Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T10:40:30.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFSA Scientific Opinion on the welfare of cattle at slaughter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

S Richmond*
Affiliation:
HSA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reports and Comments
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ede, T, Lecorps, B, Von Keyserlingk, MAG and Weary, DM 2019 Symposium review: Scientific assessment of affective states in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 102: 11. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2013 Monitoring Procedures at Slaughterhouses for Bovines. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/3460Google Scholar
Green, A, Clark, C, Favaro, L, Lomax, S and Reby, D 2019 Vocal individuality of Holstein-Friesian cattle is maintained across putatively positive and negative farming contexts. Nature Scientific Reports 9: 18468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54968-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, NG 2009 Pseudoaneurysm formation in severed arteries. In: Laurent, E and Morel, E (eds) Aneurysms: Types, Risks, Formation and Treatment pp 233241. Nova Biomedical Books: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Gregory, NG, Spence, JY, Mason, CW, Tinarwo, A and Heasman, L 2009 Effectiveness of poll stunning water buffalo with captive bolt guns. Meat Science 81: 1. https://10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.07.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welfare Quality ® 2009 Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Cattle. https://edepot.wur.nl/233467Google Scholar