Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:25:16.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enrichment of laboratory caging for rats: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

EG Patterson-Kane
EG Patterson-Kane*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PH;, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rats are a well-understood and widely used laboratory species that should be provided with environmentally enriched caging in line with modern animal welfare guidelines. This paper reviews which sources of enrichment are effective and should be prioritised, and how methods for providing enrichment might be selected using rats’ preferences as a guide. Rats demonstrate high demand for social contact and prefer larger cages, and cages with shelters, nesting material and foraging devices. Rats also discriminate between different methods of providing a given type of enrichment. It is clear that rats should be provided with enrichments such as social contact and shelter, and, in fact, that these should probably be considered basic husbandry requirements rather than optional improvements. It is still difficult, however, for animal caretakers to access proven, standardised methods for providing appropriately enriched caging, and the level of enrichment routinely provided to most rats in the laboratory appears to be low. Further research is required to assess the impact of enrichment upon research variables and to develop commercially viable enrichment products for rats in the laboratory.

Keywords

animal welfareenvironmental enrichmentlaboratoryratsRattus norvegicusreview
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 13 , Issue S1: Science in the Service of Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium, Edinburgh, 2-4 April 2003 , February 2004 , pp. S209 - S214
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anzaldo, A J, Harrison, P C, Riskowski, G L, Maghirangi, R-G and Gonyou, H W 1994 Increasing welfare of laboratory rats with the help of spatially enhanced cages. Animal Welfare Information Centre Newsletter 5(3): 1–SGoogle Scholar
Bantin, G C and Sanders, P D 1989 Animal caging: is bigger necessarily better? Animal Technology 40(1): 45–54Google Scholar
Baumans, V, Augustsson, H, van de Weerd, H A and Kruitwagen, C L J J 2003 Environmental enrichment does not affect the variability of animal experimentation data in the light/dark test. 3R Info-Bulletin 22. Available at: http://www.forschung3r.ch/de/publications/bu22.htmlGoogle Scholar
Benefiel, A C and Greenough, W T 1998 Effects of experience and environment on the developing and mature brain: implications for laboratory animal housing. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 39(1): 5–11Google ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, A L and Poling, A 1991 Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: plastic pipes, Wood platforms, Wood chips and paper towels as enrichment items. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior SS: 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R T 1968 Early experience and problem-solving ability. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 3: 433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Cage design reduces emotionality in mice. Laboratory Animals 23: 215–219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chance, M R A and Russell, W M S 1997 The benefits of giving experimental animals the best possible environment. In: Reinhardt, V (ed) Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals pp 12–14. The Animal Welfare Institute: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Costali, A 1998 Lloyd Morgan, and the rise and fall of “animal psychology.” Society and Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies 6(1): 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M 1973 Early stimulation of rodents: a critical review of present interpretations. British Journal of Psychology 64: 435–460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, M 1977 Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preferences and welfare. Animal Behaviour 25: 1034–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, M S 1975 The rat's long-term preference for complexity in its environment. Animal Learning and Behaviour 3(3): 245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galef, B G 1999 Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents: animal welfare and the method of science. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2(4): 267–280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatch, A, Wiberg, G S, Balazs, T and Grice, H C 1963 Longterm isolation stress in rats. Science 142: 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, P, Berdoy, M, Deacon, R, Morrison, P, Sandells, B, Peters, A, Lewis, R, Harding, K, Jones, D, Jennings, M and Hubrecht, R 2001 Report of the 2000 RSPCA/UFAW rodent welfare group meeting. Animal Technology 52: 29–42Google Scholar
Home Office 1989 Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/hcasp1.html.Google Scholar
Home Office 1995 Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/hcadb2.html.Google Scholar
Hughes, R N 1969 Social facilitation of locomotion and exploration in rats. British Journal of Psychology 60(3): 385–388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunziker, M H L, Saldana, R L and Neuringer, A 1996 Behavioral variability in SHR and WKY rats as a function of rearing environment and reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 65: 129–144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, J L, Barnard, C J, Nevison, C M and West, C D 1997 Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: welfare implications of isolation and social contact among caged males. Animal Welfare 6: 329–347Google Scholar
Johnson, R N, DeSisto, M J and Koenig, A B 1972 Social and developmental experience and interspecific aggression in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 79(2): 237–242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S J 2002 An investigation into foraging enrichment for laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Masters Thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK, and the University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Kus, J 2001 Can environmental enrichment increase behavioural diversity in the laboratory rat, Rattus norvegicus? Origin: a Journal of Undergraduate Research in the Biological Sciences. Abstract available at: http://www.chester.ac.uk/origin/9.pdf.Google Scholar
