Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:45:47.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Lighting on Heart Rate and Positional Preferences During Confinement in Farmed Red Deer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J C Pollard  and
R P Littlejohn
J C Pollard*
Affiliation:
Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
R P Littlejohn
Affiliation:
Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two experiments were carried out to determine whether lighting conditions during handling affected heart rate or behaviour in farmed red deer. In Experiment 1 heart rate was measured in 24 individual deer, held under restraint in a mechanical deer crush for two minutes, under either dark (0lux) or light (1500lux) conditions. A stethoscope was used to monitor heartbeat which was indicated vocally by the stethoscope operator on to a Dictaphone. In Experiment 2, 10 groups of three deer were confined for four minutes in an unfamiliar 4×6m light-proof pen with lighting provided either on the left or right-hand side of the pen, to provide a gradient across the pen from approximately 12 to 1000lux. For the first two minutes the deer were alone and for the second two minutes a person stood in the pen. An infrared video camera was used to record behaviour.

In Experiment 1, heart rate was lower (P < 0.05) in the dark compared with in the light when recording commenced, thereafter it decreased overall with similar (P > 0.05) values observed for the different lighting treatments. In Experiment 2, the mean position of the groups across the pen varied according to whether lighting was on the left or right, with groups displaced to the right when the lights were on the left, and standing in the middle of the pen when the lights were on the right (P < 0.05). During testing, groups moved away from whichever side the lights were on (P < 0.05). The experiments suggested that stress during restraint was reduced by providing darkness and that deer preferred dim lighting compared with bright lighting when confined in unfamiliar surroundings.

Keywords

animal welfarehandlingheart ratelightingpreferencesred deer
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 329 - 337
Copyright
© 1995 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Archer, J 1979 Behavioural aspects of fear. In: W Sluckin (ed) Fear in Animals and Man pp 56–85. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Campos, J J 1976 Heart rate: a sensitive tool for the study of emotional development in the infant. In: L P Lipsitt (ed) Developmental Psychobiology: The Significance of Infancy pp 1–31. Lawrence Earlbaum: New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Duffy, G 1988 Smart yard suit deer and pocket. The Deer Farmer 47: 31–35Google Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Bailliere Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Hale, R L, Friend, T H and Macaulay, A S 1987 Effect of method of restraint of cattle on heart rate, and Cortisol and thyroid hormones. Journal of Animal Science 65 Supplement 1 (Abstract). 217Google Scholar
Haroutunian, V and Campbell, B A 1981 Development and habituation of the heart rate orienting response to auditory and visual stimuli in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 95: 166–174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, D 1986 Farm layout and yard design. In: P Owen (ed) Deer Farming into the Nineties pp 37–40. Owen Art and Publishing: Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
MacDougall, D B, Shaw, B G, Nute, G R and Rhodes, DN 1979 Effect of pre-slaughter handling on the quality and microbiology of venison from farmed young red deer. Journal of Food, Science and Agriculture 30: 1160–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullagh, P and Neider, J A 1989 Generalised Linear Models (Second Edition). Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H D and Thompson, R 1971 Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C and Littlejohn, R P 1994 Behavioural effects of light conditions on red deer in a holding pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C, Littlejohn, R P and Suttie, J M 1993 Effects of isolation and mixing of social groups on heart rate and behaviour of red deer stags. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, S, Sibly, R M and Davies, M H 1993 Effects of behaviour and handling on heart rate in farmed red deer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37: 111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, R 1988 The Natural History of Deer. Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, USAGoogle Scholar
Selwyn, P and Hathawy, S 1990 A study of the prevalence and economic significance of diseases and defects of slaughtered farm deer. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 38: 94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, T and Hunn, R 1982 Helicopter live capture. In: D Yerex (ed) The Farming of Deer: World Trends and Modern Techniques pp 84–92. Agricultural Promotion Associates Ltd: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar