Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:39:54.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of substrate availability on behavioural and physiological indicators of welfare in the African cichlid (Oreochromis mossambicus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

L Galhardo ,
J Correia  and
RF Oliveira
L Galhardo*
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, 34 Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal
J Correia
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, 34 Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal
RF Oliveira
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, 34 Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Male African cichlids (Oreochromis mossambicus) establish territories on the substrate upon which spawning pits are dug, thus attracting females. The substrate, therefore, plays a very significant role in its lifecycle. The effects of substrate access on behaviour and physiology in captivity were assessed. Mixed-sex, all-male and all-female groups were observed for five days, with and without substrate. Social patterns, behaviour directed towards the substrate, locomotor activity and spatial behaviour were recorded, and haematocrit, plasma cortisol and glucose levels were measured. Substrate inclusion saw a significant increase in behavioural diversity, sexual behaviour of dominant males in mixed groups, pit digging and territoriality whereas a lack of substrate was characterised by increased chafing and inactivity. Vacuum-pit digging was also observed. Frequency of aggression did not differ significantly and female behaviour was not affected by the presence of substrate. For both sexes, no differences in cortisol and glucose levels were found between the two treatments, but haematocrit increased with substrate. The key role played by substrate in territorial males is consistent with the behavioural and physiological data reported. In the absence of substrate, decreased territorial behaviour is contrasted with similar levels of aggression, cortisol and glucose; all of which are suggestive of a stress-related context. Moreover, the exhibition of vacuum activities is a signal that behavioural needs are not being met and may be some form of coping mechanism. These findings, taken in conjunction with the variations in behavioural diversity and inactivity, suggest that the welfare of male cichlids may be adversely affected by the absence of substrate.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural needscortisolfish welfareglucosesubstrate
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 239 - 254
Copyright
© 2008 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Almada, VC and Oliveira, RF 1997 Sobre o uso de estatística de simulação em estudos de comportamento. Análise Psicológica 15: 97–109. [Title translation: On the use of simulation statistics on behavioural studies]Google Scholar
Baerends, GP and Baerends-van Roon, JM 1950 An introduction to the study of the ethology of cichlid fishes. Behaviour Supplement 1: 1–242Google Scholar
Barlow, GW 1974 Hexagonal territories. Animal Behaviour 22: 876–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, CJ and Hurst, JL 1996 Welfare by design: The natural selection of welfare criteria. Animal Welfare 5: 405–433Google Scholar
Barreto, RE and Volpato, GL 2006 Stress responses of the fish Nile tilapia subjected to electroshock and social stressors. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 39: 1605–1612CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borges, RA, Oliveira, RF, Almada, VC and Canário, VM 1998 Short-term social modulation of 11-ketotestosterone urinary levels in males of the cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus during male-female interaction. Acta Ethologica 1: 43–48Google Scholar
Bracke, MBM and Hopster, H 2006 Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics 19: 77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, VA and Huntingford, FA 2004 Fish and welfare: do fish have the capacity for pain perception and suffering? Animal Welfare 13: S87–S92Google Scholar
Broom, DM and Johnson, KG 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandroo, KP, Duncan, IJH and Moccia, RD 2004 Can fish suffer? Perspectives on sentience, pain, fear and stress. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86: 225–250Google Scholar
Christ, H 1984 Behavioral-effects of Trh, 3-Me-His2-Trh and naloxone in Hemichromis bimaculatus. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 21: 727–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, TS, Parikh, V, Schrumpf, M and Fernald, RD 2005 Behavioral coping strategies in a cichlid fish: the role of social status and acute stress response in direct and displaced aggression. Hormones and Behavior 47: 336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cnaani, A, Tinman, S, Avidar, Y, Ron, M and Hulata, G 2004 Comparative study of biochemical parameters in response to stress in Oreochromis aureus, O mossambicus and two strains of O niloticus. Aquaculture Research 35: 1434–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, SA, Fernandes, MO, Iseki, KK and Negrao, JA 2003 Effect of the establishment of dominance relationships on cortisol and other metabolic parameters in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 36: 1725–1731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, MS 1980 Animal Suffering. The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman and Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animals' point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal-welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, IJH and Fraser, D 1997 Understanding Animal Welfare. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 19–31. CABI Publishing: Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Earley, RL, Edwards, JT, Aseem, O, Felton, K, Blumer, LS, Karom, M and Grober, MS 2006 Social interactions tune aggression and stress responsiveness in a territorial cichlid fish (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus). Physiology & Behavior 88: 353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estabrook, CB and Estabrook, GF 1989 ACTUS: a solution to the problem of small samples in the analysis of 2-way contingency-tables. Historical Methods 22: 5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foo, JTW and Lam, TJ 1993 Serum cortisol response to handling stress and the effect of cortisol implantation on testosterone level in the Tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. Aquaculture 115: 145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, G and Iles, TD 1972 The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. Their Biology and Evolution. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Galhardo, L, Appleby, MC, Waran, NK and Dos Santos, ME 1996 Spontaneous activities of captive performing bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus). Animal Welfare 5: 373–389Google Scholar