Lawlor, M 1990 The size of rodent cages. In: Guttman, H N (ed) Guidelines for the Well-Being of Rodents in Research pp 19–28. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare (SCAW): Bethesda, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
Manser, C E, Broom, D M, Overend, P and Morris, T H 1998a Investigations into the preferences of laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 32: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manser, C E, Broom, D M, Overend, P and Morris, T H 1998b Operant studies to determine the strength of preference in laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 32: 36–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mering, S 2000 Housing environment and enrichment for laboratory rats — refinement and reduction outcomes. PhD Thesis, University of Kuopio, Finland. Available at: http://www.uku.fi/vaitok-set/2000/smering.pdf.Google Scholar
Morgan, M and Einon, P 1975 Incentive motivation and behavioural inhibition in socially isolated rats. Physiology and Behavior 15: 405–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortell, N 2001 Practical environmental enrichment for rats and mice (the results of a survey). Animal Technology 52: 1–15Google Scholar
Nelson, K, Patterson-Kane, E G and Love, J 2003 Using animal preferences to develop enriched caging for rats. Animal Technology and Welfare 2(2): 85–88Google Scholar
Olsson, I A S, Nevison, C M, Patterson-Kane, E G, Sherwin, C M, Van de Weerd, H A and Würbel, H 2003 Understanding behaviour: the relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 243–264Google Scholar
Patterson-Kane, E G 1999 Assessing and enriching the cage environment of laboratory rats. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Patterson-Kane, E G 2002 Cage size preferences of laboratory rats. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5(1): 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson-Kane, E G 2003 Shelter enrichment for rats. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 42(2): 40–42Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Kane, E G, Harper, D N and Hunt, M 2001 The cage preferences of laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 35: 74–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Kane, E G, Hunt, M and Harper, D 1999 Behavioural indexes of poor welfare in laboratory rats. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2(2): 97–110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Kane, E G, Hunt, M and Harper, D 2002 Rats demand social contact. Animal Welfare 11: 327–332Google Scholar
Perez, C, Canal, J R, Domingues, E, Campillo, J E, Guillen, M and Torres, M D 1997 Individual housing influences certain biochemical parameters in the rat. Laboratory Animals 31: 357–361CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, M T 1993 Savages, drunks, and lab animals: the researchers perception of pain. Society and Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies 1(1): 119–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pifer, L, Shimizu, K and Pifer, R 1994 Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons. Society and Animals: Journal of Human-Animal Studies 2(2): 95–113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raje, S S and Stewart, K L 2000 Group housing female guinea pigs. Lab Animal 29(5): 31–32Google ScholarPubMed
Rampon, C, Tang, Y P, Goodhouse, J, Shimisu, E, Maureen, K and Tsien, J Z 2000 Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CAI NMDARI-knockout mice. Nature Neuroscience 3: 238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ras, M T and van de Ven, H W M 2002a Rat preference for comfort materials. Unpublished Internship Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Holland, and the University of British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Ras, T, van de Ven, M and Patterson-Kane, E G 2002b Rats’ preferences for corn versus wood-based bedding and nesting materials. Laboratory Animals 36: 420–425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauscher, F H, Robinson, K D and Jens, J J 1998 Improved maze learning through early music exposure in rats. Neurological Research 20: 427–431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, M J and Rosenzweig, M R 1987 Enriched and Impoverished Environments: Effects on Brain and Behaviour. Springer-Verlag: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M A 1990 Animal accommodation: is bigger better? Australian Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ACCART) News 3(1): 8Google Scholar
Rose, M A 1993 Social behaviour of rats and mice — individuals and groups. Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART) News 6(1): 10–11Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, M R and Bennett, E L 1996 Psychobiology of plasticity: effects of training and experience on brain and behavior. Behavioural Brain Research 78(1): 57–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowson, K E K and Michaels, L 1980 Injury to young mice by cottonwool used as nesting material. Laboratory Animals 14: 187CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stricklin, W P 1995 Space as an environmental enrichment. Laboratory Animals 24(4): 24–27Google Scholar
Syme, L A and Hughes, R N 1972 Social isolation in young rats: effects of cage size on open-field behaviour. Psychonomic Science 29(1): 25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P 1997 Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Animal Welfare 6: 95–103Google Scholar
van der Staay, F J and Steckler, T 2002 The fallacy of behavioural phenotyping without standardisation. Genes, Brain and Behavior 1: 9–13Google ScholarPubMed
Weiss, V J, Ernst, A and Schick, K L 1982 Wahlverhalten als Beurteilungskriterium fur die Haltungsbedingungen von Laborratten. Zietschrift fur Versuchstierkunde 24: 193–201 [Title translation: Choice behaviour as a criterion for husbandry of laboratory rats.]Google Scholar
Würbel, H 2002 Behavioral phenotyping enhanced — beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes, Brain and Behavior 1: 3–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed