Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T21:19:03.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Density and Cage Size on Stress in Domestic Cats (Felis Sil Vestris Catus) Housed in Animal Shelters and Boarding Catteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M R Kessler  and
D C Turner
M R Kessler*
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Institute for Animal Science, Physiology & Animal Husbandry, ETH Zentrum, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
D C Turner
Affiliation:
Institute for applied Ethology and Animal Psychology, IEAP, CH-8816 Hirzel, Switzerland; and Zoology Institute, University of Zurich-Irchel, Switzerland
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints at: Chamerstrasse 15, CH-6331 Hünenberg, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study investigated the influence of density and floor area on stress and the adaptation process of cats in animal shelters and boarding catteries. Sixty-three rescued cats were observed on 113 days in a shelter at group densities of 0.3-0.9 animals m−2. In addition, 49 rescued cats were observed during their first week after being admitted to a control group housed at a density of 0.5 or 0.8 animals m−2, and 44 boarding cats were observed in single cages of either 0.7 or 1.0 m2 floor area during their first week in a cattery.

Group density was highly correlated with the stress level of animals housed in groups. A stress level of ‘weakly tense ‘ was reached when the group density reached 0.6 animals m−2. During the first week of their stay, stress levels among cats which had been newly admitted to groups housed at 0.5 or 0.8 animals m−2 did not differ significantly. On days 1, 2 and 6 after admission, boarding cats housed in single cages with a floor area of 1.0m2 had significantly lower stress levels than animals in cages with a floor area of 0.7m2.

Group density was clearly shown to influence the adaptation process of cats which were housed for several weeks in groups. In order to avoid high stress levels, a group density of 0.6 animals m−2 should not be exceeded. However, the minimum spatial requirement for singly housed cats remains unknown.

Keywords

animal husbandryanimal shelteranimal welfarecathousing space requirementsstress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , August 1999 , pp. 259 - 267
Copyright
© 1999 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bradshaw, J W 1992 The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat. CAB International: Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M 1988 The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsh, E B and Turner, D C 1988 The human-cat relationship. In: Turner D C and Bateson P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 159-177. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Kerby, G and Macdonald, D W 1988 Cat society and the consequences of colony size. In: Turner, D C and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 67–81. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M, Turner, D C 1997 Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly, in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 6: 243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M and Turner, D C 1999 Socialization and stress in cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly and in groups in animal shelters. Animal Welfare 8: 15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyhausen, P 1979 Katzen, eine Verhaltenskunde (5th edition). Paul Parey: Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Liberg, O and Sandell, M 1988 Spatial organisation and reproductive tactics in the domestic cat and other felids. In: Turner, D C and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 83–98. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Loveridge, G 1994 Provision of environmentally enriched housing for cats. Animal Technology 45: 69–87Google Scholar
Marchand, C and Moore, A 1991 Die Bestände und Haltung von Haustieren in aller Welt. Waltham Focus 1: 14–15Google Scholar
McCune, S 1992 Temperament and Welfare of Caged Cats. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1994 Caged cats: avoiding problems and providing solutions. Newsletter of the Companion Animal Study Croup 7: 1–9Google Scholar
Mertens, C and Schär, R 1988 Practical aspects of research of cats. In: Turner D C and Bateson P (eds) The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour pp 179-190. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, A L and Broom, D M 1995 The behaviour and welfare of cats in quarantine. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Human-animal Interactions pp 89. Association Française d’Information et de Recherche sur l’Animal de Compagne (AFIRAC): Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Roy, D 1992 Environment Enrichment for Cats in Rescue Centres. Unpublished BSc thesis, University of Southampton, UKGoogle Scholar
Smith, D F, Durman, K J, Roy, D B and Bradshaw, J W 1990 Behavioural aspects of the welfare of rescued cats. The Journal of the Feline Advisory Bureau 31: 25–28Google Scholar
Turner, D C 1995 Die Mensch-Katze-Beziehung. Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena, GermanyGoogle Scholar
UK Cat Behaviour Working Group 1995 An ethogram for behavioural studies of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus L.) UFAW Animal Welfare Research Report 8: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar