Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:22:38.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Browse, Human Visitors and Noise on the Behaviour of Captive Orang Utans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

L Birke
L Birke*
Affiliation:
Animal Division, Chester Zoo, Chester, CH2 1LH, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper reports a study of the behaviour of captive orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus) at Chester Zoo, UK. The study addressed two questions: what is the effect of the presence of fresh browse on the animals’ behaviour; and what is the effect of the presence of visitors? The first part of the study analysed the animals’ time budgets. The results indicated that the provision of fresh browse led to a decrease in the time spent sitting inactive by both adults and infants; it also led to an increase in the time spent by adults foraging for small food items in the woodchip floor-covering beneath the branches of browse. The time-budget data also showed differences in the animals’ behaviour between periods when large groups of visitors arrived and other periods on the same days when visitors were fewer. Specifically, adults used available paper sacks to cover their heads more during periods of high visitor density, and infants held onto adults more. The second part of the study comprised an experiment in which visitor behaviour was manipulated. Visitor groups of similar sizes were asked to behave either quietly or noisily (making vocal noise), in order to determine whether the observed effects of visitors were attributable to group size or to the fact that larger groups tend to be noisier. The experiment indicated that the animals responded particularly to noise: when confronted with noisy groups, all animals looked more at the visitors, and infants approached and held onto adults more. The findings suggest that zoo managers may need to take visitor behaviour into account in order to promote orang utan welfare.

Keywords

environmental enrichmentorang utanresponses to zoo visitorszoo animal welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 2002 , pp. 189 - 202
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Baer, J F 1998 A veterinary perspective of potential risk factors in environmental enrichment. In: Shepherdson D J, Mellen J D and Hutchins M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 277-301. Smithsonian Inst: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Bakken, M, Moe, R O, Smith, A J and Selle, G-M E 1999 Effects of environmental stressors on deep body temperature and activity levels in silver fox vixens (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S, Hosey, G R and Schaetzel, P 1988 Visitors excite primates in zoos. Zoo Biology 7: 359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Environmental enrichment: a review. Animal Technology 40: 155–178Google Scholar
Cook, S and Hosey, G R 1995 Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the zoo. Zoo Biology 14: 431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1988 Behavioural deprivation: a central problem in animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, M S 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, I H and Poole, T B 1990 Promoting the welfare of farm and captive animals. In: Monaghan, P and Wood-Gush, D (eds) Managing the Behaviour of Animals pp 193–232. Chapman & Hall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, P H and Gonyou, H W 1997 Environmental challenge. In: Appleby M C and Hughes B 0 (eds) Animal Welfare pp 205–218. CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Hosey, G 2000 Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect? Animal Welfare 9: 343–358Google Scholar
Kaplan, G and Rogers, L J 1999 The Orang Utans. Allen & Unwin: St. Leonards, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Lambeth, S P, Bloomsmith, M A and Alford, P L 1997 Effects of human activity on chimpanzee wounding. Zoo Biology 16: 327–3333.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindburg, D G 1998 Enrichment of captive mammals through provisioning. In: Shepherdson, D J, Mellen, J D and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 262–276. Smithsonian Inst: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, J 1974 The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus). Animal Behaviour 22: 3–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, L 1999 Response of captive orang utans to human audiences. MPhil thesis, University of Manchester (Bolton Institute), UKGoogle Scholar
Mench, J A 1998 Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behavior. In: Shepherdson, D J, Mellen, J D and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 30–46. Smithsonian Inst: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G, Herring, F, Obradovich, S, Tromborg, C, Dowd, B, Neville, L E and Field, L 1991 Effects of visitors and cage changes on the behaviors of Mangabeys. Zoo Biology 10: 417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, A, Tañida, H, Tanaka, T and Yoshimoto, T 1996 The influence of human posture and movement on the approach and escape behaviour of weanling pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R C 1995 Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nimon, N J and Dalziel, F R 1991 Cross-species interaction and communication: a study method applied to captive siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and long-billed corella (Cacatua tenuirostris) contacts with humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norcup, S 2000 Camouflaged gorillas: barriers as enrichments for apes. The Shape of Enrichment 9: 5Google Scholar
Oswald, M and Kuyk, K 1977 The behavior of three lorisoid primate species before and after the public opening of the nocturnal house. In: Crockett C and Hutchins M (eds) Applied Behavioral Science pp 81100. Pika Press: Seattle, USAGoogle Scholar
Perkins, L A 1992 Variables that influence the activity of captive orangutans. Zoo Biology 11: 177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, M H 1998 Enriching the lives of zoo animals, and their welfare: where research can be fundamental. Animal Welfare 7: 151–175Google Scholar
Rushen, J, Taylor, A A and de Passillé, A M 1999 Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambrook, T D and Buchanan-Smith, H M 1997 Control and complexity in novel object enrichment. Animal Welfare 6: 207–216Google Scholar
Stevenson, M F 1983 The captive environment: its effect on exploratory and related behavioural responses in wild animals. In: Archer, J and Birke, L (eds) Exploration in Animals and Humans pp 176–197. Van Nostrand Rheinhold: Wokingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Stoskopf, M K 1983 The physiological effccts of psychological stressors. Zoo Biology 2: 179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, J K 1985 Increasing activity in captive orangutans: provision of manipulable and edible materials. Zoo Biology 4: 225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utami, S S, Wich, S A, Sterck, E H M and van Hooff, J A R A M 1997 Food competition between wild orangutans in large fig trees. International Journal of Primatology 18: 909–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veasey, J S, Waran, N K and Young, R J 1996 On comparing the behaviour of zoo housed animals with wild conspecifics as a welfare indicator. Animal Welfare 5: 13–24Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 1993 Animal boredom: towards an empirical approach of animal subjectivity. PhD Thesis: University of Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F and Birke, L 1997 Environmental challenge. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, B O (eds) Animal Welfare pp 35–48. CAB International: Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P R and Koolhaas, J M 1993 Stress and animal welfare. Animal Welfare 2: 195–218Google Scholar
Wilson, S F 1982 Environmental influences on the activity of captive great apes. Zoo Biology 1: 201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W 1998 Interactions among environmental enrichment, viewing crowds and zoo chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Zoo Biology 17: 211–2303.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarwood, C 2000 Exhibiting orangutans to simulate natural social structure and encourage natural social behaviour at Chester Zoo. Ratel 27: 46–51Google Scholar