Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:29:55.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of providing a greater freedom of movement through periodic exercise on the welfare and stress physiology of stall-housed gestating sows and on piglet behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

M Tokareva ,
JA Brown ,
DJ MacPhee ,
DM Janz  and
YM Seddon
M Tokareva*
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada
JA Brown
Affiliation:
Prairie Swine Centre Inc, Box 21057, 2105 8th Street East, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7H 5N9, Canada
DJ MacPhee
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada
DM Janz
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada
YM Seddon
Affiliation:
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Canada, the 2014 Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Pigs proposed the continued operation of existing stall barns after 2024 on condition that bred sows be given access to periodic exercise. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of periodic exercise on sow welfare. Sows (n = 180) were assigned to one of three treatments: stall-housed (Control: C); stall-housed and exercised weekly for 10 min (Exercise: E); and group-housed (Group: G). Sow postures and stereotypies were recorded once per week in early, mid and late gestation before (AM) and after (PM) exercise. Female piglets (n = 168 from C, E and G sows) underwent isolation and novel object tests at 19-22 days of age. Postures differed by treatment in AM with G sows lying more and sitting less than C and E sows, which did not differ. In PM, E sows sat more than G sows, with C sows being intermediate. In early gestation, G sows performed fewer stereotypies than E sows, with C sows being intermediate. In mid gestation, G sows performed fewer stereotypies than C and E sows, which did not differ. Piglets from C sows were more active in the novel object test than E and G piglets, which did not differ. Group housing improved sow comfort (indicated by postures) and reduced sow stress (indicated by stereotypies), but periodic exercise did not. Decreased activity level in piglets from sows given greater freedom of movement indicates that gestation housing can influence the behaviour of offspring.

Keywords

animal welfaregestation stallhair cortisolperiodic movementpigprenatal stress
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 293 - 308
Copyright
© 2022 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bacci, ML, Nannoni, E, Govoni, N, Scorrano, F, Zannoni, A, Forni, M, Martelli, G and Sardi, L 2014 Hair cortisol determination in sows in two consecutive reproductive cycles. Reproductive Biology 14: 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repbio.2014.06.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brajon, S, Ringgenberg, N, Torrey, S, Bergeron, R and Devillers, N 2017 Impact of prenatal stress and environmental enrichment prior to weaning on activity and social behaviour of piglets (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 197: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM, Mendl, MT and Zanella, AJ 1995 A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Animal Science 61: 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800013928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, N, Manteca, X, Peña, LR, Bassols, A and Fàbrega, E 2017 Analysis of cortisol in hair samples as an indicator of stress in pigs. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 19: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapinal, N, Ruiz de la Torre, JL, Cerisuelo, A, Gasa, J, Baucells, MD, Coma, J, Vidal, A and Manteca, X 2010 Evaluation of welfare and productivity in pregnant sows kept in stalls or in 2 different group housing systems. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 5: 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2009.09.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorr, HG, Heller, A, Versmold, HT, Sippell, WG, Herrmann, M, Bidlingmaier, F and Knorr, D 1989 Longitudinal study of progestins, mineralocorticoids, and glucocorticoids throughout human pregnancy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 68: 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-68-5-863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, RE, Groat, J, Wynn, PC and Holyoake, PK 2015 Physiological and nonphysiological indicators of body condition score in weaner pigs. Journal of Animal Science 93: 1887–1895. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drolet, G, Dumont, EC, Gosselin, I, Kinkead, R, Laforest, S and Trottier, JF 2001 Role of endogenous opioid system in the regulation of the stress response. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 25: 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-5846(01)00161-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everding, TK, Seddon, YM, Perez-Palencia, JY and Levesque, CL 2020 Quantifying cortisol in hair as a chronic stress biomarker in group-housed and stall-housed sows during gestation. Journal of Animal Science 98(S2)Google Scholar
Fraser, D, Weary, DM, Pajor, EA and Milligan, BN 1997 A sci-entific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare 6: 187–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, EK, Berg, EP, Berg, EL and Vonnahme, KA 2013 Effect of maternal activity during gestation on maternal behavior, fetal growth, umbilical blood flow, and farrowing characteristics in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91: 734–744. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5769CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, JP, Johnston, LJ, Baidoo, SK and Shurson, GC 2006 Effects of high-fiber diet and frequent feeding on behavior, reproductive per-formance, and nutrient digestibility in gestating sows. Journal of Animal Science 84: 946–955. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844946xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlen, GAM, Hemsworth, PH, Gonyou, HW, Fabrega, E, David Strom, A and Smits, RJ 2007 The welfare of gestating sows in con-ventional stalls and large groups on deep litter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 105: 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, KH, Hosseindoust, A, Ingale, SL, Lee, SH, Noh, HS, Choi, YH, Jeon, SM, Kim, YH and Chae, BJ 2016 Effects of gestational housing on reproductive performance and behavior of sows with different backfat thickness. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 29: 142–148. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0973CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranendonk, G, Hopster, H, Fillerup, M, Ekkel, ED, Mulder, EJH and Taverne, MAM 2006 Cortisol administration to pregnant sows affects novelty-induced locomotion, aggressive behaviour, and blunts gender differences in their offspring. Hormones and Behavior 49: 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.12.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranendonk, G, Van Der Mheen, H, Fillerup, M and Hopster, H 2007 Social rank of pregnant sows affects their body weight gain and behavior and performance of the offspring. Journal of Animal Science 85: 420–429. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, AB and Terlouw, EMC 1993 A review of behavioural factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviours in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2815–2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lay, DC, Kattesh, HG, Cunnick, JE, Daniels, MJ, McMunn, KA, Toscano, MJ and Roberts, MP 2008 Prenatal stress effects on pig development and response to weaning. Journal of Animal Science 86: 1316–1324. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, YZ and Gonyou, HW 2007 Effects of stall width and sow size on behaviour of gestating sows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87: 129–138. https://doi.org/10.4141/A06-034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macbeth, BJ, Cattet, MRL, Stenhouse, GB, Gibeau, ML and Janz, DM 2010 Hair cortisol concentration as a noninvasive mea-sure of long-term stress in free-ranging grizzly bears (Ursus arctos): considerations with implications for other wildlife. The Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 935–949. https://doi.org/10.1139/Z10-057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant-Forde, RM and Marchant-Forde, JN 2004 Pregnancy-related changes in behavior and cardiac activity in prim-iparous pigs. Physiology & Behavior 82: 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.06.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, J 2013 Review: Updated scientific evidence on the wel-fare of gestating sows kept in different housing systems. The Professional Animal Scientist 29: 189–198. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30224-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Farm Animal Care Council 2014 Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Pigs. https://www.nfacc.ca/pdfs/codes/pig_code_of_practice.pdfGoogle Scholar
Odberg, F 1978 Abnormal behaviors: stereotypes. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Ethology Applied to Zootechnics pp 475–480. Industrias Graficas Espana, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
Odberg, FO 1987 The influence of cage size and environmental enrichment on the development of stereotypies in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Behavioural Processes 14: 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(87)90042-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, RT, Appleby, MC, Chinn, K, Douglas, L, Firkins, LD, Houpt, KA, Irwin, C, McGlone, JJ, Sundberg, P, Tokach, L and Wills, RW 2005 A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 227: 1580–1590. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.227.1580CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rioja-Lang, FC, Hayne, SM and Gonyou, HW 2013 The effect of pen design on free space utilization of sows group housed in ges-tation pens equipped with free access stalls. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 148: 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, S, Godding, L, de, Haan Jr, van der Staay, FJ and Nordquist, RE 2019 Effects of parity and litter size on cortisol mea-sures in commercially housed sows and their offspring. Physiology & Behavior 201: 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenck, EL, McMunn, KA, Rosenstein, DS, Stroshine, RL, Nielsen, BD, Richert, BT, Marchant-Forde, JN and Lay, DC 2008 Exercising stall-housed gestating gilts: Effects on lameness, the musculo-skeletal system, production, and behavior. Journal of Animal Science 86: 3166–3180. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorrells, AD, Eicher, SD, Scott, KA, Harris, MJ, Pajor, EA, Lay, DC and Richert, BT 2006 Postnatal behavioral and physiological responses of piglets from gilts housed individually or in groups during gestation. Journal of Animal Science 84: 757–766. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.843757xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spoolder, HAM and Vermeer, HM 2015 Gestation group housing of sows. In: Farmer, C (ed) The Gestating and Lactating Sow pp 47–71. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-803-2_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, DGM 1984 The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annals of Veterinary Research 15: 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100040411Google ScholarPubMed
Tatemoto, P, Bernardino, T, Alves, L, de Oliveira Souza, AC, Palme, R and Zanella, AJ 2019 Environmental enrichment for pregnant sows modulates HPA-axis and behavior in the offspring. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 220: 104854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokareva, M, Brown, JA, Woodward, A, Pajor, EA and Seddon, YM 2021 Movement or more food? A comparison of motivation for exercise and food in stall-housed sows and gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 240: 105348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonsor, GT, Olynk, N and Wolf, C 2009 Consumer preferences for animal welfare attributes: The case of gestation crates. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41: 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800003175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SA, Aherne, FX, Meaney, MJ, Schaefer, AL and Dixon, WT 2000 Neonatal handling permanently alters hypotha-lamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, behaviour, and body weight in boars. Journal of Endocrinology 164: 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1640349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weng, RC, Edwards, SA and Hsia, LC 2009 Effect of individual, group or ESF housing in pregnancy and individual or group housing in lactation on sow behavior. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 22: 1575–1580. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80254Google ScholarPubMed
Zanella, AJ, Broom, DM, Hunter, JC and Mendl, MT 1996 Brain opioid receptors in relation to stereotypies, inactivity, and housing in sows. Physiology & Behavior 59: 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(95)02118-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, M, Li, X, Zhang, X, Liu, H, Li, J and Bao, J 2017 Effects of confinement duration and parity on behavioural responses and the degree of psychological fear in pregnant sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 193: 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar