-AP (96)19. Council of Europe, France. http://www.mapya.es/ganaderia/pags/bienestar/pdf/recpeleteriaingles.pdf (accessed 18 October 2005)Google Scholar
Fernandez, X, Meunier-Salaün, MC and Mormede, P 1994 Agonistic behavior, plasma stress hormones, and metabolites in response to dyadic encounters in domestic pigs: interrelationships and effect of dominance status. Physiology & Behaviour 56: 841–847Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, MW 1987 Behaviour of Wolves, Dogs and Related Canids. Robert E Krieger: Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Fraser, AF and Broom, DM 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Baillière Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gattermann, R 1990 Verhaltensbiologisches Praktikum. VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag: Jena, Germany [Title translation: Practices for Behavioural Studies]Google Scholar
Greco, D and Stabenfeldt, GH 2002 Endocrine glands and their function. In: Cunningham, JG (ed) Textbook of Veterinary Physiology pp 341–372. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Hänninen, S, Mononen, J, Harjunpää, S, Ahola, L, Pyykönen, T, Mohaibes, M and Sepponen, J 2002 The effects of family housing on welfare of juvenile farmed mink (Mustela vison). In: Koene P and the Scientific Committee of the 36th ISAE Congress (eds) Proceedings of the 36th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 87. 6–10 August 2002. Egmond aan Zee, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Harris, S and Lloyd, HG 1991 Fox Vulpes vulpes. In: Corbet, GB and Harris, S (eds) The Handbook of British Mammals pp 351–367. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Heidemann, SR 2002 The molecular and cellular bases of physiologic regulation. In: Cunningham, JG (ed) Textbook of Veterinary Physiology pp 2–29. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Barnett, JL and Campbell, RG 1996 A study of the relative aversiveness of a new daily injection procedure for pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, J, de Pasillé, AM, Rushen, J, Schouten, W, Terlouw, EMC and von Borell, E 1993 Stress and the physiological correlates of stereotypic behaviour. In: Lawrence, AM, Rushen, J (eds) Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare pp 97–118. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, HG 1975 The red fox in Britain. In: Fox, MW (ed) The Wild Canids, Their Systematics, Behavioural Ecology and Evolution pp 207–215. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, DW 1983 The ecology of carnivore social behaviour. Nature 301: 379–384Google Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, GJ 1991 Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteri, RL, Carroll, JA and Dyer, CJ 2000 Neuroendocrine responses to stress. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare pp 43–76. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, GP 2000 Biological response to stress: implication for animal welfare. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress. Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare pp 1–21. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mononen, J, Kasanen, S, Harjunpää, S, Harri, M, Pyykönen, T and Ahola, L 2000 A family housing experiment in mink. Scientifur 24: 114–117Google Scholar
Ödberg, FO 1989 Behavioural coping in stress conditions. In: Blanchard, RJ, Brain, PF, Blanchard, CD and Parmigiani, S (eds) Ethoexperimental Approaches to the Study of Behaviour pp 229–238. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rekilä, T, Ahola, L, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1998 Effect of the environment inside and outside the cage on the activity and behaviour test performance of silver foxes. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 7: 13–19Google Scholar
Rekilä, T, Harri, M, Jalkanen, L and Mononen, J 1999 Relationship between hyponeophagia and adrenal cortex function in farmed foxes. Physiology & Behaviour 65: 779–783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rekilä, T, Mononen, J and Harri, M 1996 Effect of inside-cage and outside-cage environment on behaviour test performance of blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 46: 247–252Google Scholar
Sandell, M 1989 The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. In: Gittleman, JL (ed) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution pp 164–182. Cornell University Press: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S and Castellan, NJ 1988 Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
SPSS 1999 SPSS® Base 9.0 Applications Guide. SPSS Inc: Chicago IL, USAGoogle Scholar
von Schantz, T 1984 Non-breeders in the red fox Vulpes vulpes: a case of resource surplus. Oikos 42: 59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikman, I, Mononen, J, Rekilä, T and Harri, M 1999 Stereotyped behaviour in juvenile foxes. In: Bøe KE, Bakken M and Braastad BO (eds) Proceedings of the 33rd International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology p 109. 17–21 August 1999. Lillehammer, NorwayGoogle Scholar