Gilmour, KM, Dibattista, JD and Thomas, JB 2005 Physiological causes and consequences of social status in salmonid fish. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45: 263–273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heiligenberg, W 1965 A quantitative analysis of digging movements and their relationship to aggressive behaviour in cichlids. Animal Behaviour 13: 163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntingford, FA, Adams, C, Braithwaite, VA, Kadri, S, Pottinger, TG, Sandøe, P and Turnbull, JF 2006 Current issues in fish welfare. Journal of Fish Biology 68: 332–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreger, MD, Hutchins, M and Fascione, N 1998 Context, ethics, and environmental enrichment in zoos and aquariums. In: Shepherdson, DJ, Mellen, JD and Hutchins, M (eds) Second Nature, Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals pp 59–82. Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, USAGoogle Scholar
Lane, J 2006 Can non-invasive glucocorticoid measures be used as reliable indicators of stress in animals? Animal Welfare 15: 331–342Google Scholar
Lindman, HR 1974 Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs. WH Freeman and Co: San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
Manning, A and Dawkins, MS 1992 An Introduction to Animal Behaviour. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour: an Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, G and Mendl, M 1993 Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare? Animal Welfare 2: 301–319Google Scholar
Mench, JA and Mason, GJ 1997 Behaviour. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 127–142. CABI Publishing: Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
Mendl, M and Paul, ES 2004 Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science. Animal Welfare 13: S17–S25Google Scholar
Mendonça, FZ 2006 Efeito da Privação de Ninho sobre a Agressividade e o Sucesso de Acasalamento em Machos de Tilápia-do-Nilo. MSc Thesis, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exactas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil. [Title translation: Effect of nest deprivation on the aggressive behaviour and mating success in Nile tilapia males]Google Scholar
Mommsen, TP, Vijayan, MM and Moon, TW 1999 Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9: 211–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, JD and Iwama, GK 1997 Measurements of stressed states in the field. In: Iwama, GK, Pickering, AD, Sumpter, JP and Schreck, CB (eds) Fish Stress and Health in Aquaculture pp 247–268. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Munro, AD and Pitcher, TJ 1985 Steroid hormones and agonistic behavior in a cichlid teleost, Aequidens pulcher. Hormones and Behavior 19: 353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neil, EH 1966 Observations on behavior of Tilapia Mossambica(Pisces Cichlidae) in Hawaiian ponds. Copeia 1: 50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, CM 1995 Male size, spawning pit size and female mate choice in a lekking cichlid fish. Animal Behaviour 50: 1587–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, RF and Almada, VC 1996 Dominance hierarchies and social structure in captive groups of the Mozambique tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus(Teleostei: Cichlidae). Ethology Ecology and Evolution 8: 39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, RF and Almada, VC 1998a Dynamics of social interactions during group formation in males of the cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus. Acta Ethologica 1: 57–70Google Scholar
Oliveira, RF and Almada, VC 1998b Maternal aggression during the mouthbrooding cycle in the cichlid fish, Oreochromis mossambicus. Aggression Behaviour 24: 187–1963.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, RF and Almada, VC 1998c Mating tactics and male-male courtship in the lek-breeding cichlid, Oreochromis mossambicus. Journal of Fish Biology 52: 1115–1129Google Scholar
Pinheiro, M 1980 Observações etológicas em Sarotherodon mossambicus(Peters) (Pisces, Cichidae) Garcia de Orta, Série Zoologie 9: 13–50. [Title translation: Ethological observations of Sarotherodon mossambicus]Google Scholar
Reebs, SG 2002 Plasticity of diel and circadian activity rhythms in fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 12: 349–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J 2002 The neurobehavioral nature of fishes and the question of awareness and pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10: 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, LG 2001 Restraint, anaesthesia and euthanasia. In: Wildgoose, WH (eds) Veterinary Practice and Procedures for Ornamental Fish pp 75–83. British Small Animal Veterinary Association: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, CM and Hepburn, HR 1976 Sleep in a schooling fish, Tilapia-Mossambica. Physiology & Behavior 16: 613–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveira-Coffigny, R, Prieto-Trujillo, A and Ascencio-Valle, F 2004 Effects of different stressors in haematological variables in cultured Oreochromis aureus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C-Toxicology and Pharmacology 139: 245–250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, CJ and Haley, SR 1988 Steroid profiles of the female Tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus, and correlation with oocyte growth and mouthbrooding behavior. General and Comparative Endocrinology 69: 88–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneddon, LU 2003 Trigeminal somatosensory innervation of the head of a teleost fish with particular reference to nociception. Brain Research 972: 44–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneddon, LU, Braithwaite, VA and Gentle, MJ 2003 Do fishes have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270: 1115–1121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trewavas, E 1983 Tilapine Fishes of the Genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia. British Museum (Natural History): London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, GF 1994 The fighting tactics of male mouthbrooding cichlids: the effects of size and residency. Animal Behaviour 47: 655–662Google Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F, Haskell, M, Mendl, MT, Calvert, S and Lawrence, B 2000 Diversity of behaviour during novel object tests is reduced in pigs housed in substrate-impoverished conditions. Animal Behaviour 60: 385–394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zar, JH 1984 Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar