Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:20:50.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic opportunities for pork production without castration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

JWM Merks ,
EHAT Hanenberg ,
S Bloemhof  and
EF Knol
JWM Merks*
Affiliation:
IPG, Institute for Pig Genetics BV, PO Box 43, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
EHAT Hanenberg
Affiliation:
IPG, Institute for Pig Genetics BV, PO Box 43, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
S Bloemhof
Affiliation:
IPG, Institute for Pig Genetics BV, PO Box 43, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
EF Knol
Affiliation:
IPG, Institute for Pig Genetics BV, PO Box 43, 6640 AA Beuningen, The Netherlands
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In most parts of the world, male pigs are castrated shortly after birth to prevent the production of meat with an unpleasant odour called ‘boar taint’. However, public concerns regarding surgical castration are on the increase and it is becoming an important animal welfare issue due to the pain associated with the process. In addition, pork production from entire males is more desirable as it is 5-12% more efficient than that from castrates. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate genetic opportunities to stop castration and produce boar-taint-free pork from entire males as a long-term cost-effective solution to the problem. The main compounds responsible for boar taint are androstenone and skatole. The genetic aspects of these two main boar-taint components were investigated in purebred pigs of a commercial sire line as well as crossbreds of three sire lines. The comparison of crossbreds suggests that significant genetic differences can be expected in the market hogs due to different sire line choices. Heritabilities for the three components ranged from 0.25 to 0.64. Their genetic correlations with production traits were close to zero or favourable. Model calculations using these parameters suggest that it is possible to reduce the concentrations of the main boar-taint components below thresholds for boar taint. This way, pork can be produced from males without castration and problems of boar taint can be eliminated in approximately four generations of genetic selection.

Keywords

animal welfareboar taintcastrationheritabilitygenetic progresspigs
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , November 2009 , pp. 539 - 544
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aldal, I, Andresen, Ø, Egeli, AK, Haugen, J-E, Grødum, A, Fjetland, O and Eikaas, JLH 2005 Levels of androstenone and skatole and the occurrence of boar taint in fat from young boars. Livestock Production Science 95: 121–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babol, J, Squires, EJ and Lundström, K 1999 Relationship between metabolism of androstenone and skatole in intact male pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77: 84–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babol, J, Zamaratskaia, G, Juneja, RK and Lundstrøm, K 2004 The effect of age on the distribution of skatole and indole levels in entire male pigs in four breeds: Yorkshire, Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc. Meat Science 67: 351–358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloemhof, S, Bergsma, R, Harlizius, B, Mathur, PK, Merks, JWM and Knol, E Environmental and genetic influences on components of boar taint and finishing traits in pigs, submittedGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, M 1982 Compounds responsible for boar taint, with special emphasis on androstenone: a review. Livestock Production Science 9: 687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, M, Kempster, AJ, Claus, R, Claudi-Magnussen, C, Diestre, A, Tornberg, E, Walstra, P, Chevillon, P, Weiler, U and Cook, GL 2000 An international study on the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: I. Presentation of the programme and measurement of boar taint compounds with different analytical procedures. Meat Science 54: 251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, R, Herbert, E and Dehnhard, M 1997 Comparative determination of the boar taint steroid androstenone in pig adipose tissue by a rapid enzyme immunoassay and an HPLC method. Archiv Fuer Lebensmittelhygiene 48: 27–30Google Scholar
Claus, R, Weiler, U and Herzog, A 1994 Physiological aspects of androstenone and skatole formation in the boar, a review with experimental data. Meat Science 38: 289–305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, E, Whittington, FW, Wood, JD and McGivan, JD 2004 Characterisation of androstenone metabolism in pig liver microsomes. Chemico-Biological Interactions 147(2): 141–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, HJ, Broom, DM, Capua, I, Cinotti, S, Gunn, M, Hartung, J, Have, P, Manteca Vilanova, FJ, Morton Bmsu, DB, Pepin Afssa, M, Pfeiffer, DU, Robers, RJ, Sánchez-Vizcaino, JM, Schudel, A, Sharp, JM, Theodoropoulos, G, Vannier Afssa, P, Verga, M and Wierup, M 2004 Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from the Commission related to welfare aspects of the main systems of stunning and killing the main commercial species of animals. The EFSA Journal 45:1–29Google Scholar
Engelsma, K, Bergsma, R and Knol, EF 2007 Genetic parameters for components of boar taint and female fertility. 58th Annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. 26-29 August 2007, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
Harlizius, B, Bloemhof, S, Feitsma, H, Andresen, O, Hees, J, Verkuylen, B, Hortos, M, Merks, JWM and Knol, E 2008 Breeding against boar taint, an integrated approach. Pig Cas, EAAP working group ‘Production and Utilisation of Meat from Entire Male Pigs’. 26-27 2008 March, IRTA-Food Technology, 17121 Monells, Girona, SpainGoogle Scholar
Jensen, BB and Jensen, MT 1998 Microbial production of skatole in the digestive tract of entire male pigs. In: Klinth Jensen, W (ed) Skatole and Boar Taint pp 41–76. Danish Meat Research Institute: Maglegaardsvej 2, DK-4000 Roskilde, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Keller, A, Zhuang, H, Chi, Q, Voshall, L and Matsunami, H 2007 Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449: 468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, BW and Trimble, D 1988 A study on the incidence of blemishes on bacon carcasses in relation to carcass classification, sex and lairage conditions. Records of Agricultural Research 36: 101–107Google Scholar
Rutten, MJM and Bijma, P 2002 SelAction: Software to predict selection response and rate of inbreeding in Livestock Breeding programs. Journal of Heredity 93: 456–458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellier, P, Le Roy, P, Fouilloux, MN, Gruand, J and Bonneau, M 2000 Response to restricted index selection and genetic parameters for fat androstenone level and maturity status of young boars. Livestock Production Science 63: 265–274Google Scholar
Tajet, H, Andrese, Ø and Meuwissen, THE 2005 Estimation of genetic parameters of boar taint: skatole and androstenone and their correlations with sexual maturation. Prevention of Boar Taint in Pig Production: 19th Symposium of the Nordic Committee for Veterinary Scientific Cooperation. 21-22 November 2005, Gardermoen, NorwayGoogle Scholar
Tuomola, M, Harpio, R and Knuuttila, P 1997 Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for the measurement of androstenone in porcine serum and fat samples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45(9): 3529–3534Google Scholar
Walstra, P, Claudi-Magnussen, C, Chevillon, P, von-Seth, G, Diestre, A, Matthews, KR, Homer, DB and Bonneau, M 1999 An international study of the importance of androstenone and skatole for boar taint: levels of androstenone and skatole by country and season. Livestock Production Science 62: 15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamaratskia, G 2004 Factors involved in the development of boar taint - influence of breed, age, diet and raising conditions. Doctoral thesis, Department of Food Science, PO Box 7051, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), SE-750 07 Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Zamaratskaia, G and Squires, J 2008 Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal, Published online by Cambridge University Press 17 Dec 2008 doi:10.1017/S1751731108003674:1-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar